Cases

898 F.Supp. 928 (1995) Judith ELDRED, Plaintiff, v. CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF DELAWARE, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 93-30095-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. August 31, 1995. *929 Thomas J. Oppenheimer, Springfield, MA, for plaintiff. Richard U. Stubbs, Jr., Skoler, Abbott, Hayes & Presser,

331 F.Supp. 626 (1971) GASTOWN, INC. OF DELAWARE, d.b.a. Gastown, Inc., Plaintiff, v. GASTOWN, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 13504. United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 16, 1971. Albert L. Ely, Jr., Ely, Golrick & Flynn, Cleveland, Ohio, John M. Prutzman, Prutzman, Hayes, Kalb & Chilton, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiff. William E. Gly

CYR, Circuit Judge. Between 1988 and 1990, appellants Robert Howard and Scott Robb held FCC licenses to operate several radio stations through two closely-held companies, Howard Communications Corporation and Citi-com Radio of Pittsfield [hereinafter collectively, the “Companies”]. 1 In 1990, the

122 B.R. 845 (1990) In re CHORUS DATA SYSTEMS, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 90-10614. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire. December 14, 1990. *846 Michael J. Scott, Michels & Michels, Londonderry, N.H., for Chorus Data Systems, Inc. David Sears, Law Offices of Daniel W. Sklar, P.C., Manchester, N.H., for BankEast.

569 F.Supp. 990 (1983) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., and American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-0192. Misc. No. 82-0025 (PI). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 20, 1983.<

437 F.Supp. 1083 (1977) ARASERV, INC. v. BAY STATE HARNESS HORSE RACING AND BREEDING ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. Civ. A. No. 77-0343-F. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 7, 1977. *1084 A. Theodore Welburn, Gravill & Ley Inc., Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. Allen E. Erickson, Town Counsel, Foxborough, Ma

473 F.Supp.2d 89 (2007) Ronald HARDING, Plaintiff, v. CIANBRO CORPORATION, Defendant. No. CV-04-158-B-W. United States District Court, D. Maine. January 11, 2007. Jeffrey Neil Young, Stephanie E.F. Jazlowiecki, McTeague, Higbee, Case, Cohen, *90 Whitney & Toker, PA., Topsham, ME, for Plaintiff. Ella L. Brown, Katharine

Spina, J. The present case concerns the way by which the costs of financing the Greater New Bedford Regional Vocational Technical High School District (school district) are apportioned among the city of New Bedford, the town of Dartmouth, and the town of Fairhaven, which are the municipalities comprising the school district (collectively, the member municipalities). In February, 2008, Dartmouth commenced an action in the Superio

545 F.3d 114 (2008) VACOLD LLC, Immunotherapy, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Anthony CERAMI, Carla Cerami, VLN LLC and Cerami Consulting Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 07-0050-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: March 14, 2008. Decided: October 2, 2008. *115 Franklin B. Ve

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARVIN E. ASPEN, District Judge Plaintiffs, eleven deaf or hard of hearing prisoners, brought this proposed class action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Defendant Salvador A. Godinez, the Acting Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC” or the “Department”). Plaintiffs allege that IDOC has denied them hearing accommodat

Hely, J. I. INTRODUCTION G.L.c. 40, sec. 57, establishes a procedure through which a city or town may deny a building permit or other local license if the party seeking the permit or license has “neglected or refused to pay” any local taxes or fees for twelve months or more. Under the statute, a permit for a tax delinquent person or entity may be denied even if the unpaid taxes are due on property that is not t

07-0050-cv Vacold LLC v. Cerami 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2007 5 6 7 (Argued: March 14, 2008 Decided: October 2, 2008) 8 9 Docket No. 07-0050-cv 10 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 VACOLD LLC, IMMUNOTHERA

USCA1 Opinion December 9, 1992 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ ____________________ No. 92-1524 No. 92-1524 RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL TRUST NATIONAL BANK, RHODE I

4/December 2006—MDC Court Michigan Supreme Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Wea

4/December 2006—MDC Court Michigan Supreme Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Opinion Clifford W. Taylor Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Wea

OPINION FRANK J. MURRAY, Senior District Judge. The Trustees of the Debtor in reorganization, the Boston and Maine Corporation (“B & M”), filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission (“Commission”) in December 1975 their plan of reorganization, and subsequently amended the plan on December 29,1980, again on July 15,1981 and finally on March 3, 1982. The Commission on April 23, 1982 approved the plan

23 B.R. 823 (1982) In re D.H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO., INC., Debtor. HADAR LEASING INTERNATIONAL CO., INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. D.H. OVERMYER TELECASTING CO., INC., et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. B81-00506, Adv. No. B81-1005. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D. September 17, 1982. Judgment September 24, 1982.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 502 Bill in equity by beneficiaries of an investment trust against the trustee for alleged breach of trust in connection with certain loans of the trust funds. The appeal is from a final decree for complainants surcharging these investments, and restoring the funds to the trust estate in the hands of the truste

41 F.Supp. 727 (1941) ALLEN BRADLEY CO. et al. v. LOCAL UNION NO. 3, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, et al. District Court, S. D. N. Y. September 30, 1941. *728 McLanahan, Merritt & Ingraham, of New York City, for plaintiffs. Frank P. Walsh and Harold Stern, both of New York City, for defendants. LEIBELL, Distri

LOVETT, District Judge. The main question now for decision is whether a long term lease of a railroad must expressly, directly and in words provide for the payment of federal taxes on income from rentals to justify the imposition of such a burden on the lessee. The issue arises in this way: The debt- or, a Georgia corporation, is being reorganized under section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 205.