Cases

RADER, Circuit Judge. Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco (d/b/a Cu-batabaco) challenges the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s grant of summary judgment to General Cigar Co., Inc. on the basis that Cubatabaco — a Cuban company — lacks standing to seek cancellation of General Cigar’s two registrations for the trademark COHIBA (the Registrations). Because this court finds that Cubatabaco

(2008) EMPRESA CUBANA DEL TABACO d/b/a Cubatabaco, Plaintiff, v. CULBRO CORPORATION and General Cigar Co., Inc., Defendants. No. 97 Civ. 8399. United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 19, 2008. OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff Empresa Cubana del Tabaco, d/b/a Cubatabaco ("Plaintiff" or "Cubatabaco") has moved pursu

478 F.Supp.2d 513 (2007) EMPRESA CUBANA DEL TABACO d.b.a. Cubatabaco, Plaintiff, v. CULBRO CORPORATION and General Cigar Co., Inc., Defendants. No. 97 Civ. 8399(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. March 14, 2007. *514 *515 Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky & Lieberman, P

399 F.3d 462 EMPRESA CUBANA DEL TABACO, doing business as Cubatabaco, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,v.CULBRO CORPORATION, Defendant-Counter-Claimant,General Cigar Co., Inc. and General Cigar Holdings, Inc. Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Docket No. 04-2527-CV(L). Docket No. 04-3005-CV (XAP). United States Court of

STRAUB, Circuit Judge. Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appel-lants-Cross-Appellees, General Cigar Co., Inc., and General Cigar Holdings, Inc. (“General Cigar”), appeal from a judgment and permanent injunction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Robert W. Sweet, Judge), entered on May 6, 2004, finding in favor of Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Ap-pellee-Cross-Appellant, Empresa Cubana del Tabaco,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BACARDI & COMPANY LIMITED, and BACARDI U.S.A., INC., Plaintiffs, v. EMPRESA CUBANA EXPORTADORA Case No. 1:04-cv-00519 (EGS) DE ALIMENTOS Y PRODUCTOS VARIOS d/b/a CUBAEXPORT, and HAVANA CLUB HOLDING, S.A., d/b/a HCH, S.A., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Bacardi & Company Limited and Bacardi U.S.A., Incorporated

THIS OPINION IS A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Oral Hearing Held: February 1, 2022 Mailed: December 20, 2022 U NIT ED S T ATES P AT ENT A ND T RADEMARK O FFICE Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ———— Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco d.b.a. Cubatabaco v. General Ciga

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Plaintiff Empresa Cubana del Tabaco d/b/a Cubatabaco (“Cubatabaco”) has moved (1) to strike the Eighth Affirmative Defense of defendant General Cigar Co. (“General Cigar”) pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (2) to preclude the trial testimony of Marvin Shanken, the editor and publisher of Cigar Aficionado; and (3) to preclude th

988 F.Supp. 647 (1997) GENERAL CIGAR CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. G.D.M. INC. d/b/a Global Direct Marketing and Raymond Parker, Defendants. No. 97 Civ. 7783(RWS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 18, 1997. *648 *649 *650 Morgan & Finneg

205 F.Supp.2d 1335 (2002) GENERAL CIGAR HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALTADIS, S.A.; Altadis U.S.A., Inc.; and Consolidated Cigar Holdings Inc., Defendants. No. 00-4187CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. June 12, 2002. *1336 *1337 *1338 Robert

Case: 21-2209 Document: 34 Page: 1 Filed: 06/29/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MEENAXI ENTERPRISE, INC., Appellant v. COCA-COLA COMPANY, Appellee ______________________ 2021-2209 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and

Case: 23-2140 Document: 74 Page: 1 Filed: 05/22/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REBECCA CURTIN, Appellant v. UNITED TRADEMARK HOLDINGS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2023–2140 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent an

This Opinion is Not a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: January 30, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Luxco, Inc. v.

(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF MARKETQUEST'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 205]; (2) DENYING DEFENDANT BIC CORP.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 216]; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS BIC USA AND NORWOOD'S MOTION

This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB Hearing: Mailed: December 7, 2016 June 21, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____

MIRANDA M. DU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. SUMMARY The dispute stems from the breakup of a business and disagreement over the terms of a subsequent settlement agreement. Before the Court are three motions: (1) Defendants and Counterclaimants David M. Semas ("Semas"), Metalast International, Inc. ("the Inc."), Metalast Inc. ("MI"), and Sierra Dorado, Inc.'s ("Sierra Dorado") (collectively, "Meta

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: Defendant Michael Robertson1 moves for judgment as a matter of law, or alternatively a new trial, and for remittitur following a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs.2 Plaintiffs, consisting of record companies (“Labels”) and music publishers (“Publishers”), filed this federal and s

521 F.Supp.2d 188 (2007) S&L VITAMINS, INC., Plaintiff, v. AUSTRALIAN GOLD, INC., Defendant. No. 05-CV-1217 (JS)(MLO). United States District Court, E.D. New York. September 30, 2007. *189 *190 *191 *192

This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: June 28, 2021 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ The Coca-Cola Company

This Opinion Is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: June 28, 2021 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ The Coca-Cola Company