Cases

OPINION Justice Robinson, for the Court. These consolidated cases come before the Supreme Court on an, appeal and on a petition, for the issuance of a writ of certio-rari to review a November 5, 2015 bench decision in Providence County Superior Court in favor of the plaintiff, John R. Grasso.1 The defendants, Gina R

ORDER Paul Baisier, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant-Debtor (the “Debtor”) for Summary Judgment filed on August 15, 2016 (Docket No. 8) (the “Motion”) with regard to the Complaint (Docket No. 1) of Plaintiffs named above (the “Plaintiffs”). The Debtor’s Answer is also set forth in this pleading.1 In the Motion, the Debtor seeks a dismissal o

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Beales and AtLee Argued at Richmond, Virginia PUBLISHED TYRONE JACOBS OPINION BY v. Record No. 0906-19-2 JUDGE RICHARD Y. ATLEE, JR. FEBRUARY 18, 20

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued November 16, 2020 Decided January 15, 2021 No. 19-5328 BILAL ABDUL KAREEM, APPELLANT v. GINA CHERI HASPEL, DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District

MOYLAN, Judge. The appellee, Darryl Avery Robinson, was initially convicted on November 25, 1988 and sentenced on February 3, 1989 for various crimes, including assault with intent to maim. Following a convoluted series of proceedings, the details of which need not concern us, his case was remanded for resentencing. For present purposes, the critical resentencing occurred on May 10, 1990, at which time the appellee received a

POSNER, Chief Judge. The appeal in this Title VII case presents questions of class action procedure. 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq.; Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. The suit was filed by Charles Robinson on behalf of those blacks (387 in all) who, although certified as eligible for appointment as Cook County correctional officers between roughly 1991 and 1995, had not been appointed when this suit was filed in 1995. The basis of the

OPINION QUIST, District Judge. This Court has addressed several issues in the distribution of a wrongful death settlement amount in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, with appended state tort and constitutional claims, brought on behalf of Norris Maben, deceased. Still pending before the Court is the issue of whether Norris Maben Jr., who was born after Norris Maben was killed, is the son of the dec

Kekec v Robinson (2018 NY Slip Op 01518) Kekec v Robinson 2018 NY Slip Op 01518 Decided on March 8, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

WORKMAN, Justice: This case is before the Court upon a certified question presented by the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia regarding whether a “deliberate intent” cause of action pursuant to West Virginia Code § 23 — 4—2(d)(2)(h) (2005) may be brought against a non-employer “person,” such as a supervisor or co-employee. Upon careful review

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GINA FIORE; KEITH GIPSON,  No. 08-17558 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:07-cv-01674- ANTHONY WALDEN; UNKNOWN  ECR-LRL AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL ORDER AND GOVERNMENT, AMENDED Defendants-Appellees.  OPINI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2014 Term FILED _____________ May 8, 2014 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 13-0713 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPE

NUMBER 13-20-00500-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG JOE ERNEST ROBINSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas. NUMBER 13-20-00526-CR

ACCEPTED 03-15-00153-CR 7001534 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

PD-0974-15 PD-0974-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 7/28/2015 5:49:16 PM Accepted 7/29/2015 11:43:56 AM

211 S.W.3d 63 (2006) Eugenia Sue Wynn ROBINSON, Appellant, v. Robert Dale ROBINSON, Appellee. No. 2006-CA-001095-ME. Court of Appeals of Kentucky. December 1, 2006. Scott M. Webster, London, KY, for appellant. No Brief for Appellee. Before ACREE, BARBER, and TAYLOR, Judges. OPINION ACREE, Judge. When the Rockcastle

DAVIS, Judge. In these consolidated appeals, William Hammesfahr, the Former Husband, challenges the following orders of the trial court: the order denying his petition for a downward modification of the alimony and child support obligations he owes to Gina Hammesfahr, the Former Wife; the order finding him in contempt for failure to pay his support obligations; and the order granting the Former Wife’s attorney’s fees.

OPINION Chief Justice Suttell, for the Court. The Rhode Island Council on Postsec-ondary Education 1 and the University of Rhode Island (collectively URI) appeal from a Superior Court judgment denying their motio

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 781 CA 11-00264 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, FAHEY, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. GINA M. CHIAPPONE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NATURAL GUARDIAN AND GUARDIAN OF THE PROPERTY OF BRITTNEY A. CHIAPPONE, VINCENT M. CHIAPPONE, GIOVANNI J. CHIAPPONE, MARIANA M. CHIAPPONE AND MICHAEL T. CHIAPPONE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND