Cases

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying the motion of appellant, Dana Goins, for leave to file a second petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Res judicata bars Goins from filing a successive habeas corpus petition to raise claims that he raised or could have raised in his previous petition. See

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.

[Cite as State v. Goins, 2019-Ohio-3135.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 18AP0046 Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE CHRISTOPHER L. GOINS

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Danny C. Reeves, United States District Judge Defendant Unlawful Narcotics Investigations, Treatment and Education, Inc. (“UNITE”) has filed a motion to dismiss the claims that Plaintiff Alberto Harris has asserted against it. [Record No. 6] With regard to the federal claims, UNITE argues that that it cannot be held liable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for allegations based on resp

[Cite as State v. Goins, 2015-Ohio-3121.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 14AP-747 (C.P.C. No. 13CR-4499) v. : (REG

In re Goins, Paul M.; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 334-120; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 94KW-1813. Denied. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

In re Oscar Goins, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Calcasieu. No. 7518-77. Denied.

In re Oscar Stevens Goins, applying for remedial writs. Parish of Calcasieu. No. 7518-77. Denied.

RIVES, Circuit Judge. On April 1, 1955, Anthony Meyers was brutally shot in the back while walking on a New Orleans sidewalk. Later the wound caused his death. On the evening of April 2,1955 at 8:50 P.M., Goins, then approximately eighteen years of age, was arrested. Since then, for nearly thirteen years he has remained in custody.

52 F.Supp.2d 638 (1999) Christopher GOINS, Petitioner, v. Ronald G. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Dept. of Corrections, Respondent. No. Civ.A. 97-1406-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. June 10, 1999. *639 *640 *641

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT CHRISTOPHER C. GOINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 99-13 RONALD ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-1406-A) Argued: June 6, 2000 Decided: August 31, 2000 Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

02/21/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 21, 2024 MICHAEL WHITE v. VINCENT VANTELL, WARDEN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Trousdale County No. 2023-CV-5040 Michael Wayne Collins, Judge ______________________________

BARHAM, J., concurs. Applicant has failed to attach the evidence presented in the trial court at his hearing to this application. He has not asked for or been denied a transcript of that evidence. Since he does not desire a review of the evidence, he apparently relies upon the trial judge’s reasons for denial of the writ as a correct finding of fact. A review of those reasons establishes a negation of relator’s allegations. T

Writs granted. The trial judge is ordered to hold an evidentiary hearing. ORDER On considering the petition of relator in the above numbered and entitled cause: IT IS ORDERED that the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, without undue delay, grant a full evidentiary hearing on relator’s petition for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and habeas corpus filed in that Co

Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM. The appellant here complains of the trial court’s dismissal, without a hearing, of his motion for new trial on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. The motion was made in a habeas corpus proceeding in which the trial court had issued an order denying appellant relief from a state conviction and sentence of execution. Upon the original fi