Cases

PRICE, Chief Justice. This is an appeal by Carmen Arando from the judgment of the District Court of El Paso County, Texas, 65th Judicial District. Mahala Higgins, hereinafter called "ap-pellee” sued Carmen Arando, hereinafter called “appellant” to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by her through the negligence of said appellant, the negligence consisting in substance of- the negl

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action to recover a commission upon the sale of real estate owned by the defendants. The defendants gave the plaintiff an exclusive right to sell their property for three months. While the agreement was still in effect, the defendants themselves consummated a sale of the property to a third party. The defendants claim that the brokerage agreement was canceled or rescinded prior to the sale by mutual consent of the parties. In response t

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, brought this action to recover a commission upon the sale of real estate owned by the defendants. The defendants gave the plaintiff an exclusive right to sell their property for three months. While the agreement was still in effect, the defendants themselves consummated a sale of the property to a third party. The defendants claim that the brokerage agreement was canceled or rescinded prior to the sale by mutual consent of the parties. In response t

On February 17, 1909, C. B. Bell filed suit against J. P. Casey for the recovery of one-half of the proceeds of the sale of certain mining properties, the total proceeds of which sale amounted to $38,500, of which amount $2,500 had been previously paid to Casey, $15,500 thereof had been deposited to his account in the State National Bank, and $20,500 was to be placed to his account in said bank on or before April 25, 1909. The appointment of a receiver was asked, and an injunction was issued

MEMORANDUM DECISION NICHOL, Chief Judge. The States Attorney for Brookings County, South Dakota, has petitioned this court for review of an order of the Referee in Bankruptcy which held that the personal property tax lien of the county was inferior to the costs and expenses of administration of the bankrupt estate, there being no wage claims. The question presented is whether the tax lien was valid and en

237 F.2d 948 Harry C. WESTOVER, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, Sixth Collection District of California, Appellant,v.STOCKHOLDERS PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation, and George T. Goggin, Trustee in bankruptcy for its bankrupt estate, Appellees.Robert A. RIDDELL, Collector of Internal Revenue, Sixth Collection District of California, Appellant,v.STOCKHOLDERS PUBLISHING COMPANY, Inc., a Corporation, and George T. Goggi

MEMORANDUM HIGGINS, District Judge. The Court has before it the defendant Nebel’s motion (filed April 23, 1993; Docket Entry No. 355) to dismiss the indictment based on the government’s violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights, including Nebel’s right to due process; the memorandum (filed April 23, 1993; Docket Entry No. 356) in support of the motion; the government’s response (filed April 2

856 F.Supp. 388 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Russell White BROTHERS, Jr., G. Thomas Nebel, and Thomas White Brothers. No. 3-92-00102. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. February 26, 1993. Hal McDonough, Wendy Goggin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Nashville, TN, for plaintiff. *389 Michael E. Terry

856 F.Supp. 380 (1993) UNITED STATES of America v. Russell White BROTHERS, Jr., G. Thomas Nebel, and Thomas White Brothers. No. 3-92-00102. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. February 24, 1993. Hal McDonough, Wendy Goggin, Asst. U.S. Attys. Nashville, TN, for plaintiff. *381 Michael E. Terry,

856 F.Supp. 370 (1992) UNITED STATES of America v. Russell White BROTHERS, Jr., G. Thomas Nebel, and Thomas White Brothers. No. 3-92-00102. United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division. December 18, 1992. *371 *372 Hal McDonough, Wendy Goggin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Nashville,

MEMORANDUM HIGGINS, District Judge. The Court has before it the defendant Thomas Brothers’ motion1 (filed February 12, 1993; Docket Entry No. 245) to strike Overt Acts nine through fourteen of the Second Superseding Indictment; and the gov*387ernment’s response (filed February 23, 1993; Docket Entry No. 265)

Fuisz v 6 E. 72nd St. Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 06213) Fuisz v 6 E. 72nd St. Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 06213 Decided on December 05, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

Fuisz v 6 E. 72nd St. Corp. (2023 NY Slip Op 06213) Fuisz v 6 E. 72nd St. Corp. 2023 NY Slip Op 06213 Decided on December 05, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary L

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DONNA J. GIBSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) C.A. No. N16C-10-087 CLS METROPOLITAN GROUP ) PROPERTY AND CASUALTY ) INSURANCE COMPANY, GARY ) HIGGINS and JOHN DOORDAN,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47009 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: March 18, 2021 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) ROCCO JOSEPH CHACON, JR.,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 47009 STATE OF IDAHO, ) ) Filed: March 18, 2021 Plaintiff-Respondent, ) ) Melanie Gagnepain, Clerk v. ) ) ROCCO JOSEPH CHACON, JR.,

379 F.Supp.2d 96 (2005) Eric KELLEY, Plaintiff, v. Sheriff DIPAOLA, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.04-11192-NMG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 13, 2005. *97 Kenneth V. Desmond, Jr., Middlesex County Sheriff's Office, Cambridge, for Sheriff DiPaulo, Superintendent Norton, John Goggin, Lee Gartenberg, Sergeant

Robert N. Opel, II, Chief Bankruptcy Judge (BI) Chapter 13 Debtor filed a three-count adversary Complaint claiming a creditor, creditor's servicing agent, and creditor's counsel violated the automatic stay, Debtor's confirmed Chapter 13 Plan, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. In separate motions, all of the Defendants moved to dismiss the adversary Complaint. For the reasons stated below, the US Bank and SN Servicing Def

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOSEPH H. RODRIGUEZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion to remand and for attorneys’ fees and costs [13]. For the reasons set forth below, the case will be remanded, with each party to bear its own costs. Factual Background and Procedural History This matter was originally filed as a putativ

667 F.Supp.2d 461 (2009) Neil L. SARSFIELD and Shelley Sarsfield, Plaintiffs v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC. s/b/m to ABN Amro Mortgage Group, Inc., Defendant. Civil No. 1:09-CV-00835. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. October 21, 2009. *462 Jason A. Ostendorf, Law Office of Jason Ostendorf LLC, Baltimore, MD, Laurence C. Kr