⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “General Star Indemnity Company v. Lopez”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011-03-09 · Published · cited 2× · 57 So. 3d 238; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 3201; 2011 WL 798909
SALTER, J. General Star Indemnity Company, a commercial property insurer, seeks a writ of certiorari quashing two discovery orders. Atlantic Hospitality of Florida, LLC, is General Star’s insured and is the respondent. Simply stated, Atlantic Hospitality obtained orders compelling two senior officers1 of General Star to appear for deposition in a windstorm insurance case. General Star filed an affi
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-403-CV CANTU SERVICES, INC., A TEXAS APPELLANT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION<
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2003-09-25 · Published · cited 0×
Cantu Services v. General Star COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2-02-403-CV CANTU SERVICES, INC., A TEXAS APPELLANT
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013-01-07 · Published · cited 60× · 703 F.3d 1104; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 444; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 365; 2013 WL 57872
BENTON, Circuit Judge. General Mills Operations, LLC purchased meatballs from Five Star Custom Foods, Ltd. After delivery and use of the meatballs, Five Star’s supplier of ground beef issued a recall. Accordingly, General Mills destroyed its products containing the meatballs. It sued Five Star for breach of contract and breach of warranties. The district court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2022-06-02 · Published · cited 0×
Vacated and Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 2, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-20-00734-CV CASTO LOPEZ CONCRETE, LLC, VENANCIO LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CASTO LOPEZ, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants V. SAGE COMMERCIAL GROUP, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 133rd District Court
Alaska Supreme Court · 2021-09-03 · Published · cited 10× · 494 P.3d 556
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA SHAWN MURPHY, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-17530
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00423-CV 7966631 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST
District Court, E.D. New York · 2018-01-18 · Published · cited 2× · 298 F. Supp. 3d 503
SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, United States District Judge I. Introduction On or about March 7, 2016, plaintiff Gerver Lopez ("plaintiff") commenced this action against defendant Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company ("defendant") in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau ("the state court"), seeking to convert an unsatisfied judgment entered in the state court on October 21, 2015 against, inter alia<
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2017-03-14 · Published · cited 1× · 241 F. Supp. 3d 777; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149745; 2017 WL 1077065
ORDER KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On this day, the Court considered Plaintiff Sentry Select Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Duty to Indemnify (“Motion”), ECF No. 78, in the above-captioned case. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND The basic factual contours of this case, including the facts surro
California Court of Appeal · 2013-05-01 · Published · cited 88× · 215 Cal. App. 4th 1385; 156 Cal. Rptr. 3d 771; 2013 WL 1818627; 2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 346
Opinion SEGAL, J. * INTRODUCTION Insurance Code section 533.5, subdivision (b), 1 precludes insurers from providing a defense for certain kinds of claims. The statute provides: “No policy of insurance shall provide,
California Court of Appeal · 2017-08-30 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 8/30/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PULTE HOME CORPORATION, D070478 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. 2013-00050682-CU- IC-CTL) AMERICAN SAFETY INDEMNITY COMP
California Court of Appeal · 2013-05-29 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/29/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE B234082 COMPANY, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. BC434879) v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2001-08-06 · Published · cited 53× · 61 S.W.3d 449; 2001 WL 432622
61 S.W.3d 449 (2001) STAR ENTERPRISE, Texaco Refining & Marketing (East), Inc., and Saudi Refining, Inc., Appellants, v. Mary Ann MARZE, individually, and as surviving widow of, community survivor of, and personal representative of Windel B. Marze, Lori Ann Marze and Scott Windel Marze, surviving children, and Pacific Employer's Insurance, Appellees. No. 04-00-00433-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, S
California Court of Appeal · 2015-01-22 · Published · cited 41× · 233 Cal. App. 4th 518; 183 Cal. Rptr. 3d 26
Opinion IRION, J. — The parties cross-appeal from a final judgment of the superior court in an insurance coverage dispute between a general contractor (and, according to the general contractor, its related entities) and the commercial general liability insurer of one of its subcontractors. We will dismiss the ap
Indiana Supreme Court · 2024-06-10 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Jun 10 2024, 1:40 pm CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court IN THE Indiana Supreme Court Supreme Court Case No. 23S-PL-180
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2018-08-02 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. § Appellant, No. 08-17-00119-CV § v.
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2018-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC. § Appellant, No. 08-17-00119-CV § v.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023-04-13 · Published · cited 64× · 65 F.4th 1261
USCA11 Case: 22-10740 Document: 33-1 Date Filed: 04/13/2023 Page: 1 of 22 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-10740 ____________________ ASPEN AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Tessc
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1860 Lower Tribunal No. 22-602 ________________ Catalina West Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellant,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988-02-09 · Published · cited 112× · 838 F.2d 612
838 F.2d 612 CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.Hector Manuel Rodriguez-Estrada, Defendant, Appellant.CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellant,v.UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, Appellee,v.UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Def