Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Ginsberg v. Google Inc.”
Knapp v. Ginsbergpublic domain
Filed 8/5/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR BROOKE KNAPP, B307559 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 19STCV11400) v. LARRY GINSBERG et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Super
Viacom International, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.public domain
676 F.3d 19 (2012) VIACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC., Comedy Partners, Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Black Entertainment Television, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. YOUTUBE, INC., YouTube, LLC, Google, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. The Football Association Premier League Limited, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Bourne Co., Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc.,
Cardsoft, LLC v. Verifone, Inc.public domain
HUGHES, Circuit Judge. CardSoft alleges that Appellants infringe two patents directed to software for small, specialized computers, like payment terminals. In construing the patent *1116 claims, the district court adopted Card-Soft’s proposed construction for the claim term “virtual machine.” App
People Ex Rel. Harris v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.public domain
*888 Opinion JENKINS, J. In this appeal we hold that this lawsuit filed by the People, on behalf of the State of California (the State), under the unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.; UCL), 1 agains
HUGHES, Circuit Judge. The case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court. In CardSoft v. VeriFone, Inc., 769 F.3d 1114 (Fed.Cir.2014), we decided an appeal by defendant-appellants (collectively, VeriFone) from a decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. In construing the patent claims, the district court adopted pla
ACCEPTED 05-13-01503-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/13/2015 3:31:15 PM
Insight Systems Corp., and Centerscope Technologies, Inc. v. the United States 12-863c andpublic domain
Pre-award bid protest; Cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record; Standard of review — Bannum; Proposals received by government mail server, but not forwarded to the next server in the government mail system, were covered by the Government Control exception to the “late is late” rule found in 48 C.F.R. § 52.212-l(f)(2)(i)(B); Plain meaning of regulation controls; Watter
ACCEPTED 01-15-00126-CV
American Library Ass'n, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
201 F.Supp.2d 401 (2002) AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., v. UNITED STATES, et al. Multnomah County Public Library, et al., v. United States of America, et al. Nos. CIV.A. 01-1303, CIV.A. 01-1322. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. May 31, 2002. *402 *403 <
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-23-01067-CV IN RE MESILLA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION and Robert Stowbridge Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
RXD Media, LLC v. IP Application Development LLCpublic domain
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1461 RXD MEDIA, LLC, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. IP APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT LLC; APPLE, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Senior District Jud
State v. Wattspublic domain
2021 UT 60 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. JOSEPH ANDREW WATTS, Appellant. No. 20180976 Heard November 17, 2020 Filed September 28, 2021 On Direct Appeal
Broidy Capital Management LLC v. Muzinpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BROIDY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC et al., Plaintiffs, No. 19-cv-150 (DLF) v. NICOLAS D. MUZIN et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Broidy Capital Management, LLC, and Elliott Broidy (together, “Broidy”) brought this suit
Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.public domain
659 F.3d 1142 (2011) ROBERT BOSCH LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PYLON MANUFACTURING CORP., Defendant-Appellee. No. 2011-1096. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. October 13, 2011. *1144 Mark A. Hannemann, Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, of New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Michael J. Le
Levitt v. Southwest Airlines Co.public domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. These appeals present several issues concerning class action litigation and settlements. The most general is whether the “coupon settlement” provisions of the Class Action Fairness Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1712, allowed the district court to award class counsel an attorney fee based on the lodestar method rather than the value of the redeemed coupons. Our answer to that question is yes. In A
Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.public domain
THOMAS, Chief Judge: These consolidated appeals are the latest round of a long-running dispute over *812salmon and steelhead species listed under the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 - 1544. Three fede
State of Texas v. DHSpublic domain
Case: 23-50869 Document: 181-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit FILED No. 23-50869 November 27, 2024 ____________
Vardanyan v. Amco Ins. Co.public domain
Filed 12/11/15; part. pub. order 1/7/16 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ARTYUN VARDANYAN, F069953 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 11CECG02112) v. AMCO INSURANCE COMPANY,
B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: The Columbia River stretches more than 1,200 miles from its headwaters in Canada to the Pacific Ocean. It drains an enormous swath of the northwestern United States (258,000 square miles). This great *1146river empties more water into the Pacific Ocean than any other river in North or South America. Description
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT G.B., a minor, by and through her No. 25-2473 Guardian, G.P.; M.W., a minor, by and D.C. No. through her Guardian R.W.; M.A., a 2:23-cv-10345- minor, by and through her Guardian MWF-AGR M.T.; Z.M., a minor, by and through his Guardian S.W.; M.M., a mino