Cases

758 F.Supp.2d 638 (2010) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: All Cases. Cause Nos. 3:05-MD-527 RM, MDL-1700. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division. December 13, 2010. *653 OPINION and ORDER ROBERT L. MILLER, JR., Distri

662 F.Supp.2d 1069 (2009) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: 3:05-CV-596 (Slayman—Oregon) 3:07cv120 (Nevada) 3:07cv272 (Arizona) 3:07cv322 (Connecticut) 3:07cv324 (Givens—FLSA) 3:07cv325 (Vargas—MCSA) 3:07cv326 (North Carolina) 3:07cv328 (Leighter—Oregon) 3:08cv336 (Ohio) 3:07cv411 (Georgia) 3:07cv412 (Vermont) 3:07cv478 (Colorado) 3:08cv193 (Boudreaux—Louisiana) 3:08c

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE; ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; and ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT JON P. McCALLA, District Judge. Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 23-3202 COINBASE, INC., Petitioner v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION On Petition for Review of Securities and Exchange Commission Order (No. 4-789) _____________________________ Argued on Septem

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW CAMPBELL; MICHAEL No. 17-16873 HURLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:13-cv-05996- PJH v. FACEBOOK, INC., OPINION Defendant-Appellee, v. ANNA W. ST. JOHN,

NOEL L. HILLMAN, U.S.D.J. *1027This matter arises from a Distribution Agreement between Plaintiff Lawmen Supply Company of New Jersey, Inc. and Defendant Glock, Inc. Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant in part and deny in part Defendant's motion. The Court will grant Plaintiff

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge Raef Lawson worked as a restaurant delivery driver for Grubhub in Southern California for four months in late 2015 and early 2016. He complains that Grubhub improperly classified him as an independent contractor rather than an employee under California law and in doing so violated California's minimum wage, overtime and employee expense reimbursement laws. He brings his claims

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AMY J. ST. EVE, District Court Judge: Defendants Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”) and Comcast Spotlight, LP (“Comcast Spotlight”)1 have moved to dismiss Plaintiff Viamedia, Inc.’s (“Viamedia”) complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (R. 22.) For the following reasons, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ motion

OPINION AND ORDER GERSHON, District Judge: Plaintiff Ashley Peralta brings this discrimination action against her former employer Roros 940, Inc. (“Roros Inc.”) and its principal John P. Roros (“Roros”). She claims that, because of her gender and pregnancy, she was subjected to a hostile work environment and then terminated in violation of Title VII and the New York City Human Rights Law (“NYCH

17-1993-cv (L) New York v. United Parcel Service, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2018 Argued: March 8, 2019 Decided: November 7, 2019 Docket Nos. 17-1993-cv; 17-2107-cv; 17-2111-cv THE STATE OF NEW YORK, THE CITY OF NEW YORK,

MEMORANDUM STENGEL, District Judge. The plaintiff filed this action seeking a declaration that the Prevent All Cigarette *311Trafficking Act of 2009 (“the Act”) is unconstitutional. After a hearing, I denied the plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction which sought to enjoin and restrain the enforcement of the Act pending final deter

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge. The plaintiffs, Timothy Heeg and Kristin Semon, have moved for conditional class certification and for issuance of notice to potential opt-in class members. (Docket Entry No. 20). The plaintiffs’ proposed class includes “all hourly workers that Adams Harris paid at ‘straight time’ rates for hours worked in excess of forty in a workweek in the past 3 y

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced case, seeking compensatory and punitive damages and equitable relief for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12102 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., is a mot

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE In response to the above referenced main case, which alleges “corporate hijacking” and seeks damages and declaratory relief, Third Party Plaintiffs Frank Fisher,1 Robert Sonfield,2 and the Livingston *837Growth Fund Trust (“Livin

OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced products liability case, removed from state court and alleging strict products liability, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty, gross negligence, and negligence relating to Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.’s (“Bayer’s”) contraceptive drug-releasing intrauterine system

OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court in the above referenced cause, removed from the 112th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas on diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a),1 1441, and 1446, and *532seeking damages

Zloop, Inc. v. Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, LLP, 2018 NCBC 16. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION COUNTY OF MECKLENBURG 17 CVS 5480 ZLOOP, INC., Plaintiff, v. ORDER & OPINION ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN,

327 S.W.3d 7 (2010) Emily WEST and William Grant, Appellants, v. SHARP BONDING AGENCY, INC., Seneca Insurance Company, Inc., and Bail USA, Inc., Respondents. Nos. WD 71651, WD 72434. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. November 2, 2010. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied December 21, 2010.

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION.'.327 II. FACTS & PROCEDURAL HISTORY.328 A. Trinity Objects to Wal-Mart’s Sale of Assault Rifles.328 B. Trinity’s Shareholder Proposal.329 C. Wal-Mart Seeks a No-Action Letter from the SEC.330 D. Trinity Takes its Fight to F

*827OPINION AND ORDER MELINDA HARMON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The above referenced securities-fraud, putative class action alleges material misrepresentations and omissions by Defendants regarding Key Energy Services, Inc.’s (“Key’s”) financial condition and the future of its business, leading to inflated stock prices in violation of §§ 10(b), co