⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

17 opinions for “Goldstein, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Ford & Harrison, LLP”

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2006-03-20 · Published · cited 35× · 340 B.R. 1; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 429; 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 93; 2006 WL 770441
340 B.R. 1 (2006) In re MONAHAN FORD CORPORATION OF FLUSHING, Debtor. Alan Nisselson, Esq., as Chapter 7 Co-Trustee of Monahan Ford Corporation of Flushing, Plaintiffs, v. Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Credit Company, George Papantoniou a/k/a/ George Pappas, Kay Papantoniou, Gadi Ben-Hamo, National Star Executive Sales, LLC, Jossef Kahlon, Samuel Goldstein & Co., P.C., Stuart Goldstein and Steve Leon, Defendants. Ba
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2008-03-31 · Published · cited 25× · 387 B.R. 365; 2008 Bankr. LEXIS 1051; 2008 WL 877213
387 B.R. 365 (2008) In re ALLOU DISTRIBUTORS, INC., et al., Debtors. Kenneth P. Silverman, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Allou Distributors, Inc., et al., Plaintiff, v. H.I.L. Associates Ltd., Tereza Merchandising Corporation, Morgren Construction Corp., Israel Greenfield, Herbert Greenfield and the Estate of Morris Greenfield, deceased, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 03-82321-ess. Adversary No. 05-8109-ess.
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2018-01-19 · Published · cited 0× · 289 F. Supp. 3d 905
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Chief Judge This case is the latest in a series of challenges to various statutory provisions that were enacted as part of House Enrolled Act 1337. This Act codified a number of abortion-related provisions, some civil and some criminal. In this action, Plaintiffs the Trustees of Indiana University, Fred Cate, Dr. Bruce Lamb, and Dr. Debomoy Lahiri (collectively "IU") challenge a provision that crim
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2011-12-14 · Published · cited 0× · 29 Mass. L. Rptr. 305
Fabricant, Judith, J. This action arises out of plaintiffs’ investment in two hedge funds, Dutchess Private Equities, L.P. and Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd. Plaintiffs Cannonball Fund, Ltd., Cannonball Plus Fund, Ltd., East Orient, Ltd., Mark Wenzel, The Trustees of the Geraldine Schwab Irrevocable Trust, and The Carrswold Partnership bring this action individually and derivatively in their capacity as limited partners of
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011-03-31 · Published · cited 28× · 786 F. Supp. 2d 887; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34839; 2011 WL 1260207
786 F.Supp.2d 887 (2011) Ryan McFADYEN, Matthew Wilson and Breck Archer, Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. No. 1:07CV953. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina. March 31, 2011. *898 Robert C. Ekstrand, Ekstrand & Ekstrand, LLP, Durham, NC, for Plaintiffs. Jamie S. Gorelick, Jennifer M. O'C
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-06-29 · Published · cited 3× · 257 F. Supp. 3d 463
OPINION & ORDER KATHERINE B. FORREST, District Judge: Before the Court are a number of separate actions (the “Judgment Creditor actions” or “turnover actions”) brought by judgment creditors (“Judgment Creditors”) of the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran (the “Government of Iran”). The Judgment Creditors seek to enforce their judgments against property owned by defendants the Alavi Foundation (“A
California Court of Appeal · 2000-07-10 · Published · cited 97× · 97 Cal. Rptr. 2d 797; 82 Cal. App. 4th 19; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5686; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 7517; 2000 Cal. App. LEXIS 541
97 Cal.Rptr.2d 797 (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 19 Richard U. LEALAO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BENEFICIAL CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Respondent. No. A085992. Court of Appeal, First District, Division Two. July 10, 2000. *800 Robert A. Goldstein, Oakland, Daniel J. Mulligan, Jenkins & Mulligan
SEC v. Jarkesypublic domain
Supreme Court of the United States · 2024-06-27 · Published · cited 68× · 603 U.S. 109
PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 109–203 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009-06-01 · Published · cited 17× · 623 F. Supp. 2d 798; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51577
623 F.Supp.2d 798 (2009) In Re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. American National Insurance Company, et al., Plaintiffs, v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Defendant. No. MDL-1446. Civil Action Nos. H-01-3624, G-02-0299. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.<
District Court, S.D. New York · 2001-11-28 · Published · cited 11× · 174 F. Supp. 2d 70; 2001 WL 1516733
174 F.Supp.2d 70 (2001) In re INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING SECURITIES LITIGATION. No. 21 MC 92(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 28, 2001. *71 *72 Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel: Melvyn I. Weiss, Esq., Ariana J. Tadler, Esq., Peter G.A. Saferstein, Esq., Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2003-10-16 · Published · cited 114× · 284 F. Supp. 2d 511; 2003 WL 22245394
284 F.Supp.2d 511 (2003) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION, Pamela M. Tittle, Thomas O. Padgett, Gary S. Dreadin, Janice Farmer, Linda Bryan, John L. Moore, Betty J. Clark, Shelly Farias, Patrick Campbell, Fanette Perry, Charles Prestwood, Roy Rinard, Steve Lacey, Catherine Stevens, Roger W. Boyce, Wayne M. Stevens, Norman L. and Paula H. Young, Michael L. McCown, and Dan Schultz, on behalf of themselves and a cl
District Court, E.D. New York · 2002-09-19 · Published · cited 16× · 211 F.R.D. 86; 2002 WL 32155895; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19647
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. 1. Introduction This memorandum and order addresses plaintiffs’ application for class certification. See Third Amended Class Action Complaint and Supplemental Memorandum in Support Amended and Renewed Motion for Class Certification, dated July 26, 2002. Extensive briefing and argument by the parties on the issue have been con
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00409-CV 8019009 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/30/2015 4:14:06 PM
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler) · 2015-09-04 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM