⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gaye v. Gonzales”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-06-09 · Published · cited 45× · 788 F.3d 519; 2015 FED App. 0115P; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 9584; 2015 WL 3555937
HELENE N. WHITE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. DISSENT I do not agree that we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision insofar as it concluded that Gaye failed to show that his application for asylum was timely under 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) and rejected his due-process claim. Further, I conclude the BIA erred when it relied on IJ Holt’s credibility findings, and would remand for a proper d
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-02-08 · Published · cited 3× · 25 F.4th 38
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 17-1867 MIRIAM IXCUNA-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND,* Attorney General, Respondent. PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ORDER OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS Before Thompson and Kayatta, Circuit
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2018-10-25 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued October 25, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00565-CV ——————————— SAMUEL J. BURLESON, Appellant V. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, ET AL.,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023-09-01 · Published · cited 5× · 81 F.4th 629
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0205p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ YI ZHANG LIN, │ Petition
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2005-08-12 · Published · cited 89× · 170 S.W.3d 676
170 S.W.3d 676 (2005) The STATE of Texas, Appellant, v. Robert BLANKENSHIP, Appellee. Nos. 03-03-00287-CR to 03-03-00294-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. June 29, 2005. Rehearing Overruled August 12, 2005. *678 Gaye Lynn Brewer, Austin, for Appellant. Terrence L. Irion, Anatole R. Barnstone, Law Offi
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-06-07 · Published · cited 3× · 651 F. App'x 427
OPINION SARGUS, District Judge. Miguel Ibarra-Reina petitions for review from a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (the “Board”). For the reasons stated below, we DENY REVIEW. *429I. Petitioner Miguel Ibarra-Reina (“Petitioner” or “Ibarra-Reina”) is a native and a citizen of Mexic
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015-12-03 · Published · cited 0× · 632 F. App'x 824
SILER, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Francisco Cruz-Ibarra seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his application for withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”) and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). For the reasons stated below, we'DENY Cruz-Ibarra’s petition. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Cruz-Ibarra, a Mex
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-11-13 · Published · cited 15× · 980 F.3d 365
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1360 MOKORYA COSMAS WAMBURA, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: September 11, 2020 Decided: November 13, 2
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019-03-13 · Published · cited 20× · 918 F.3d 498
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Approximately six weeks before Rogelio Mendoza-Garcia's final removal hearing, his attorney warned him that he needed to comply with the terms of their retainer agreement-that is, to pay the attorney. Mendoza-Garcia did not pay and, one week before the hearing, his attorney filed a *502motion to withdraw. The imm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-09-18 · Published · cited 27× · 904 F.3d 427
SUTTON, Circuit Judge. Wissam Ibrahim Al-Saka received permanent residency on the condition that he remain married to Hanadi Hashem, a U.S. citizen, for at least two years. He ran afoul of that condition when Michigan annulled the marriage months after he arrived here. The immigration authorities refused to waive the condition, found that Al-Saka and Hashem did not marry in good faith,
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016-10-20 · Published · cited 9× · 840 F.3d 281; 2016 FED App. 0260P; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 18860; 2016 WL 6122773
OPINION DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Roselyne Marikasi (“Marika-si”) appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of her asylum petition. On August 20, 2014, an IJ denied Marikasi’s application for asylum, withholding of removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018-10-01 · Published · cited 55× · 905 F.3d 729
FUENTES, Circuit Judge. This case concerns the Board of Immigration Appeals' failure to follow precedent set forth by this Court. 1 Alejandro Misael Melendez Saravia ("Saravia") petitions for review of the Board's decision affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of his application for with
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021-01-07 · Published · cited 91× · 984 F.3d 1142
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0005p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT AVTAR SINGH, ┐ Petitioner, │ │
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015-10-08 · Published · cited 0× · 804 F.3d 1208; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 17617; 2015 WL 5868309
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. Bayanmunkh Darinchuluun filed an application for asylum in which he claimed that he had been persecuted in his native Mongolia as a result of his attempts to bring to light an illegal smuggling operation. Following a hearing, an immigration judge (“IJ”) found that Mr. Darinchuluun was credible, but that he had failed to offer sufficient corroborating evid
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-04-03 · Published · cited 133× · 954 F.3d 757
Case: 18-60421 Document: 00515371924 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED April 3, 2020 No. 18-60421
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2005-09-29 · Published · cited 5× · 466 F. Supp. 2d 799; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 40660; 2005 WL 2415965
466 F.Supp.2d 799 (2005) Karen F. HICKS and Benny J. Hicks, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES PFIZER & COMPANY INC. aka Charles Pfizer & Company, Pfizer, Ltd. aka Charles Pfizer Ltd., and Pfizer Inc. aka Pfizer, individually and as successor in interest to Charles Pfizer & Company and Pfizer, Ltd., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 1:04-CV-201. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division.<
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2012-04-13 · Published · cited 10× · 470 B.R. 149; 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 1671; 2012 WL 1252687
470 B.R. 149 (2012) In re Levi A. KINDERKNECHT, Debtor. Linda S. Parks, Trustee, Plaintiff, Kansas Attorney General Derek Schmidt, Intervenor v. Persels and Associates, LLC and Stan Goodwin, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09-13443. Adversary No. 10-5209. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas. April 13, 2012. *155 Gaye B.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-07-24 · Published · cited 95× · 896 F.3d 1033
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GLACIER FILMS (USA), INC.; No. 16-35688 GLACIER FILMS 1, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-01817- v. SB ANDREY TURCHIN, FKA Doe- 73.164.151.227, OPINION Defendant-Appellee.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-04-13 · Published · cited 12× · 236 F.R.D. 9; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18998; 2006 WL 1000343
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BATES, District Judge. Defendant Société Air France (“Air France”) has moved to strike the designation of plaintiffs two expert witnesses or, in the alternative, to compel plaintiff to file expert reports pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)(B). Plaintiff contends that the two expert witnesses are her treating physicians and, as such, are not required to provide expert reports.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005-03-17 · Published · cited 9× · 322 B.R. 509; 2005 Bankr. LEXIS 424; 2005 WL 638285
322 B.R. 509 (2005) In re ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Devon Mobile Communications Liquidating Trust, Plaintiffs, v. Adelphia Communications Corporation, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 02-41729 (REG). Adversary No. 04-03192. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. March 17, 2005. *514 Young