Cases

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700011 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MICHAEL M. FARRELL Lieutenant Colonel (O-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201700011 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. MICHAEL M. FARRELL Lieutenant Colonel (O-5), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

95 N.Y.2d 683 (2001) 746 N.E.2d 172 723 N.Y.S.2d 117 ABRAHAM GOLD, an Infant, by KATHLEEN A. GOLD, His Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Appellants, v. UNITED HEALTH SERVICES HOSPITALS, INC., Doing Business as CHARLES S. WILSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF MENTAL RETARDATION AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES et al., Respondents. KIMBERLY SANTIAGO, an Infant

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LORI W. WILL LEONARD L. WILLIAMS JUSTICE CENTER VICE CHANCELLOR 500 N. KING STREET, SUITE 11400 WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801-3734 Date Submitted: September 28, 2023

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Farrell v. Farrell, 710 So.2d 151, 152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (affirming order denying motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and holding that matrimonial domicile was established in Florida where “parties lived together as husband and wife either actually or constructively”) (citation omitted); Durand v. Durand, 569 So.2d 838 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).

CHIASSON, Judge. Plaintiff Clarence R. Farrell appeals the dismissal of his suit against Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin 1 (Employers) on an exception of lack of in personam jurisdiction. The plaintiff, a Louisiana resident, alleges in his petition that he suffered severe injuries on June 1, 1976, while attempting to lower a burial vault into a grave located in

*619OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Final judgment entered January 10, 1986 reversed, and case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision, with $30 costs to abide the event. The within holdover proceeding was originally brought upon a petition alleging that tenants had sublet and/or assigned the commercial premi

DIETZ, Judge. *65In 2013, a Raleigh police officer pulled over a car driven by Petitioner Peter Farrell. When the officer approached Farrell, he noticed that Farrell's eyes were glassy and bloodshot and that his speech was slightly slurred. The officer returned to his patrol car to wait for backup. When he returned to question Farrell further, the

Opinion DUPONT, J. In this medical malpractice action, the plaintiffs, Nancy B. Farrell and Cynthia B. Grocki,1 *806appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendants, David M. Bass, aplastic surgeon, and his medical practice, David M. Bass, M.D., P.C. The verdict

DONOHUE, Presiding Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 6, 2012) THIS MATTER is before the Court on two motions filed by Defendants, Hovic and Hess Corporation; 1) Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel, Attorney Theodore Huge, Esq., and the Law Firm of Motley Rice. LLC; and 2) Motion to Disqualify Plaintiffs’ Counsel. Attorney Theodore Huge, Esq., Attorney Russell Pate Esq., and th

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN RE PARAMOUNT GOLD AND SILVER CONSOLIDATED CORP. STOCKHOLDERS LITIGATION C.A. No. 10499-CB MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: February 10, 2017 Date Decided: April 13, 2017 Seth D. Rigrodsky, Brian D. Long, Gina M. Serra, and Jeremy J. Riley, RIGRODSKY & LONG, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Derrick B. Farrell, DLA PIPER US LLP, Wilmington

Opinion ROGERS, C. J. The plaintiffs, Leo Gold, Joan S. Levy and the executors of the estate of Bernard Manger, Harold Bernstein and Joseph Lieberman, brought this action seeking a permanent injunction barring the defendant, the town of East Haddam, from condemning their property. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that the taking was barred because th

211 B.R. 79 (1997) In re Thomas Thornton FARRELL, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 96-02805-6B3. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. March 24, 1997. Bruce Kaufman, Largo, FL, for debtor. Laurie K. Weatherford, Winter Park, FL, trustee. Randy Gold, Orlando, FL, for U.S. Dept. of Treasury, IRS. MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from an order and judgment (one document) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, A.J.), entered March 20, 2003. The order and judgment granted plaintiff’s “cross-cross motion” for leave to amend the complaint and for summary judgment and awarded plaintiff judgment in the amount of $15,876 with interest, costs and disbursements. It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same her

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs, (see Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51; Nelson v Unicure, Inc., 72 AD2d 904). (Appeal from order and judgment of Jefferson Supreme Court—separation agreement.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.

646 A.2d 963 (1994) Leroy FARRELL, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 92-CO-1065. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued August 4, 1994. Decided August 17, 1994. *964 Laurie B. Davis, Public Defender Service, with whom James Klein and Sandra K. Levick, Public Defender Service, were on the brief, fo

On Motion for Rehearing. (50 Pac. 186.) Mr. Justice Bean delivered the opinion. 8. It is claimed that the return of service of the summons in the case at bar is fatally defective, because it does not show that Walters, president of the defendant, upon whom it was made, either resided or had ah office in Union County at the time. Subdivision 1, § 55

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY delivered the opinion of the court. This action was commenced in September, 1899, by the •filing of a complaint containing two causes of action. The first is for the recovery of $425.25, alleged to have been furnished by the plaintiff, Farrell, to the defendant company, and which amount the company promised to repay, but failed and neglected to do so. The second cause of action is for the

(July 26, 1965) Jacob Markowitz, J. After reading the compliance reports and after hearing argument on June 23, June 30, July 13, and July 26, the court directs the next apprenticeship class of 65 apprentices to be established on October 30,1965. All interested parties are forthwith directed to comply with the foregoing. *245(August 2

Per Curiam. In this proceeding to enforce an order of the State Commission for Human Eights — the object of which was to compel the parties to cease and desist from discriminating against Negroes in the selection of sheet metal apprentices—■ the court ordered that a new class of 65 apprentices be established by October 30, 1965. The appellants appeal from this order dated July 26, 1965. The appellants do not object to