Cases

*40 Judge STUCKY delivered the opinion of the Court. We granted review of the sole issue Appellant assigned as error, to determine whether Appellant’s guilty pleas to assault consummated by a battery were improvident because evidence indicated he obtain

OPINION *Page 2 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Jimmie D. Carr appeals the November 1, 2007 Judgment Entry entered by the Tuscarawas County Court, Uhrichsville, Ohio, that ordered him to pay restitution for medical expenses and lost wages in the total amount of $497.20. Plaintiff-appellee is the State of Ohio. STATEMENT OF THE CASE

(2008) GERALD CHAMALES CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. OKI DATA AMERICAS, INC. and Barry L. McElreath, Defendants, v. Gerald Chamales Corporation and Gerald Chamales[1], Counterclaim-Defendants. Civil Action No. 07-1947 (JEI). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. June 6, 2008. OPINION IRENAS, Senior District Judge: Prese

120 N.J. 336 (1990) 576 A.2d 872 JOYCE CARR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. H. THOMAS CARR, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. The Supreme Court of New Jersey. Argued March 12, 1990. Decided July 24, 1990. *339 John A. Craner argued the cause for appellant (Craner, Nelson, Satkin & Scheer, attorneys; John

281 S.W.3d 474 (2008) Robert F. DUNCAN, Jr. and InterAmerica Property Company, Appellants, v. F-STAR MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., F-Star Properties, Inc., F-Star Socorro, L.P., Five Star International Holdings Incorporated, Nine Star Investments Incorporated, Gerald C. "Jerry" Ayoub, Five on Site International, Inc. and Penta Estrella S. de R.L. de C.V., Appellees. No. 08-06-00007-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas,

FORT Hood, P.J. In Docket No. 309796, petitioner Loren Pollack appeals as of right an order granting cotrustee Ronald M. Barron’s motion for summary disposition of Loren’s petition to set aside the Gerald L. Pollack Trust (the Trust or the October Trust), entered on March 15, 2012. In Docket No. 310844, Loren and petitioner Leslie Pollack appeal as of right an order

Order JAMES G. CARR, SR., District Judge. The above-referenced cases were part of a multidistrict litigation proceeding consolidated before this Court for pretrial purposes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. These three cases are scheduled for consolidated jury trial proceedings commencing on February 21, 2012. See Trial Order issued November 28, 2011, 02-16012, Doc. 113. The Trial Order required the par

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued December 14, 2023 Decided June 14, 2024 No. 22-3033 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE v. GERALD SMITH, APPELLANT Consolidated with 22-3080 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Colu

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW Appellant, George Christian Carr, was convicted of one count of armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d), and one count of using a firearm in committing a violent crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He received á total sentence of 106 months. The primary issue on appeal is whether, over a defendant’s objection

MAXWELL, Justice, specially concurring: ¶ 68, This case presents a battle of experts and under a typical common-sense approach to expert testimony should be affirmed. The judge weighed both side’s experts, and after doing so, concluded Carr failed in his burden of proof. While this is generally how our courts handle expert testimony, the majority finds the trial judge erred in this process, essentially for

585 F.Supp. 863 (1984) UNITED STATES of America and Carol L. Rusche, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Gerald S. CARR, President of Business and Security Consultants, Inc. Civ. A. Nos. 83-3482, 83-3484, 83-3485 and 83-3486. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. March 22, 1984. *864

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0694 Filed September 13, 2017 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. GERALD EMIL RANKIN, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Gregory D. Brandt (guilty plea) and William A. Price (sentencing), District Associate Judges. Gerald Rankin appeals t

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1288 Doc: 95 Filed: 04/09/2026 Pg: 1 of 32 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1288 O.W., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARIE L. CARR, police officer in her individual and offic

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint for Hostile Work Environment, filed June 9, 2011 (Doc. 53)(“Motion”). The primary issues are: (i) whether Plaintiff Johnathan Gerald has adequately set forth allegations to support his host

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-01481-SCT ANTHONY CARR v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/25/2017 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES E. WEBSTER COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: QUITMAN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION BY: ALEXANDER KASSOFF

785 F.Supp.2d 1074 (2011) Johnathan B. GERALD, Plaintiff, v. Mike LOCKSLEY, Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico, and Paul Krebs, Defendants. No. CIV 10-0721 JB/LFG. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 6, 2011. *1084 Jill M. Collins, Beall & Biehler, Santiago E. Juarez, Albuquerque, NM and Dennis W. M

MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a criminal defendant both .the right to confront and cross-examine the witnesses against him and the right to a fair trial by an impartial jury. In Jerry Deuntay Carr’s trial for capital murder,' we find both -of those rights were protected.

[Cite as Weir Foulds, L.L.P. v. Restivo, 2014-Ohio-1133.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) WEIR FOULDS LLP C.A. No. 13CA010349 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

27 F.Supp.2d 1324 (1998) CARLEY CAPITAL GROUP, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DELOITTE & TOUCHE, L.L.P., Defendant. No. CIV. A. 1:97-CV-3183-TWT. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. November 16, 1998. *1325 *1326 *1327 W. Pitts Carr, R

OPINION CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge. This case is before the court after oral argument on defendant’s dispositive motion. Plaintiffs are current and former Federal Wage System supervisors employed at an Army installation who allege that their employment required them to work in areas where concentrations of asbestos fibers may have exposed them to possible illness or injury. They demand enviro