⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “George W. Jackson”

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) · 2013-05-17 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-12-00233-CR GEORGE W. JACKSON, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 140th District Court Lubbock County, Texas
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995-05-24 · Published · cited 0× · 49 Ark. App. 139; 898 S.W.2d 479; 1995 Ark. App. LEXIS 250
Melvin Mayfield, Judge. In this worker’s compensation case the appellee’s husband, an employee of appellant, committed suicide on January 11, 1992. The administrative law judge held that the death was not compensable because of Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-401 (a)(2) (1987), which provides: However, there shall be no liability for compensation under this chapte
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, November 10, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0048. GEORGE W. SCHRAM v. SANDRA L. JACKSON et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: 14CV0198 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018-01-22 · Published · cited 19× · 880 F.3d 165
DUNCAN, Circuit Judge: Third-Party Defendant - Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., filed a Petition for Permission to Appeal the district court’s order remanding this case to state court. This court deferred ruling on Home Depot’s Petition for Permission to Appeal pending consideration of the merits of the appeal. Home Depot argues that it is entitled to remove the class action counterclai
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-08-05 · Published · cited 1× · 140 S. Ct. 17; 204 L. Ed. 2d 1172
Petition for rehearing denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2019-05-28 · Published · cited 750× · 587 U.S. 435; 139 S. Ct. 1743; 204 L. Ed. 2d 34; 2019 U.S. LEXIS 3558
Justice THOMAS delivered the opinion of the Court. *1745 The general removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (a), provides that "any civil action" over which a fed
Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-09-27 · Published · cited 0× · 139 S. Ct. 51; 201 L. Ed. 2d 1129
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit granted. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: Should this Court's holding in Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100,
Jackson County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016-06-15 · Published · cited 2× · 278 Or. App. 821; 379 P.3d 796; 2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 728
PER CURIAM In this juvenile dependency case, father appeals a judgment of jurisdiction and disposition, challenging the juvenile court’s requirement that father undergo a psychological evaluation. He argues that the evaluation requirement does not bear a rational relationship to the basis for jurisdiction, to wit: father’s substance abuse interfered with his ability to safely parent his child. If there is no
State v. Jacksonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2018-12-19 · Published · cited 0× · 926 N.W.2d 779
George Jackson appeals his guilty-plea convictions of three crimes and a post-judgment nunc pro tunc order. CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED; NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER VACATED; AND REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF A CORRECTED SENTENCING ORDER. CONVICTIONS AFFIRMED. NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER VACATED. REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF A CORRECTED SENTENCING ORDER.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999-05-10 · Published · cited 24× · 178 F.3d 844; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 8774; 1999 WL 288493
BAUER, Circuit Judge. Defendant George W. Barger raises two issues in this appeal. First, he claims that he should have been sentenced according to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. Second, he claims that the issues raised in his § 2255 motion are not moot. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the district court’s decision to sentence Barger under pre-Guidelines stand
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 2, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00211-CV FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. (N/K/A FLEMING, NOLEN & JEZ, L.L.P.) AND GEORGE FLEMING, Appellants V. DON JACKSON, JEFFREY W. CHAMBERS, AND WARE, CHAMBERS, LEE & CHAMBERS, L.L.P., Appellees
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2015-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
April 2, 2015 JUDGMENT The Fourteenth Court of Appeals FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. (N/K/A FLEMING, NOLEN & JEZ, L.L.P.) AND GEORGE FLEMING, Appellants NO. 14-15-00211-CV V. DON JACKSON, JEFFREY W. CHAMBERS, AND WARE, CHAMBERS, LEE & CHAMBERS, L.L.P., Appellees ___________________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana) · 2017-07-26 · Published · cited 11× · 528 S.W.3d 770
OPINION Opinion by Justice Burgess While walking to her mailbox on July 10, 2014, Amy Bolton was viciously attacked by two dogs owned by her neighbor,■,Mata-ba Kisenda Tucker. After undergoing seven-surgeries as a-result of the attack, Bolton sued Tucker and her landlord, George K. Fisher, and asserted* separate causes of action for
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2015-07-30 · Published · cited 5× · 174 So. 3d 1279; 2015 Miss. LEXIS 380; 2015 WL 4572920
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-01660-SCT ILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD COMPANY d.b.a CANADIAN NATIONAL/ILLINOIS CENTRAL v. LUTHER W. McLAIN DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/13/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. TOMIE T. GREEN COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: CHARLES HENRY RUSSELL, III
Jackson v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2010-04-15 · Published · cited 22× · 314 S.W.3d 118; 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 2730; 2010 WL 1492579
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 120 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 121 OPINION A jury found appellant, Demichael R. Jackson, guilty of engaging in organized
Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016-10-13 · Published · cited 13× · 505 S.W.3d 80; 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 11216; 2016 WL 6024387
OPINION Patrick A. Pirtle, Justice This appeal involves conflicting claims of ownership pertaining to an oil and gas royalty interest and right of reversion, as it pertains to certain real property located in Wheeler County, Texas. Appellant, Jane Fuller Jackson, claims ownership of the property in dispute by virtue of a Mineral Deed Without Warranty dated November 23, 1993, which was recorded te
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999-01-15 · Published · cited 0× · 38 F. Supp. 2d 648; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 494; 1999 WL 33881
38 F.Supp.2d 648 (1999) George W. JACKSON Jr., Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant. No. 98 C 2425. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 15, 1999. *649 Ayesha S. Hakeem, Law Offices of Ayesha S. Hakeem, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Patricia M. Carroll-Smith, Assistant Corporation Counse
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017-08-10 · Published · cited 4× · 866 F.3d 982; 2017 WL 3429837; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 14762
COLLOTON, Circuit Judge. Richard Jackson appeals an order of the district court 2 denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his cellular telephone. The search occurred while Jackson was serving a term of supervised release and residing at the Fort Des Moines Community Correctional Facility. B
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-04-19 · Published · cited 3× · 419 F. App'x 666
ORDER Tyrone Jackson and Madlon Ladd sold crack in Mount Vernon, Illinois. After a jury trial they were convicted of conspiracy and substantive counts of possession and distribution. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). Jackson, who is pro se, appeals his convictions and sentence. Ladd’s lawyer, on the other hand, moves to withdraw on the ground that her appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.C
Supreme Court of Missouri · 2020-06-16 · Published · cited 0×
SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc IN THE INTEREST OF D.E.G., ) Opinion issued June 16, 2020 ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SC97869 ) JUVENILE OFFICER OF