Cases

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Efrain Juan-Manuel (defendant) appeals from a final sentence entered in the United States District Court 1 for the District of Nebraska after he pled guilty to one count of illegal reentry into the United States following deportation and one count of transporting an illegal alien. See

By Judge William R. O’Brien This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion to compel. The plaintiffs in this case are Leone Harriet Ashe Jondahl and Rodney Allen Jondahl, the executors of the estate of Bradley Allen Jondahl. They brought this wrongful death action against the defendant, Ronald Julius Gasper, alleging that he was responsible for the death of Bradley Jondahl. (The defendant was already acquitted of cr

2026 WI 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH GASPER, Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. No. 2023AP2319–CR Decided January 14, 2026 REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals. Waukesha County Circuit Court (Shelley J. Gaylord, Reserve J.),

739 F.Supp.2d 1 (2010) Harold D. SCHULER, Plaintiff, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendant. Civil Case No. 05-2355 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 22, 2010. *2 David Louis Rose, Rose Legal Advocates, LLP, Yuval Rubinstein, Terri N. Marcus, Rose & Rose, P.C., Washington, DC, for Plainti

813 F.Supp.2d 45 (2011) C. Westbrook MURPHY and Harold Schuler, Plaintiffs, v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendant. Civil Case. Nos. 02-0982 (RJL), 05-1054 (RJL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 22, 2011. *47 David Louis Rose, Joshua N. Rose, Rose & Rose, P.C., Richard A. Salzman, Douglas B. H

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (“PwC” or “defendant”) moves for dismissal of Plaintiff C. Westbrook Murphy’s (“Murphy” or “plaintiff’) remaining age discrimination claims, brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., <

MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge. This case is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (“PwC” or “defendant”) moves for dismissal of Plaintiff Harold Schuler’s (“Schuler” or “plaintiff’) remaining age discrimination claims, brought under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and th

PER CURIAM. Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge that in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 he possessed stolen property. When sentenced upon this plea the sentencing judge failed to ask appellant if he had anything to say before sentence was pronounced, as required by Rule 32 (a) Fed.R.Crim.Proc. Appellant, however, at

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2249 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States

204 S.W.3d 572 (2005) Rico HAMPTON, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CA CR 03-801. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, IV. March 2, 2005. *574 Christopher W. Hays, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Brent P. Gasper, Ass't Att'y Gen., for appellee. SAM BIRD, Judge. Pursuant to Rule

William J. Regan, S. The will of the above decedent has been offered for probate and Ralph A. Boniello, one of the subscribing witnesses, appeared before the court and gave his"testimony regarding the execution of said will and the capacity of the testator. Kenneth A. De Grasper, attorney for the estate, also testified as to his past relationship with the decedent. From the testimony it appeared that the testat

195 S.W.3d 370 (2004) 88 Ark. App. 91 Earl W. LOY, Appellant v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CACR 03-205. Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions IV, I. October 13, 2004. *372 Kathy L. Hall, Little Rock, for appellant. Mike Beebe, Att'y Gen., by: Brent P. Gasper, Ass't Att'y Gen., Little Rock, f

PER CURIAM. hThe state filed a delinquency petition in the Juvenile Court for the Parish of Orleans charging defendant with distribution of heroin in violation of La.R.S. 40:966(A)(1). After a hearing conducted on September 30, 2010, the court adjudicated defendant delinquent and ordered him committed to the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections for a period not to exceed one year. On appeal, the Fourt

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 361 OPINION This is an appeal from a conviction for murder without malice under the provisions of Article 802c, Vernon's Ann.P.C.; the punishment assessed by the jury, four (4) years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. The deceased, Fred Peebles, was an off-duty, uniforme

ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. Un this criminal appeal, the defendant, Jennifer Gaubert, seeks review of the district court's judgment finding her guilty of criminal mischief, a violation of La. R.S. 14:59. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.1 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND THE CASE On April 5, 2018, Ms. Gaubert went to the Third District Stat

MORRISON, Judge. The offense is unlawful possession of a firearm after being convicted of a felony; the punishment, one year. There are neither formal nor informal bills of exception in the record, and there were no objections to the court’s charge. It was stipulated that appellant had previously been convicted of the offense of burglary on a date which was less than five years prior to the date charged i

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge. hOn 7 April 2011, the state indicted the defendant, Joseph Peters (“Peters”), and codefendants, Derrick Allen (“Allen”) and Jazmun Tolbert (“Tolbert”), with one count of second degree murder.1 Peters pleaded not guilty on 12 May 2011. A hearing on motions was held on 28 October 2011; the trial court found probable cause and denied Peters’ motions to suppress evidence an

Cite as 2025 Ark. 128 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-24-517 Opinion Delivered: September 11, 2025 TIMOTHY CLEVENGER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. 60CR-18-4503] V. HO

OPINION OF THE COURT Patrick H. NeMoyer, J. Plaintiff commenced this action in March 2012 against *422defendants Amy Remmele (hereinafter Remmele or defendant, in the singular) and Peak of Success, LLC, the limited liability corporation of which Remmele is the sole member and by which she does business. The complaint states discrete causes of actio

The opinion of the court was delivered by Moritz, J.: Steven S. Novotny directly appeals his jury convictions of first-degree felony murder and aggravated battery. No-votny argues the district court erred in (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a search of his house; (2) denying his motion to suppress one victim’s identification of him as the shooter; and (3) improperly instructing the j