Cases

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., REESE and BROWN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS COURT. AL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED FOR NEW T

ORDER JOHN ANTOON, II, United States District Judge A jury returned a verdict finding that Environmental Manufacturing Solutions, LLC (EMS) infringed a patent owned by Peach State Labs, Inc. (Peach State). Based on that verdict, this Court entered a permanent injunction preventing EMS from further infringing the patent. Peach State also alleged that EMS engaged in litigation misconduct, and the Court,

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0074p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ LYNWOOD PICKENS, individually and for others │ similarly situ

OPINION ROBINSON, Senior District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (the “government”), seeks to enjoin Rockwell Holdco, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Energy Solutions, Inc. (“Energy Solutions”) from acquiring Andrews County Holding, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary Waste Control Specialists LLC (‘WCS,” and collectively with the other defend

Jeffrey Cole, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE *933"Wisdom too often never comes, and so one ought not to reject it merely because it comes late." Henslee v. Union Planters Nat. Bank & Trust Co. ,

REVERSED and REMAND and Opinion Filed December 31, 2020 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-19-00028-CV THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant V. MESQUITE CREEK DEVELOPMENT, INC., A GEORGIA CORPORATION AND RACETRAC PETROLEUM, INC., A GEORGIA CORPORATION,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 Amended August 25, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COU

307 F.Supp.2d 1249 (2004) BENCHMARK MEDICAL HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. REHAB SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.03-A-993-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. March 5, 2004. *1250 *1251 *1252

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on TBO Capital, LLC (“TBO”) and Landmark Financial Solutions, LLC’s (“Landmark”) (together, the “Removing Defendants”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [2]. Also before the Court is Plaintiffs Heather J. Gardner and Cyril M. Gardner’s (together, the “Gardners” or “Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand [5].</

FOURTH DIVISION DILLARD, P. J., BROWN and PADGETT, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules January 29, 2025

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BROWN and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND AMENDED OPINION ORDER In a separate order filed concurrently with this order, we certified a question on Oregon price discrimination law to the Oregon Supreme Court. Accordingly, the opinion filed on September 4, 2007 is AMENDED as follows. First, the last paragraph before section “I,” originally, 502 F.3d at 901:

Grant, Justice. *247We suspect that bench and bar have become accustomed to hearing the familiar recitation from this Court that Georgia's "new" Evidence Code has changed the rules. Although the new Evidence Code became law in January of 2013, meaning that it is not so very new in its application, cases can take some time to make their way to

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-12-00476-CV Christopher J. MCLUCAS, Appellant v. G.E. CAPITAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, G.E. CAPITAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTION

John T. Gregg, United States Bankruptcy Judge Produce Pay, Inc. ("Produce Pay") asserts a claim under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499 et seq. ("PACA") against Spiech Farms, LLC, the debtor-in-possession in this chapter 11 case (the "Debtor"). Produce Pay argues that its PACA claim

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ALEXIS HUNLEY; MATTHEW No. 22-15293 SCOTT BRAUER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly D.C. No. 3:21-cv- Situated, 03778-CRB Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. OPINION INSTAGRAM, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. Appea

303 Ga. 358 FINAL COPY S17G0832. CHRYSLER GROUP, LLC v. WALDEN et al. GRANT, Justice. We suspect that bench and bar have become accustomed to hearing the familiar recitation from this Court that Georgia’s “new” Evidence Code has changed the rules. Although the new Evidence Code became law in January of 2013, meaning that it is not so very new in its application, cases can take some time to make their way to this Court on appeal. Accordingly, we still have work to

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT Charles S. Miller, Jr., Magistrate Judge, United States District Court Plaintiff 'Bakken Residential, LLC (“Bakken”) commenced this action on Oc*817tober 19, 2012, against Cahoon Enterprises, LLC, (“Cahoon”), several weeks after Cahoon declared that it considered a real estate purchase agreem

ORDER HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Data analytics and computer software create efficiencies in many industries, nursing home providers included. That’s why defendant Pruitt Health, Inc., one such provider in the southeast, contracted with Caradigm USA LLC to condense several different electronic medical- records systems into one longitudinal patient summary. After a few months