⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

14 opinions for “Glenda I. Velez”

Supreme Court of Florida · 2017-08-31 · Published · cited 30× · 224 So. 3d 740; 42 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 773; 2017 Fla. LEXIS 1759; 2017 WL 3774702
LABARGA, C.J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Fourth District *743Court of Appeal in Smith v. Smith, 199 So.3d 911 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). The district court certified the following question to be of great public importance: WHERE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRY HAS NOT BEEN REMOVED FROM A WARD UNDER SECTIO
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-05-15 · Published · cited 14× · 566 F.3d 41; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 10292; 2009 WL 1351125
LYNCH, Chief Judge. In a crime apparently motivated by jealousy over a woman, the woman’s suitor, Kelvin Ramos, was taken from his motorcycle in a Puerto Rican housing project, forced into a van by a group of assailants, including defendant, and murdered by the father of her children. The murderer was killed, perhaps by Ramos’s friends, before any federal charges were brought. </
District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2005-10-24 · Published · cited 11× · 399 F. Supp. 2d 57; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28223; 2005 WL 3030332
399 F.Supp.2d 57 (2005) FREIGHTLINER, L.L.C., Plaintiff(s) v. PUERTO RICO TRUCK SALES, INC., et al., Defendant(s) No. CIV. 04-1950(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 24, 2005. *58 *59 Richard M. Graffam-Rodriguez, Esq., Roberto Abesada-Aguet, Esq., Thomas J.Code-Osorio
State v. Greenepublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013-11-06 · Published · cited 2× · 126 So. 3d 839; 12 La.App. 3 Cir. 649; 2013 WL 5926194; 2013 La. App. LEXIS 2277
GENOVESE, Judge. fin this criminal case, Defendant, Jam-micka Greene, appeals her aggravated battery conviction and sentence, alleging insufficiency of the evidence, erroneous jury instructions, excessive sentence, and ineffective assistance of counsel. For the following reasons, we affirm Defendant’s conviction, vacate her sentence, and remand the matter to the trial court for resentenc-ing. FACTS AND PR
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-1962 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. ANGEL A. MELENDEZ-RIVAS, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO [Hon. José A. Fusté, U.S. District Judge]
District Court, E.D. New York · 2006-12-06 · Published · cited 40× · 465 F. Supp. 2d 176; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88265; 2006 WL 3513123
465 F.Supp.2d 176 (2006) Walter HENNEBERGER, Walter Lipinsky, Glenda Smith, Thomas Tilley, and Douglas Wipperman, Plaintiffs, v. The COUNTY OF NASSAU, Thomas R. Suozzi, David S. Greene, Defendants. No. 05-CV-3242 (JFB)(ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. December 6, 2006. *182 Steven A. Morelli and William Matthew
District Court, S.D. New York · 1994-08-30 · Published · cited 18× · 861 F. Supp. 282; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12096; 1994 WL 469111
861 F.Supp. 282 (1994) NEW ALLIANCE PARTY, Lenora A. Fulani and Rafael Mendez, Plaintiffs, v. NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, Libertarian Party, Democratic Party, Republican Party, Conservative Party, Right to Life Party, and Liberal Party, Defendants. No. 90 Civ. 6226 (RJW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 30, 1994.
Strauss v. Hortonpublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2009-06-17 · Published · cited 65× · 46 Cal. 4th 364
WERDEGAR, J., Concurring. I agree with the majority that Proposition 8 (Gen. Elec. (Nov. 4, 2008)) is a valid amendment to the California Constitution rather than a procedurally defective revision.1 I reject, however, much of the majority’s analysis. The majority purports to find in this court’s prior decisions a definition of the term “revision”—one
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2014-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-14-01021-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 14-14-01021-CV 12/29/2014 10:03:31 PM
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams