Cases

In re McGhee, Gary; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Iberia, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 67,550; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. KW96-1415. Denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

547 F.3d 922 (2008) Curtis W. McGHEE, Jr., Appellee, v. POTTAWATTAMIE COUNTY, IOWA; Joseph Hrvol; David Richter, Appellants. Terry Harrington, individually and in his capacity as the father of Nicole Antoinette Harrington, Appellee, v. County of Pottawattamie, Iowa; David Richter, in his individual and official capacities; Joseph Hrvol, in his individual and official capacities, Appellants. Curtis W. McGhee Jr., Appellee, v.

289 S.W.3d 18 (2008) Sharon McGHEE, Sydney McGhee, Roberto Salas, Charles Stewart, Henry Evans, Craig Savell, and Patrick Henry Hays, Individually and o/b/o a Class of Similarly Situated Persons, Appellants, v. ARKANSAS STATE BOARD OF COLLECTION AGENCIES and Rusty Guinn, Jerry Markham, Randy Bynum, Opal Lang, and Gary Frala, in their official Capacities as Board Members of the Arkansas State Board of Collection Agencies, Appellees, Arkansas F

908 F.Supp. 566 (1995) Andrew W. McGHEE, Plaintiff, v. Richard L. JOUTRAS, individually and as trustee for the Richard L. Joutras Trust; Richard L. Joutras Trust;[1] Gary R. Dorn, individually and as trustee for the Gary R. Dorn Trust; and the Gary R. Dorn Trust, Defendants. No. 94 C 7052. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. December 15, 19

HULL, Circuit Judge: In this uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) coverage case, three excess liability insurers — Great American Insurance Company (“Great American”), American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Company (“American Guarantee”), and Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company (“Endurance”) (collectively “the Defendants”) — appeal the district court’s order

In re Whitley, John P„ Wdn., L.S.P.;— Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Martin, 16th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 67,550. Denied.

Blajszczak v McGhee-Reynolds (2021 NY Slip Op 00728) Blajszczak v McGhee-Reynolds 2021 NY Slip Op 00728 Decided on February 5, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 866 Defendant, Frank McGhee, was indicted in the circuit court of Kane County on one count of armed robbery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 18-2(a)), one count of armed violence (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 33A-2) and one count of attempted murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, pars. 8-4(a), 9-1). Fol

Donald L. Corbin, Justice. This is the second appeal of a case alleging an illegal exaction under article 16, section 13, of the Arkansas Constitution and challenging the constitutionality of the Arkansas Check-Cashers Act, codified at Ark. Code Ann. §§ 23-52-101 to -117 (Repl. 2000 & Supp. 2003). In the present appeal, Appellants Sharon McGhee, and other members of the class alleging an illegal

OPINION OF THE COURT GILLEY, Judge: Contrary to her pleas, a general court-martial consisting of officers and enlisted members convicted the appellant of maiming and of unlawfully striking her son Anthony, unlawfully killing her daughter Shanta by involuntary manslaughter, and of unlawfully striking Shanta (two specifications). Those convictions were based on violations of Article 119, 124, and 128, Unifo

WEIGEL, District Judge. Two individuals, both officers and shareholders in a bankrupt corporation, appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The district court, by minute order, affirmed a United States Magistrate’s order that the trustee in bankruptcy of the bankrupt firm had t

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Philip Lomason appeals the district court’s denial of his post-judgment motion for Rule 11 sanctions in this defamation action. For the following reasons, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. Harry McGhee is a former deputy sheriff of Sanilac County, Michigan. In 1984,

RYAN, Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant, John McGhee, pled guilty to Counts I and VI of a nine-count indictment. The district court denied his motion to arrest judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 34, as to Count I. In his motion, McGhee argued that the indictment, charging him with a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 843(b) and 846 for knowingly and intentionally using a communication

JUSTICE HEIPLE delivered the opinion of the court: The instant appeal involves a search of Harold McGhee’s automobile after he was issued a citation for a traffic violation. The trial judge determined that the arresting officer had no probable cause to search the car and granted McGhee’s motion to suppress evidence found in the unlawful search. The State appeals.

Karen King Mitchell, Presiding Judge William McGhee filed suit under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA) against Schreiber Foods, Inc., alleging age discrimination in his termination from employment. A jury found in favor of McGhee, and the trial court entered a judgment totaling $1,170,030.45 in damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees. Schreiber appeals the trial court’s denial of

52 Md. App. 238 (1982) 447 A.2d 888 STATE OF MARYLAND v. THOMAS MONROE McGHEE. No. 1698, September Term, 1981. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided July 14, 1982. The cause was argued before GILBERT, C.J., and MORTON, J., and W. ALBERT MENCHINE, Associate Judge of the Court of Special Appeals (retired), specially assigned.

BRADFORD, Judge, dissenting. In reversing, the majority characterizes Detective Cole’s statement as, at the very least, an implied promise not to prosecute McGhee. I am not convinced that Detective Cole’s statement qualified as an implied promise, or for that matter, a direct promise, or that it clearly rendered McGhee’s confession involuntary such that the trial court’s finding of voluntariness must be reversed.

In re Gary L. McGhee, applying for supervisory writs to the Sixteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Martin, No. 67550, Section “B”. Denied. DENNIS, J., would grant the writ.

WILSON, Presiding Judge: This workers’ compensation case involves a statute of limitation problem. The specific issue is whether the limitation statute was tolled or waived when the claimant, within one year of his injury and at the suggestion of his employer’s insurance carrier, went to his own doctor who performed a medical examination but prescribed no medication or therapy or other measures. Claimant

08/08/2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON April 23, 2025 Session SHIRLEY JEAN CUPPLES BLANKENSHIP v. CHARLES GARY BLANKENSHIP SR. AND CHARLES GARY BLANKENSHIP II v. SHIRLEY JEAN CUPPLES BLANKENSHIP Appeal from the Chancery Court for Gibson County No. H6329, H