Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “General Star Indemnity Company v. Lopez”
SALTER, J. General Star Indemnity Company, a commercial property insurer, seeks a writ of certiorari quashing two discovery orders. Atlantic Hospitality of Florida, LLC, is General Star’s insured and is the respondent. Simply stated, Atlantic Hospitality obtained orders compelling two senior officers1 of General Star to appear for deposition in a windstorm insurance case. General Star filed an affi
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-403-CV CANTU SERVICES, INC., A TEXAS APPELLANT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION<
Cantu Services v. General Star COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-403-CV CANTU SERVICES, INC., A TEXAS APPELLANT
BENTON, Circuit Judge. General Mills Operations, LLC purchased meatballs from Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd. After delivery and use of the meatballs, Five Star’s supplier of ground beef issued a recall. Accordingly, General Mills destroyed its products containing the meatballs. It sued Five Star for breach of contract and breach of warranties. The district court
Casto Lopez Concrete, LLC, Venancio Lopez, Individually, and Casto Lopez, Individually v. Sage Commercial Group, LLCpublic domain
Vacated and Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00734-CV CASTO LOPEZ CONCRETE, LLC, VENANCIO LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CASTO LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants V. SAGE COMMERCIAL GROUP, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 133rd District Court
Shawn Murphy v. Fairbanks North Star Boroughpublic domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA SHAWN MURPHY, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-17530
Star Operations, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company of New York v. Dig Tech, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00423-CV 7966631 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST
Lopez v. Rutgers Cas. Ins. Co.public domain
SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, United States District Judge I. Introduction On or about March 7, 2016, plaintiff Gerver Lopez ("plaintiff") commenced this action against defendant Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ("defendant") in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau ("the state court"), seeking to convert an unsatisfied judgment entered in the state court on October 21, 2015 against, inter alia<
Sentry Select Insurance Co. v. Lopezpublic domain
ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Duty to Indemnify (“Motion”), ECF No. 78, in the above-captioned case. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The basic factual contours of this case, including the facts surro
Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Lopezpublic domain
Opinion SEGAL, J. * INTRODUCTION Insurance Code section 533.5, subdivision (b), 1 precludes insurers from providing a defense for certain kinds of claims. The statute provides: “No policy of insurance shall provide,
Pulte Home Corp. v. American Safety Indemnity Co.public domain
Filed 8/30/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PULTE HOME CORPORATION, D070478 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 2013-00050682-CU- IC-CTL) AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY COMP
Mt. Hawley Ins. Co. v. Lopezpublic domain
Filed 5/29/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE B234082 COMPANY, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC434879) v.
Star Enterprise v. Marzepublic domain
61 S.W.3d 449 (2001) STAR ENTERPRISE, Texaco Refining & Marketing (East), Inc., and Saudi Refining, Inc., Appellants, v. Mary Ann MARZE, individually, and as surviving widow of, community survivor of, and personal representative of Windel B. Marze, Lori Ann Marze and Scott Windel Marze, surviving children, and Pacific Employer's Insurance, Appellees. No. 04-00-00433-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, S
Opinion IRION, J. — The parties cross-appeal from a final judgment of the superior court in an insurance coverage dispute between a general contractor (and, according to the general contractor, its related entities) and the commercial general liability insurer of one of its subcontractors. We will dismiss the ap
Illinois Casualty Company v. Jessica Burciagapublic domain
FILED Jun 10 2024, 1:40 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE Indiana Supreme Court Supreme Court Case No. 23S-PL-180
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. § Appellant, No. 08-17-00119-CV § v.
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. § Appellant, No. 08-17-00119-CV § v.
USCA11 Case: 22-10740 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 04/13/2023 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10740 ____________________ ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Tessc
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1860 Lower Tribunal No. 22-602 ________________ Catalina West Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellant,
838 F.2d 612 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.Hector Manuel Rodriguez-Estrada, Defendant, Appellant.CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Def