Cases

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.1 Plaintiffs ask the Court to certify classes and subclasses against Defendant Ubiquiti Networks, Inc.2 for their claims for breach of express warranty and fraudulent

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 23-1169 & 23-1170 ___________ In re: The Hertz Corporation, et al., Reorganized Debtors Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee Appellant v. The Hertz Corporatio

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 23-1169 ___________ In re: The Hertz Corporation, et al., Reorganized Debtors Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee Appellant v. The Hertz Corporation; Do

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ Nos. 23-1169 & 23-1170 ___________ In re: The Hertz Corporation, et al., Reorganized Debtors Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee Appellant in 23-1169 v. The Hertz Corporation; Doll

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 23-1169 ___________ In re: The Hertz Corporation, et al., Reorganized Debtors Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee Appellant v. The Hertz Corporation; Do

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-1223 _______________ RALPH TREY JOHNSON; CLAUDIA RUIZ; JACOB WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR; NICHOLAS LABELLA; ALEXA COOKE, STEPHANIE KERKELES; RHESA FOSTER; ESTEBAN SUAREZ; ZACHARY HARRIS; LAURA HAMILTON; MATTHEW SCHMIDT; LIAM WALSH; GINA SNYDER; TAMARA SCHOEN, Individually and on

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _______________ No. 22-1223 _______________ RALPH TREY JOHNSON; CLAUDIA RUIZ; JACOB WILLEBEEK-LEMAIR; NICHOLAS LABELLA; ALEXA COOKE, STEPHANIE KERKELES; RHESA FOSTER; ESTEBAN SUAREZ; ZACHARY HARRIS; LAURA HAMILTON; MATTHEW SCHMIDT; LIAM WALSH; GINA SNYDER; TAMARA SCHOEN, Individually and on

ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I agree with the Majority that we incorrectly interpreted 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e) on at least five occasions: Wofford v. Scott, 177 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 1999), Gilbert v. United States, 640 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2011) (en banc), Williams v. Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 713 F.3d 1332 (11th Cir. 2013), Bryant v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Medium, </

30 Cal.Rptr.3d 76 (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148 113 P.3d 1100 DISCOVER BANK, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of Los Angeles, Respondent; Christopher Boehr, Real Party in Interest. No. S113725. Supreme Court of California. June 27, 2005. *77 Kirkland & Ellis, Jeffrey S. Davidson, Rick

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0124p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT GARY B., JESSIE K., CRISTOPHER R., ISAIAS R., ┐ ESMERALDA V., PAUL M., and JAIME R., minors, │ Plaintiffs-Appellants, │

504 F.Supp.2d 464 (2007) Heidi BROWN, and Heidi Brown as Parent and Next Friend of Trevor Rhiner, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Dr. Paul KERKHOFF; Kerkhoff Chiropractic; The Masters Circle; Dr. Larry Markson; Dr. Bob Hoffman; Dr. Dennis Perman; and John Does, Defendants. No. 4:06-cv-00342-JEG. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.</

05/06/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 4, 2021 Session CORINIO PRUITT v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 06-00460 Chris Craft, Judge __________

*581OPINION REBECCA BEACH SMITH, CHIEF JUDGE This matter comes before the court on the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct a Sentence (“Motion”), filed by David Anthony Runyon (“Petitioner”) on February 4, 2016. ECF No. 511.1 Further before the court are the Petitioner’s First Motion for Discover

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION L. SCOTT COOGLER, District Judge. This is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner Walter Leroy Moody (“Moody”), now incarcerated at Holman Prison in Atmore, Alabama. Moody challenges the validity of his 1996 convictions for capital murder and first degree assault and sentences of death and life without parole in connection with the Decemb

Justice LEE, opinion of the Court in part: 1 1 William Bolden is the putative father of a child (J.S.) born in 2011. The case before us on appeal is an adoption proceeding involving John and Jane Doe, the would-be adoptive parents of J.S. Bolden tried to intervene in and object to the Does' adoption of J.S. He was barred from doing so because he failed to preserve his legal rights as a father by filing a p

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 51 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ——————— In the Matter of the Adoption of J.S., a minor child. ——————— WILLIAM E. BOLDEN, Appellant and Intervenor,

This opinion is subject to revision before final publication in the Pacific Reporter 2014 UT 51 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH ——————— In the Matter of the Adoption of J.S., a minor child. ——————— WILLIAM E. BOLDEN, Appellant and Intervenor, v.

253 Wis.2d 721 (2002) 2002 WI App 87 643 N.W.2d 809 Anthony HICKS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Willie J. NUNNERY, Defendant-Appellant.[†] No. 01-0751. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs October 5, 2001. Decided March 28, 2002. *730 On behalf

ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT CONVICTIONS AND SENTENCES LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................962 II. BACKGROUND.........................................................962 A. Underlying Criminal Proceedings....................................962

URBIGKIT, Justice, Retired, dissenting. What this decision determines is that Wyoming citizens have no judicially enforced protection from the surreptitious acquisition of, and disclosure of: to whom and from whom telephone calls are made. The warrantless use of pen registers and dialed number recorders is legitimatized despite the desired privacy interests of the telephone user. This decision