Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gerawan Farming Services LLC”
Filed 9/24/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F076148, F076150 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 13CECG03374) v. AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS OPINION B
Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd.public domain
LEVY, J. *1140This case involves the intersection of two of the fundamental purposes of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act ( Labor Code, 1 § 1140 et seq.; the ALRA): one is the policy to provide agricultural workers with the right to choose in questions of labor representation through a secret ballot election process (§§ 1140.2, 1152, 115
Liu, J. *1129 In 1975, the Legislature enacted the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (ALRA) "to encourage and protect the right of agricultural employees to full freedom of association, self-organization, and designation of representatives of their own choosing, to negotiate the terms an
Filed 5/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F073720 Petitioner, (42 ALRB No. 1) v. OPINION AGRICULTURAL LA
Filed 1/14/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CRESCENT CAPITAL HOLDINGS, LLC, ) No. BV 033446 ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) Pasadena Trial Court ) v.
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge, dissenting: It has been more than seven decades since the Supreme Court ended the “mischievous” regime of Swift v. Tyson, 41 U.S. 1, 16 Pet. 1, 10 L.Ed. 865 (1842), in which federal courts sitting in diversity disregarded state court decisions and independently determined the meaning of state law. Erie Railroad, Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 74, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed.
People Ex Rel. Ross v. Raisin Valley Farms LLCpublic domain
Opinion BUTZ, J. We conclude here that while the California Marketing Act of 1937 (the CMA; Food & Agr. Code, § 58601 et seq.) may have its roots in the Great Depression, it also has branches that extend to the contemporary world of agriculture. 1 </
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCpublic domain
CORRIGAN, J., Concurring and Dissenting.—I agree with the majority that Civil Code section 2527 (hereafter section 2527, the statute, or the provision) implicates the right of free speech under article I, section 2, subdivision (a) of our state Constitution (article I), which provides: “Every person may freely speak, write and publish his or her sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the
Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC v. Nickellpublic domain
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET M. MORROW, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE On October 8, 2014, Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC (“Aliya”) filed, this action against Robert P. Nickell, Comprehensive Toxicology Billing, LLC (“CTB”), Exec Billing Services, LLC (“Exec Billing”) (collectively “defendants”), and various fictitious defendants.1
Vanguard Outdoor, LLC v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
648 F.3d 737 (2011) VANGUARD OUTDOOR, LLC, a California limited liability company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a California municipal corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 10-56635. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 2, 2011. Filed June 3, 2011. Benjamin P. Pugh, (argued) and James S. Azadian, Ent
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCpublic domain
ORDER Appellants’ request to modify the counsel listing in the Appendix to the Court’s June 6, 2012 Order is GRANTED. The order filed June 6, 2012 is amended by deleting the current Appendix and adding a new Appendix as follows: APPENDIX Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees Michael A. Bowse
Shear Development Co., LLC v. Cal. Coastal Com.public domain
Filed 5/13/26 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA SHEAR DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION, Defendant and Respondent. S284378 Second Appellate District, Division Six B319895 San Luis Obispo County Superior Court
Burnett v. Chimney Sweep, LLCpublic domain
20 Cal.Rptr.3d 562 (2004) 123 Cal.App.4th 1057 George BURNETT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CHIMNEY SWEEP et al., Defendants and Respondents. 2d Civil No. B167190. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six. November 2, 2004. *565 Dennis Neil Jones, Esq., Ventura; Myers, Widders, Gibson, Jones
Beeman v. ANTHEM PRESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT, LLCpublic domain
652 F.3d 1085 (2011) JERRY BEEMAN AND PHARMACY SERVICES, INC., doing business as Beemans Pharmacy; Anthony Hutchinson and Rocida Inc., doing business as Finleys Rexall Drug; Charles Miller, doing business as Yucaipai Valley Pharmacy; Jim Morisoli and American Surgical Pharmacy Inc., doing business as American Surgical Pharmacy; Bill Pearson and Pearson and House, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general publi
Fowler Packing Company, Inc. v. David Lanierpublic domain
OPINION GOULD, Circuit Judge: In response to recent state appellate court decisions that exposed employers to significant and unexpected minimum wage liability, California passed Assembly Bill 1513 (AB 1513). This law created a “safe harbor” that gave employers an affirmative defense against the new claims so long as the employer made back payments under
Opinion MORENO, J. We granted the request of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to decide whether, under California law, a shopping mall may enforce a rule prohibiting persons from *855urging customers to boycott a store in the mall. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the right to free speech granted by artic
Filed 9/23/25 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF C100351 CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2022-
Suarez v. Trigg Laboratories, Inc.public domain
Opinion EPSTEIN, P. J.— Rafael V. Suarez challenges the grant of Trigg Laboratories, Inc.’s special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute. 1 We affirm the order. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY
Sepanossian v. Nat. Ready Mix Co.public domain
Filed 11/15/23 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN GARY SEPANOSSIAN, B319260 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV13996) v. NATIONAL READY MIX COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of
Silva v. Medic Ambulance Service, Inc.public domain
Filed 4/4/24 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE MEGHAN SILVA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A167098 v. (Solano County MEDIC AMBULANCE SERVICE, Super. Ct. No. FCS048440) INC., Defendant and Respondent. Plaintiff Meghan Sil