Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
14 opinions for “Gillman v. Sweat”
Hassett v. Hasselbeckpublic domain
757 F.Supp.2d 73 (2010) Susan HASSETT, Plaintiff, v. Elisabeth HASSELBECK, et al., Defendants. C.A. No. 09-12034-MLW. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. December 3, 2010. *77 Susan Hassett, East Falmouth, MA, pro se. Laura O'Boyle, Orin Snyder, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, New York, NY, Robert L. Ullmann,
ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenbergpublic domain
908 F.Supp. 640 (1996) ProCD, INC., Plaintiff, v. Matthew ZEIDENBERG, and Silken Mountain Web Services, Defendants. No. 95-C-0671-C. United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin. January 4, 1996. *641 *642 *643 Michael J. Lawton, Lathrop & Clark, Madiso
Galiano v. Harrah's Operating Co.public domain
*413 JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: Gianna, Inc. (“Gianna”), sued Harrah’s Entertainment, Inc. (“Harrah’s”), for copyright infringement. The district court granted Harrah’s’ motion for summary judgment on the infringement claim and denied Gianna’s motion for summary judgment on Harrah’s’ fraud on the Copyrig
Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.public domain
DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 80 (concurring). In our society, sexual abuse of a child ranks among the most heinous crimes a person can commit. Accord Doe v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 211 Wis. 2d 312, 355, 565 N.W.2d 94 (1997). Charlotte Dawn (Charlotte) openly and repeatedly leveled allegations of child sexual abuse against her father, Dr. Charles Johnson, gravely damaging his personal and professional reputations. She made
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION SCOTT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties’ Motions and Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Corporation’s (“BAPCO”) amended complaint against Defendant/Counterclaimant Donnelley Information Publishing, Inc. (“Donnelley”) alleges copyright infringement, tradem
Kraus v. Consolidated Rail Corp.public domain
723 F.Supp. 1073 (1989) William KRAUS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION. Ronald SHOEMAKER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION. Wayne OWENS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION. Charles BARBER v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION. Civ. A. Nos. 87-5905, 88-2509, 88-5101 and 88-5878. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. August 28, 1989.
Shabazz v. Barnauskaspublic domain
600 F.Supp. 712 (1985) Abdul Hakim Jamal Nasir SHABAZZ, a/k/a Owen X. Denson, Plaintiff, v. K.C. BARNAUSKAS, D.S. Gladis, C.W. Blivens, D.H. Brierton, Defendants. Abdul Hakim Jamal Nasir SHABAZZ, a/k/a Owen X. Denson, Plaintiff, v. R.G. WILLIAMS, F.I. Cowart, Defendants. Nos. 79-1-Civ-J-B, 79-38-Civ-J-B. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division.
In re National Heritage Foundation, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BRIAN F. KENNEY, Bankruptcy Judge. On remand from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, this Court is called upon to set forth specific findings of fact — if the *219record so permits — in support of the Release, Exculpation and Injunction Provisions set forth in the Debtor’s Fourth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization. The
BellSouth Adv. & Pub. v. Donnelley Inf. Pub.public domain
719 F.Supp. 1551 (1988) BELLSOUTH ADVERTISING & PUBLISHING CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant, v. DONNELLEY INFORMATION PUBLISHING, INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant, v. BELLSOUTH CORPORATION and Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company, Additional Counterdefendants. No. 85-3233-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 27, 1988. <
James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail Corporationpublic domain
*358OPINION OF THE COURT NYGAARD, Circuit Judge. James E. Gottshall appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Consolidated Rail Corporation in this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. In the context of the facts that follow, we will examine whether FELA recognizes negligent infliction of emotional distres
Inquiry Concerning Daveypublic domain
645 So.2d 398 (1994) Inquiry Concerning A Judge No. 93-62, re: P. Kevin DAVEY. No. 82328. Supreme Court of Florida. October 13, 1994. Rehearing Denied December 2, 1994. *399 Joseph J. Reiter, Chairman and Ford L. Thompson, General Counsel, Tallahassee, and Charles P. Pillans, III of Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault & Pillans
Opinion by Simpson, C.: This is an original proceeding in mandamus, instituted by the Hutchinson & Southern Railroad Company, to compel the board of county commissioners and county clerk of Kingman county to issue the bonds of Rich-land township, in Kingman county, in the sum of $13,000, to the plaintiff. These bonds were voted by Richland township on the 27th day of November, 1889, to the Omaha,