Cases

ORDER TO SEVER JOYNER, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court heard oral argument on numerous pending motions to sever, stay, strike or dismiss third-party complaints filed by Plaintiffs and third-party Defendants. After considering the arguments of the parties, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the case law cited by the parties, the Court grants the motions to sever the third-party com

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion February 17, 1987, 11th Cir., 1987. 809 F.2d 1537) Before RONEY, Chief Judge, GODBOLD, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges * .

*256 ON SUA SPONTE RECONSIDERATION BY THE COURT: Affirming a judgment for plaintiff against co-employees at Tennessee Valley Authority for negligence causing plaintiff’s on-the-job injury, a panel of the Court followed the prior law of this Circuit and held the doctrine of official

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 13, 2015 Session SUSAN LEE PHILLIPS, Executrix and Surviving Spouse of ROBERT WAYNE PHILLIPS, Deceased v. GARY Q. CASEY, M.D., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sullivan County No. C40306(C) E.G. Moody, Judge ______________________________

BARKETT, Circuit Judge, dissenting: For the reasons stated in my dissent in Hill v. Humphrey, 662 F.3d 1335, 1365-78 (11th Cir.2011) (en banc), I continue to believe that Georgia’s requirement that defendants prove mental retardation beyond a reasonable doubt is unconstitutional under Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S.Ct. 2242, 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002). I also believe

2008 OK 63 STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association, Complainant, v. GARY DON HAMMOND, Respondent. No. SCBD-5079 Supreme Court of Oklahoma June 24, 2008 Dan Murdock, General Counsel, Michael Wayne Speegle, Assistant General Counsel, OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Complainant. Charles F. Alden III, ALDEN & LEONARD, P.C.,

HULL, Circuit Judge: Appellant Daniel G. Hamm (the “Trustee”), the Trustee in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy cases of Debtors-Appellees Tomeka Scott James, Linda Sankey, and Hope Ho-neycutt (collectively, the “Debtors”), objected to the Debtors’ claims for federal earned income tax credit (“EITC”) exemptions in their individual bankruptcy cases. The bankruptcy court overruled the Trus

158 P.3d 1052 (2007) 2007 OK 28 Sally EMERY, Petitioner, v. CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE, Clarendon National Insurance Company, and the Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents. No. 102,286. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. May 1, 2007. Walt Brune, Walt Brune, P.C., Ponca City, OK, and Fred L. Boettcher and K. Wayne Lee, Boettcher Law Office, Inc.,

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS _________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT September 13, 2012

TUTTLE, Senior Circuit Judge: This is an appeal by Northrup King and Company from a substantial judgment, based on a jury verdict, against it in a diversity action in the district court. I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1. Course of Proceedings and Dispositions in the Court Below This part 1. is agreed to by all parties as satisfying a summary of the course of proceed

157 P.3d 143 (2007) 2007 OK CR 12 Richard Eugene GLOSSIP, Appellant v. STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee. No. D 2005-310. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. April 13, 2007. Silas R. Lyman, II, Wayne Woodyard, Capital Trial Division, Indigent Defense System, Norman, OK, attorneys for defendant at trial. Connie Smothermon, Gary Ackley, Ass

62 Cal.App.3d 677 (1976) 133 Cal. Rptr. 297 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GARVIN KENT EDMONDSON, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. 28235. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One. October 8, 1976. *679 COUNSEL Seymour Phillips, under appointment by the Court of Appe

CARNES, Circuit Judge: This is the latest appeal growing out of the nearly two-decades old, racial discrimination in employment lawsuit involving the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT) and the State Personnel Department (SPD). Those two state agencies were sued in 1985 by what became two plaintiff classes of black employees and prospective employees. A partial settle

817 F.2d 742 James EDMONDSON, Darrill R. Dailey, Eddie York, MichaelAlcone, Franz Rowland, Charles E. Dodd, Jr., MaxWard and Gary Ward, d/b/a Ward Farms, apartnership, and Donald Hiers,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.NORTHRUP KING AND COMPANY, a foreign corporation licensed todo business in the State of Georgia, Defendant-Appellant. No. 86-8584. United States Court of Appeals,

EBEL, Circuit Judge. These death penalty appeals 1 present a number of issues. The most difficult, which we deal with at some length, include: 1) whether the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), by failing to disclose a detective’s unrecorded recollecti

14 B.R. 623 (1981) In re CEDAR CITY ELEVATOR & REFRIGERATION COMPANY, Debtor. NOLAND COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. T. Larry EDMONDSON, Trustee, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 380-02148, Adv. No. 381-0189. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee. September 22, 1981. Gary S. Rubenstein, Nashville, Tenn., for plaintiff. T. Larry Edmondson, Nashville, Tenn., f

OSCN Found Document:IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION2021 OK 36Case Number: SCBD-7059Decided: 06/07/2021THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2021 OK 36, __ P.3d __ FOR PUBLICATION IN

BIRCH, Circuit Judge: This case involves a large-scale conspiracy to import and distribute cocaine from Panama within the United States. The principal evidence against defendants-appellants at trial was the testimony of a former coconspirator who became a government informant. Defendants-appellants challenge their convictions on numerous grounds. After reviewing the record, we

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff RJR Nabisco, Inc. (“Nabisco”) filed an income tax action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia seeking a refund of interest it had paid under protest to the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Nabisco moved for summary judgment, and the government similarly cross-motioned. The district court denied Nabisco’s m

¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellants, employees of the Lake Patrol Division of the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety (Employees), seek review of the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Public Safety (DPS) and Office of Personnel Management (OPM) (collectively State) on Employees' claim for damages arising from State's failure to comply with a statutory directive governing the setting of Employees' salaries. We af