Cases

DECISION AND ORDER HON. MICHAEL A. TELESCA, United States District Judge I. Introduction Represented by counsel, Matthew James Gibbs (“plaintiff’) brings this action pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”), seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”

Case below, 529 Fed.Appx. 950.Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.

*937MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Jay Alan Rollefson seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the Commissioner) denying his application for Social Security Disability benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSI) under Title II and Tit

ORDER SCULLIN, Senior District Judge. In October 2006, Plaintiff applied for disability and disability insurance benefits under the Social Security Act. Plaintiff alleged that he had been unable to work since September 2006 due to various physical impairments. Defendant initially denied Plaintiffs application, and Plaintiff requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”). ALJ Elizabeth Koenn

[Cite as Colvin v. Ctr. for Dev. & Property Solutions, 2021-Ohio-4392.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Jeffrey A. Colvin, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 20AP-535 v. : (C.P.C. No. 20CV-4044)

W.H. Gibbs, hereinafter called plaintiff, has appealed from a judgment of the superior court of Pima county, in favor of Ethel Pryor Basham, individually and as executrix of the estate of John Colvin Basham, deceased, also known as J.C. Basham, hereinafter called defendant. There are three assignments of error, which read as follows: "1. The court erred in entering a judgment not supported by the pleadings. "2. The court erred in admitting evidence for the purpose of show

Broyles, C. J. Where it is sought to bring to. this court the evidence introduced upon a trial, without incorporating the evidence in the bill of exceptions, and the bill of exceptions recites that a number of witnesses “testified in behalf of the plaintiff in error, as is shown by a brief of *92tlie evidence as approved by the court and made a part of the record,” and fur

Stephens, J. 1. Where it was sought to recover of physicians damages alleged to have resulted from their unskilled performance of a surgical operation upon the plaintiff, allegations in the plaintiff’s petition that by the operation the defendants removed certain organs from the body of the plaintiff, and “did with knives, scissors, clips, needles, and other surgical instruments and appliances, in performing the operation upon t

369 F.Supp. 38 (1973) Harry H. and Thelma GIBBS et al. v. William A. TITELMAN, Individually and as Director of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al. Civ. A. No. 72-2165. United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania. November 8, 1973. *39 *40

Patterson, J. The parties in this court stand in the same relation as they did in the court below. The plaintiff in her petition alleges that William H. Gibbs was her son, and that on the 13th day of July, 1917, he became a member of the defendant order, in good standing, and that the defendant *440issued to him its certain certificate or policy of in

Thomsoh, P. J. Ejectment by appellant to recover the possession of a lode the top or apex of which, as it alleged, lay . within the exterior boundary lines of its "Washington lode mining claim, and from which it complained that it had been- ousted by the appellees through' underground workings from an adjoining claim. The defendants were the owners of the Cook lode mining claim through a patent older than that under which the

Thomsoh, P. J. Ejectment by appellant to recover the possession of a lode the top or apex of which, as it alleged, lay . within the exterior boundary lines of its "Washington lode mining claim, and from which it complained that it had been- ousted by the appellees through' underground workings from an adjoining claim. The defendants were the owners of the Cook lode mining claim through a patent older than that under which the

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER RE: ATTORNEY’S FEES & COSTS BRUCE S. JENKINS, Senior District Judge. The plaintiff TruGreen Companies, L.L.C. (“TruGreen”) commenced the above-captioned action on February 8, 2006, alleging a number of claims against the defendants, including a number of former TruGreen employees, for breach of employment contracts, tortious interference with contract and with economi

HARVEY M. PERT, TRANSFEREE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent KATHLEEN M. PERT, F.K.A. KATHLEEN M. RIFFE, TRANSFEREE, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentPert v. CommissionerDocket Nos. 13783-94, 13784-94.

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Cour

321 Ga. 830 FINAL COPY S25A0661. LEWIS v. THE STATE. MCMILLIAN, Justice. Appellant Latif Arthur Lewis was convicted of malice murder and other charges in connection with the shooting death of Randy Killens, Jr.1 On appeal, Lewis contends that the evidence was not 1 Killens died on April 5, 2018. On May 23, 2018, a Ware County grand jury indicted Lewis for aggravated assault (Count 1), felony murder (Count 2), malice murder (Count 3), possession of a

761 P.2d 212 (1988) The CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, a Home Rule City and a Colorado Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard BLANCHE and Faith Bible Fellowship International, a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 87SA150. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. September 12, 1988. *214 James G. Colvi

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DARRYL THOMAS et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 21-3242 (TJK) BANK OF AMERICA et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Darryl Thomas sued Defendants—a group of banks and loan servicers—in the District of Columbia Superior Court on behalf of himself

300 F.3d 1361 Joseph C. CAMPA, Wayne S. Airmet, Mario P. Alfonsi, Randolph P. Allen, Steven R. Allison, James P. Anderson, Michael L. Anderson, John M. Archield, Johnny D. Ayo, Richard D. Ballas, Donald G. Baker, Robert L. Baltzer, Robert E. Barb, Michael K. Barber, Marya M. Bard, William D. Barker, Richard C. Beaman, Lee R. Beard, David W. Bearden, Lisa Mara Bell, Robert D. Bell, Scott W. Beyer, Michael G. Birdsong, Ricky A. Blakely, Betty Borders