⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Garza v. United Parcel Service, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004-03-15 · Published · cited 168× · 360 F.3d 483; 2004 WL 287141
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge: United Parcel Services’ petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion of the court issued on December 30, 2003, at 353 F.3d 414 (5th Cir.2003), is withdrawn, and the following is substituted: Lorenzo Pineda III brought this retaliation suit under the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act alleging that United
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-04-20 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-014-00494-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013-05-30 · Published · cited 66× · 2013 IL App (5th) 110560; 992 N.E.2d 43
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court Holland v. Schwan’s Home Service, Inc., 2013 IL App (5th) 110560 Appellate Court LARRY W. HOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. SCHWAN’S HOME Caption SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant (The Schwan Food Company, Schwan’s Shared Services, LLC, and Gary Young, Defendants). District & No. Fifth District
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016-07-12 · Published · cited 4× · 240 Ariz. 373; 379 P.3d 1004; 743 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 21; 2016 Ariz. App. LEXIS 170
OPINION JOHNSEN, Judge: ¶ 1 Petitioners challenge the superior court’s order decertifying an 80,000-member class of drivers suing Swift Transportation Co., Inc. For the reasons stated below, we accept jurisdiction of the petition for special action and grant relief. On this record, Swift has failed to show that its various affirmative defenses render the
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2006-03-23 · Published · cited 10× · 187 S.W.3d 45; 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 2257; 2005 WL 2403443
187 S.W.3d 45 (2005) CITGO REFINING AND MARKETING, INC., and Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Appellants, v. Amelia GARZA, et al., Appellees. No. 13-03-267-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. September 30, 2005. Opinion on Rehearing March 23, 2006. *50 Jeffrey K. Sherwood, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hau
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003-12-30 · Published · cited 1× · 353 F.3d 414; 2003 WL 22927712
353 F.3d 414 Lorenzo Pineda, III, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.United Parcel Service, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. No. 03-50268. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Filed December 30, 2003. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Robert Louis Blumenfeld (argued), Mendel & Blumenfeld, El Paso, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004-02-16 · Published · cited 0× · 353 F.3d 414
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D February 16, 2004 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Feasby v. Garzapublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025-12-29 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 Ohio 5786
[Cite as Feasby v. Garza, 2025-Ohio-5786.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PAULDING COUNTY TIMOTHY A. FEASBY, ET AL., CASE NO. 11-25-09 PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOSEPH GARZA, ET AL., OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES. Appeal fro
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002-11-25 · Published · cited 0× · 51 F. App'x 988
ORDER Lidija Siljak, a former employee of Rav-enswood Disposal Service, Inc., filed suit against Ravenswood and Tony Vardijan,1 one of its owners, alleging that she had been sexually harassed on the job. After a *990jury trial the district court entered judgment in favor of the defendants, and Siljak appeals. We affirm. Siljak
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2005-10-06 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued October 6, 2005 In The</
Texas Supreme Court · 1998-09-24 · Published · cited 58× · 979 S.W.2d 318; 1998 WL 389087
ENOCH, Justice, delivered the opinion of the Court, in which PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, SPECTOR, BAKER and ABBOTT, Justices, join. This is an interlocutory appeal from a class-certification order. Residential property owners in Corpus Christi sued several chemical manufacturers and commercial facility owners for property damage from alleged long-term emissions of contaminants. The tr
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2025-05-22 · Published · cited 0×
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-24-00088-CV Bekins Van Lines, Inc. and Willis Permian Movers, Inc., Appellants v. Sherwin Kahn, Appellee FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY NO. 21-1090-CC2, THE HONORABLE LAURA B. BARKER, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINION
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 1998-09-10 · Published · cited 2× · 976 S.W.2d 899; 1998 CCH OSHD 31,669; 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 5821; 1998 WL 687319
976 S.W.2d 899 (1998) Guadalupe GARZA, Appellant, v. DOCTORS ON WILCREST, P.A., Duncan G. Bowell, M.D. and Alan Reichman, M.D., Appellees. No. 14-97-00210-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). September 10, 1998. *900 Clinton E. Wells, Jr., Michael T. Fuerst, Houston, for appellant. Lovell W. Aldrich, David
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-12-16 · Published · cited 21× · 222 S.W.3d 62; 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 10457; 2005 WL 3440794
Case Number: 03-04-00756-CV 03/07/2007 Case stored in record room 03/01/2007 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 01/05/2007 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 12/05/2006 Case forwarded to Court 11/28/2006 Response to Petition for Review waived 10/27/2006 Petition for Review filed 10/27/2006 Appendix Filed Case Number: 03-04-00756-CV 03/07/2007 Case stored in record room 03/01/2007 Notice sent to Court of Appeals 01/05/2007 Petition for Review disposed proceeding denied 12/05/2
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017-03-22 · Published · cited 30× · 528 S.W.3d 644
OPINION Opinion by Justice Burgess This case involves a complicated dispute between Circle Ridge Production, Inc. (Circle Ridge), and Kevin Stephens against Great Northern Energy, Inc. (Great Northern), arising out of the sale and foreclosure of certain oil and gas interests in Harrison County. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in part and reverse in part. I. Introd
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2022-12-05 · Published · cited 0×
Affirmed and Opinion Filed December 5, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00915-CV JAMES R. SNELL, Appellant V. BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CONNECTIONS, INC., UHS OF TIMBERLAWN, INC., UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., AND HEATHER CAWTHON, Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-40109 Document: 223-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-40109 FILED Aug
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-07-19 · Published · cited 18× · 647 F.3d 237; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14701; 2011 WL 2803372
647 F.3d 237 (2011) WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. QORE, INC., Defendant-Appellant. No. 10-60266. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 19, 2011. *240 Roy Michael Northrup (argued), Cowles & Thompson, P.C., Dallas, TX, Raymond L. Brown, Brown Buchanan, P.A., Pascagoula, MS, James Edgar Cow
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011-10-06 · Published · cited 6× · 647 F.3d 237
REVISED October 6, 2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 10-60266 July 19, 2011
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2010-09-23 · Published · cited 19× · 328 S.W.3d 121; 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 7777; 2010 WL 3704928
328 S.W.3d 121 (2010) SJW PROPERTY COMMERCE, INC. n/k/a Leasing Holding, Inc., and Property Commerce Development Company n/k/a Development Holding, Inc., Appellants, v. SOUTHWEST PINNACLE PROPERTIES, INC., Jackson I, Corp., Palmer Enterprise Inc., and G.J. Palmer, Jr., Individually, Appellees. No. 13-08-00268-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. September 23,