⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “General Motors LLC v. Mitchell International, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 33× · 143 F.4th 306
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0170p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN │ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024-05-21 · Published · cited 34× · 102 F.4th 772
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0115p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ DOUGLAS MILCZAK, │ Plaintiff-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-09-07 · Published · cited 192× · 81 F.4th 242
21-2640-cv Billie R. Banks v. General Motors, LLC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2022 (Argued: December 6, 2022 Decided: September 7, 2023) Docket No. 21-2640 BILLIE R. BANKS, Plai
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-06-30 · Published · cited 75× · 257 F. Supp. 3d 372
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: [Regarding New GM’s Partial Motion To Dismiss the Fourth Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint] INTRODUCTION .. .391 BACKGROUND .. .392 LEGAL STANDARDS .. .394 DISCUSSION .. .395 A. Brand Devaluation Claims... .395 B. Damages for L
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2024-09-20 · Published · cited 0× · 254 N.E.3d 947; 2024 IL App (1st) 230868
2024 IL App (1st) 230868 No. 1-23-0868 Order filed September 20, 2024 FIFTH DIVISION IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT SCOTT BOHABOY,
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-08-15 · Published · cited 0× · 202 F. Supp. 3d 362; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108405
*363OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: The next bellwether trial in this multi-district litigation (“MDL”), familiarity with which is presumed, involves claims brought by Plaintiff Stephanie Cockram against General Motors LLC (also known as “New GM”) stemming from a June 28, 2011 car accident. At the time of the accide
District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 135 F. Supp. 3d 451; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130799; 2015 WL 5781507
Opinion and Order Bruce Howe Hendricks, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on the motion of the plaintiff, Choice Hotels International, Inc., for summary judgment (ECF No. 58). The Court held a hearing on the motion on August 18, 2015, and has considered the parties’ briefing in support and opposition. For the reasons set forth herein the Court grants the motion for su
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2019-08-12 · Published · cited 2× · 2019 IL App (3d) 170629
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Illinois Official Reports Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024-08-21 · Published · cited 0×
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court Beverly Dale Jolly and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. Fisher Controls International, LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC, Petitioners. Appellate Case No. 2022-000272 ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS Appeal from Spartanburg County Jean Hoefer Toal, Acting Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 28233 Heard February 6, 2024 – Filed August 21, 202
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022-08-31 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 31, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ Nos. 3D21-929, 3D21-1001 Lower Tribunal No. 17-25120 ________________ VME Group International, LLC, etc., et al., Appel
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2026-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, and GENERAL FOR PUBLICATION MOTORS COMPANY, May 11, 2026 11:42 AM Plaintiffs
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-12 · Published · cited 16× · 339 F. Supp. 3d 262
[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010-10-14 · Published · cited 19× · 749 F. Supp. 2d 1235; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113024; 2010 WL 4340806
749 F.Supp.2d 1235 (2010) GUIDANCE ENDODONTICS, LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware Business Corporation, and Tulsa Dental Products, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants, and Dentsply International, Inc. and Tulsa Dental Products, LLC, Counter Plaintiffs, v. Guidance Endodontics, LLC and Dr. Charles Goodis, Counter Defendants. No. CI
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020-03-02 · Published · cited 161× · 952 F.3d 124
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2030 ANTHONY M. FIDRYCH; PATRICIA ANNE FIDRYCH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, Distr
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2010-07-01 · Published · cited 1× · 728 F. Supp. 2d 1170; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71305; 2010 WL 2985851
728 F.Supp.2d 1170 (2010) GUIDANCE ENDODONTICS, LLC, a New Mexico Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. DENTSPLY INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Delaware Business Corporation, and Tulsa Dental Products, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Defendants. and Dentsply International, Inc. and Tulsa Dental Products, LLC, Counter Plaintiffs, v. Guidance Endodontics, LLC and Dr. Charles Goodis, Counter Defendants. No. CIV
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-07-22 · Published · cited 0×
07/22/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 20, 2019 Session CAROLYN COFFMAN ET AL. v. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 2-485-14 William T. Ailor, Jud
District Court, D. Delaware · 2017-06-01 · Published · cited 0× · 254 F. Supp. 3d 680; 2017 WL 2385604; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83832
MEMORANDUM OPINION Sue L. Robinson, Senior District Judge 1. INTRODUCTION On September 4, 2013, plaintiff SRI International, Inc. (“SRI”) filed suit against defendant Cisco Systems Inc. (“Cisco”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,711,615 (“the ’615 patent”) and 6,484,203 (“the ’203 patent”) (collectively, “the patents”). (D.I. 1) On December 18, 2013, Cisco answered the complaint
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 4× · 816 F.3d 721; 117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1817; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 2452
DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting, with whom Circuit Judge HUGHES, joins. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding that Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed.Cir. 1992), and Jazz Photo Corp. v. International Trade Commission, 264 F.3d 1094 (Fed.Cir.2001), remain good law. First, I agree with the government that Mallinck-rodt was wrong
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018-01-22 · Published · cited 0× · 305 F. Supp. 3d 1256
JAMES A. PARKER, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Defendants Colin Mitchell (Mitchell), NEXTracker (NX), Marco Garcia (Garcia), Daniel S. Shugar (Shugar), Scott Graybeal (Graybeal), and Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flextronics) ask the Court to dismiss Counts Three through Ten of Plaintiff Array Technologies, Inc.'s (ATI's) AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 52).1
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016-02-12 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant QUALITY CARTRIDGES, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-20, BLUE TRADING LLC, EXPRINT INTERNATIONAL, INC., LD PRODUCTS, INC., PRINTRONIC CORPORATION, TESEN DEVELOPMENT (HONG KONG) CO. LTD., BENIGNO ADEVA AND HIS