Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gloria Jean King”
Jean-Charles v. Perlitzpublic domain
RULING AND ORDER ROBERT N. CHATIGNY, District Judge. I. Plaintiffs bring these consolidated actions to recover damages for sexual abuse they suffered while participating in Project Pierre Toussaint (“PPT”), a residential school for poor children in Cap-Haitien, Haiti. PPT was founded by Douglas Perlitz, who was recently sentenced to 235 months’ imprisonment based on his admi
King v. Statepublic domain
902 So.2d 736 (2004) Norman Deforrest KING v. STATE. CR-02-1823. Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama. February 27, 2004. Rehearing Denied April 23, 2004. Norman Deforrest King, pro se. William H. Pryor, Jr., and Troy King, attys. gen., and Jean-Paul M. Chappell, asst. atty. gen., for appellee. McMILLAN, Presiding Judge. The app
Coleman v. Statepublic domain
The appellant, William C. Coleman, appealed from the circuit court's denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., in which he challenged his April 7, 2008, guilty-plea convictions for first-degree rape, first-degree sodomy, and two counts of first-degree sexual abuse. Specifically, Coleman alleged in his Rule 32 petition that his guilty plea was involuntary because, he says, he was denied effective assistance of counsel. This Court affir
McCraw v. McCrawpublic domain
KING, P.J., for the Court: ¶ 1. Lester McCraw has appealed a judgment of the Forrest County Chancery Court, which awarded to his former wife, Gloria McCraw, delinquent child support of $200, delinquent alimony of $200 and a $100 per month increase in periodic alimony. Finding error in the increased alimony, we reverse and remand. FACTS ¶ 2. In July of 1994, the McCraws
State of Tennessee v. Steve Carl Kingpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 13, 2009 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. STEVE CARL KING Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Giles County No. 12504 Robert L. Jones, Judge No. M2008-01251-CCA-R3-CD - Filed April 9, 2010 A Giles County jury convicted the Defendant, Steve Carl King, of attempted first degree murder, and the tri
NO. 07-09-0261-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E FEBRUARY 3, 2011 DALE WINFIELD, GLORIA JOHNSON, AND JAMES WINFIELD, APPELLANTS v.
PER CURIAM: Defendant Denholm appeals the denial of his motion for summary judgment that was based upon his assertion of qualified immunity. Finding no error, we AFFIRM. I. Gloria Jean Harper, individually, and as mother and next friend of her son Jordan Harper, sued J.P. Denholm, individually,1 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for wrongful arrest, use of excessive f
NO. 07-09-0261-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E FEBRUARY 3, 2011 DALE WINFIELD, GLORIA JOHNSON, AND JAMES WINFIELD,
NO. 07-09-0261-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FO
Van Allen v. Blackledgepublic domain
35 S.W.3d 61 (2000) Terry VAN ALLEN, Denise Van Allen, Adam C. Albarado, Janet Albarado, Ian F. Brimble, Audrey S. Brimble, Raymond W. Buchanan, Patricia A. Buchanan, Higinia Cantu, Jr. Angela M. Cantu, Paul Davidson, Rhonda K. Davidson, David W. Dockens, Brenda J. Dockens, Robert L. Ellison, Judy L. Ellison, Kathryn F. Franklin, Anthony Harrison, Gloria Jean Harrison, Winford Holcomb, Jr., Mary Anne Holcomb, Patti J. Blair, Glenda G. Johnson, Todd A. Le
Lacasse v. Spaulding Youth Centerpublic domain
910 A.2d 1262 (2006) Gloria Jean LACASSE v. SPAULDING YOUTH CENTER. No. 2005-686. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued: July 20, 2006. Opinion Issued: October 13, 2006. *1263 Normandin, Cheney & O'Neil, PLLC, of Laconia (James F. Lafrance and James W. Kennedy on the brief, and Mr. Lafrance orally), for the
Killeen v. Statepublic domain
On August 15, 2006, the appellant, Michael Killeen, entered a guilty plea to first-degree robbery. The trial court sentenced him to serve a term of twenty years in prison, but split the sentence and ordered him to serve three years followed by four years on supervised probation. On August 29, 2008, the State initiated revocation proceedings. After conducting a hearing, the circuit court revoked Killeen's probation. This appeal followed. Killeen argues that the circuit court err
Benberry v. Statepublic domain
742 N.E.2d 532 (2001) Hilda J. BENBERRY, Appellant-Defendant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee. No. 49A02-0005-CR-330. Court of Appeals of Indiana. February 6, 2001. *533 Lesa Lux Johnson, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellant. Karen Freeman-Wilson, Attorney General of Indiana, Adam M. Dulik, Deputy Attorney General, India
Tuttle v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.public domain
118 F.Supp.2d 954 (2000) Gloria TUTTLE, as Trustee for the next-of-kin of Bill Tuttle, a.k.a. William R. Tuttle, deceased, Plaintiff, v. LORILLARD TOBACCO COMPANY; National Tobacco Company, L.P.; Worldwide Sports and Entertainment, f.k.a. National Tobacco Management Company; National Tobacco Finance Corporation; The Pinkerton Tobacco Company; and the Smokeless Tobacco Council; Defendants. No. Civ. 99-1550 PAMJGL.
Roizman v. Stromerpublic domain
Roizman v Stromer (2020 NY Slip Op 04196) Roizman v Stromer 2020 NY Slip Op 04196 Decided on July 22, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Fox v. Markpublic domain
Fox v Mark (2020 NY Slip Op 01477) Fox v Mark 2020 NY Slip Op 01477 Decided on March 4, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Freeman v. Kelvinator, Inc.public domain
469 F.Supp. 999 (1979) Donna FREEMAN, Gloria McDowell, Mary Lou Chapel, Deborah Gritter, Marilyn Kuiper, and Linda Prantel, Plaintiffs, v. KELVINATOR, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 572314. United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D. May 1, 1979. Jean L. King, Ann Arbor, Mich., for plaintiffs. Jack B. Combs and Edward Malinzak, Warner, Norcross & Ju
Burro v. Kangpublic domain
Burro v Kang (2018 NY Slip Op 08457) Burro v Kang 2018 NY Slip Op 08457 Decided on December 12, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
City of Louisville v. McDonaldpublic domain
This appeal arises from a declaratory judgment action filed by appellees to construe the Coordination of Benefits clause and the Subrogation clause of the City of Louisville's Health Benefits Plan. The claim was certified as a class action. The Jefferson Circuit Court entered judgment declaring that neither clause allowed the City to avoid payment under the Plan. After appropriate money judgments were entered on the various claims, the City appealed. After reviewing the record and the
662 F.3d 336 (2011) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION; Eric Skrmetta, In his capacity as Commissioner; James M. Field, In his capacity as Commissioner; Lambert C. Boissiere, III, In his capacity as Commissioner; Clyde C. Holloway, In his capacity as Commissioner; Foster L. Campbell, In his capacity as Commissioner; State of Louisiana, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-3124