Cases

Glenn E. Kelley Attorney for NWACC 303 West Walnut Rogers, Arkansas 72756 Dear Mr. Kelley: You have requested my opinion regarding the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA"). The basis for your request is A.C.A. § 25-19-105(c)(3)(B)(i) (Supp. 2009), which authorizes the custodian, requester, or the subject of personnel, employee evaluation, or job performance records to seek an opinion from this office stating whether the cust

John F. Stroud, Jr., Judge. This is a prescriptive easement case in which appellants, Eugene and Joye Kelley, claim a prescriptive right of passage over property belonging to appellees, William F. Westover, William E. Westover, and Patricia M. Westover. The chancellor determined that appellants had sporadically crossed appellees’ property for more than twenty years, but that their use of the property was not

DOUG MARTIN, Judge. | Appellant D.L.R. appeals from the February 25, 2011 decree of adoption, entered by the Mississippi County Circuit Court, that granted the petition for adoption filed by the appellees, N.K. and C.K., whereby appellees adopted a baby girl born to D.L.R. and his then-wife, T.W.1 On appeal, D.L.R. contends that the circuit court erred in findi

210 Ga. App. 686 (1993) 436 S.E.2d 760 O'KELLEY v. THE STATE. A93A2285. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 14, 1993. Reconsideration Denied October 28, 1993. Glenn Zell, Rodney Zell, for appellant. Keith C. Martin, Solicitor, Evelyn Proctor, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee. JOHNSON, Jud

915 F.2d 386 Christopher A. LaNAVE, Appellant,v.MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT, Peter S. Popovich, Glenn E. Kelley,Rosalie E. Wahl, M. Jeanne Coyne, Lawrence R. Yetka, John H.Simonett, Alexander M. Keith, all in their officialcapacities, Minnesota Board of Law Examiners, Richard H.Kyle, Margaret Fuller Corneille, Carl Baer, Catherine M.Warrick, Frank B. Wilderson, Isabel Gomez, Mary P. Walbran,Joseph P. Cade, John D. Kelly,

Matter of Tierney v Kelley (2022 NY Slip Op 05169) Matter of Tierney v Kelley 2022 NY Slip Op 05169 Decided on September 14, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

A Superior Court judge concluded that the defendant, William R. Kelley, Jr., testified untruthfully at his deposition, and the judge therefore allowed the plaintiffs' motion for contempt. Concluding that the defendant's statements made under oath during a postjudgment deposition supported the finding of contempt, we affirm. Background. The plaintiffs, the two daughters of the defendant, filed an action against him in 2010 alleging th

Matter of Tierney v Kelley (2022 NY Slip Op 05168) Matter of Tierney v Kelley 2022 NY Slip Op 05168 Decided on September 14, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER NEWBLATT, District Judge. Pending before the Court is the Motion of the United States and the State of Michigan to hold Monitor Sugar Company (“Monitor” or “the Company”) in civil contempt and to assess stipulated penalties for a determination of the appropriate damages award for Monitor Sugar’s failure to abide by the terms of the 1987 consent decree (signed by the Court on D

KEITH, Circuit Judge. Appellant, Glenn Charles, appeals from a decision denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Charles was convicted by a jury on October 9, 1972 of the first degree murder of Theodore Ziefle. He is currently serving a life sentence on this charge at the state prison in Jackson,

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Rita Joyce Glenn, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Thomas Harold Glenn, deceased, Respondent, v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.; Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Individually and as Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Pumps; Airgas USA, LLC; Aurora Pump; BW/IP Inc., a Subsidiary of Flowserve Corporation; CBS Corporation, a Delaware Corporation f/k/a Viacom, Inc., Success

353 S.W.3d 364 (2011) Karen BROOKS, Appellant, v. James E. O'KELLEY, et al., Respondent. No. ED 95982. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five. October 18, 2011. Rehearing Denied December 5, 2011. Brendan D. Roediger, Saint Louis University Law Clinic, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. James E. O'Kelley, St. Louis, MO, Responde

HART, J., dissenting. The principal issue in this case is very simply whether the trial court erred in finding that X.T.’s consent to the adoption was not required because he failed to prove “a significant custodial, personal, or financial relationship existed with the minor before the petition for adoption [was] filed.” Ark.Code Ann. § 9-9-206(a)(2) (Repl.2009). I submit that

[Cite as O'Kelley v. Rothenbuhler, 2021-Ohio-1167.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT MONROE COUNTY DR. ROBERT LEON O’KELLEY, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RONALD ROTHENBUHLER ET AL., Defendants-Appellees

78 So.3d 675 (2012) Rico GLENN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 5D10-1006. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. January 27, 2012. *676 James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahasse

Nora Barry Fischer, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court are the respective Motions to Dismiss filed by Allegheny County Port Authority, Allegheny County Port Authority Police Department, Brian O'Malley, Matthew Porter, and Dominic Rivotti, (Docket No. 10 (hereinafter "Port Authority Motion") ), and County of Allegheny, (Docket No. 13 (hereinafter "Allegheny County

774 F.Supp. 1514 (1991) RITE-HITE CORP., Acme Dock Specialists, Inc., Allied Equipment Corp., Applied Handling, Inc., Anderson Material Handling Co., Block-Dickson, HMH Co., HOJ Engineering & Sales Co., Johnson Equipment Co., Johnl & Associates, Inc., Keller Equipment Co., Inc., Loading Dock Equipment, Metro Dock Specialists, McCormick Equipment Co., Mid-South Dock Systems, Monohan Equipment Co., Niehaus Industrial Sales, Inc., Northway Material

07/25/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 16, 2018 RICHARD KELLEY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 41201018 Jill Bartee Ayers, Judge ___________________________________

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0079p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ GLENN WHITING, │ Plaintiff-Appellant,

[Cite as State v. Glenn, 2012-Ohio-3190.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : : Plaintiff-Appellee, : Case Nos. 11CA931 and : 11CA932 vs. : Released: June 29, 2012 : JAMES GLENN, : DECISION AN