Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gerald Martin Donahue”
Donahue v. Shughart, Thomson & Kilroy, PCpublic domain
900 S.W.2d 624 (1995) Mary DONAHUE and Sundy McClung, Appellants, v. SHUGHART, THOMSON & KILROY, P.C., et al., Respondents. No. 77714. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. June 20, 1995. *625 Gregg Lombardi, Arthur A. Benson, II, Kansas City, for appellants. Spencer J. Brown, Daniel E. Hamann, Kansas City, for responden
344 F.3d 959 Hotel & Motel Association of Oakland; Balu K. Patel; Usha B. Patel; Navin Patel; Tara N. Patel; Bharat Patel; Niketa Patel, Parsottam B. Patel; Gita Patel; Vinod P. Patel; Madhuben V. Patel; Jagdish Patel; Bharti J. Patel; Ramesh D. Patel; Thakorbhai G. Patel; Manjuben T. Patel; Kirit S. Patel; Ranjan K. Patel; Manubhai L. Patel; Shardaben M. Patel; Pravin Patel; Sima Patel; Natwarbhai Patel; Jagdishkumar B. Patel; Jayeshkumar D. P
490 A.2d 1218 (1985) MAINE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, et al., v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Argued March 15, 1985. Decided April 25, 1985. *1219 Petrucelli, Cohen, Erler & Cox, Gerald F. Petruccelli (orally), Portland, for Bangor Hydro-Electric Co. Pierce, Atwood, Scribner, Allen, Smith
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Petition for Appointment of : Board of Viewers for Purpose of : Closing Township Road 444 and/or : Compensating Wyoming Land : Conservancy, Inc. for the Unlawful : Taking of its Property Situate in : Windham Township, Wyoming : County, Pennsylvania : : Appeal of: Wyoming Land : No. 2025 C.D. 2015 Conservancy, Inc.
483 F.Supp.2d 407 (2007) IN RE MERCK & CO., INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: The Consolidated Securities Action. MDL No. 1658 (SRC), Civil Action Nos. 05-1151 (SRC), 05-2367(SRC). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. April 12, 2007. *408 *409
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP v. Zarembapublic domain
403 B.R. 480 (2009) SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP, Appellant, v. Thomas S. ZAREMBA, Appellee. No. 3:08 CV 1855. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Western Division. March 30, 2009. *481 Gerald R. Kowalski, Sarah K. Skow, Cooper & Walinski, Toledo, OH, Craig D. Singer, John K. Villa, John S. Williams, Katherine Leon
Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Ira M. Haughtpublic domain
PER CURIAM: This lawyer disciplinary proceeding concerning Ira M. Haught (hereinafter “Haught”) is before this Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the Hearing Panel Subcommittee of the West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board. The proceeding arose from a two count Statement of Charges filed by the Investigative Panel. Count I (No. 10-05-226) alleged violations of the
Herbert, J. This is an original action in mandamus commenced by the relator, Board of Trustees of the Police and Firemen’s Pension Fund of the State of Ohio, seeking the allowance of a writ of mandamus to issue out. of this court commanding the respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Relief and Pension Fund of Martins Ferry to transfer to relator board “all assets of the Police Relief and Pension Fund of the Municipal Corpora
United States v. Timmspublic domain
799 F.Supp.2d 582 (2011) UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. Gerald Wayne TIMMS, Respondent. No. 5:08-HC-02156-BO. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. July 1, 2011. *585 Edward D. Gray, G. Norman Acker, III, R.A. Renfer, Jr., U.S. Attorney's Office, Michael James, Joshua B. Royster, U.S. Depa
NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 11/14/2023 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:.42:19 NON- COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr
Hale v. Ward Countypublic domain
McEVERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Robert Hale, individually and on behalf of the State of North Dakota, and Susan Hale appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their public nuisance claim against Ward County and the City of Minot. We conclude the Hales, as private persons, are not entitled to maintain a claim for a public nuisance under N.D.C.C. § 42-01-08, because they did not show the
Spangler v. United Statespublic domain
WEINMAN, District Judge. The sole issue involved in this controversy is whether or not a person engaged in training with a National Guard Unit during the two week active duty for training period provided for in Title 10 U.S.C.A. § 672(b) and Title 32 U.S. C.A. § 502(a) is an employee of the United States Government within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b), the Federal Tort Claims Act.1</
Schwarz v. Gierkepublic domain
CROTHERS, Justice. [¶ 1] Deanne J. Gierke appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to compel arbitration. We reverse and remand to the district court for entry of an order compelling arbitration of the dispute because we conclude the district court erred in holding the relevant arbitration provision does not apply. I
Brown v. Nucor Corp.public domain
576 F.3d 149 (2009) Quinton BROWN; Jason Guy; Ramon Roane; Alvin Simmons; Sheldon Singletary; Gerald White; Jacob Ravenell, individually and on behalf of the class they seek to represent, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NUCOR CORPORATION; Nucor Steel Berkeley, Defendants-Appellees. No. 08-1247. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: January 27, 2009.
STATE OF NY BY ABRAMS v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.public domain
673 F.Supp. 664 (1987) STATE OF NEW YORK by Robert ABRAMS, Attorney General, Plaintiff, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., et al., Defendants. UNIONDALE BEER CO., INC., Plaintiff, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., et al., Defendants. CUMBERLAND FARMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., et al., Defendants. VASILIOW COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC., et al., Defendants. 86 CV 23
Patel v. Crown Diamonds, Inc.public domain
Filed 3/30/16; pub. & mod. order 4/29/16 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE RITA PATEL et al., G051439 Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2014-00713449) v.
United States v. Citizen Publishing Companypublic domain
280 F.Supp. 978 (1968) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. CITIZEN PUBLISHING COMPANY, Star Publishing Company, Tucson Newspapers Incorporated, Arden Publishing Company, and William A. Small, Jr., Defendants. No. Civ-1969. United States District Court D. Arizona. January 31, 1968. *979 Charles D. Mahaffie, Jr., Gerald A. Conn
Sharp v. Crawfordpublic domain
313 S.W.3d 193 (2010) J.P. SHARP and Dorothy J. Sharp, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, v. Joyce CRAWFORD, Valisa Michelle Nelson, and Brian Alexander, Respondents/Cross-Appellants, and Jasper County Commissioners, Respondents. Nos. SD 29859, SD 29870. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. June 8, 2010. *194
Gardley-Starks v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION SHARION AYCOCK, District Judge. In this diversity action, Plaintiff Lirlene Gardley-Starks asserts numerous causes of action under Mississippi law, arguing that her ingestion of the prescription drug metoclopramide caused her to develop a neurological disorder known as tardive dyskinesia. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [81] filed by Defendant Schwarz Pharma
Robie, J. *1134In this declaratory relief action, the trial court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff, The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry (the National Grange), declaring (essentially) that the property that belonged to the California State Grange when the National Grange revoked the California State Grange's cha