Cases

235 Wis.2d 325 (2000) 2000 WI 51 611 N.W.2d 659 Christine MORDEN, Plaintiff-Respondent-Cross-Appellant-Petitioner, Thomas MORDEN, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin Health Organization and Compcare, Plaintiffs, v. CONTINENTAL AG, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Respondent,[†] MR. P'S IDEAL TIRES CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 98-0073.

476 F.Supp.2d 314 (2007) BIG APPLE TIRE, INC., Plaintiff, v. TELESECTOR RESOURCES GROUP, INC. d/b/a Verizon Services Group, Defendant. No. 05 Civ. 8870(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 14, 2007. *315 Kenneth P. Thomson, Michelle le Roux, Thompson Wigdor & Gilly LLP, New York, New York, Derek Sells,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MAROVICH, District Judge. Plaintiff Mary Hopson (“Hopson”) filed this action against her former employer, Defendant Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), alleging that Continental terminated her employment because of her age — 46, at the time of her termination— and/or her race — African-American—in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADE

826 F.Supp. 677 (1993) Marjorie DATSKOW, Executrix of the Estates of Robert C. Gross and Susan C. Gross, deceased, and Administratrix of the Estates of Michael and David Gross, deceased, and Grossair, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS AIRCRAFT PRODUCTS, A DIVISION OF TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant. No. 88-CV-1299L. United States District Court, W.D. New York.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PANKAJ MERCHIA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 23-3913 (RC) ) HARVARD PILGRIM

[Cite as Turner v. Pontones, 2025-Ohio-253.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CARROLL COUNTY SHERRY TURNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMR. OF THE ESTATE OF MEGHAN M. TURNER, DECEASED, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. KELLY A. PONTONES, ET AL.,

[Cite as Sutter v. Henkle, 2016-Ohio-1143.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY LANA SUTTER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 10-15-14 v. STACEY HENKLE, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Celina Municipal Court Trial

ROTHENBERG, J. (dissenting). Simply put, the majority affirms the trial court’s order transferring a lawsuit filed by a United States citizen, who resides in California, against several Florida defendants on the basis of forum non conve-niens. Because the trial court and the majority failed to afford proper deference to the plaintiffs choice of forum, and the record reflects that the defendants failed to estab

OPINION AND ORDER BE SOSA, District Judge Two Puerto Rican municipalities, Huma-cao and Peñuelas, passed ordinances restricting the use of ash derived from coal combustion within their territorial borders. AES Puerto Rico, L.P. (“AES-PR”), a coal-fired power plant owner, filed suit against the municipalities to challenge the legality of the ordinances. (Docket No. 1.) Before the Court a

OPINION OF THE COURT AMBRO, Circuit Judge. Table of Contents I. Factual and Procedural Background..........................................588 II. Jurisdiction and Standard of Review..........................................590 III. Preliminary Matters.....................................

OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Lori Woida and Carolyn Viera are former employees of Genesys Regional Medical Center. They are suing their former employer and their former supervisor, Jennifer Roth, for alleged violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act. This matter is present

OPINION OF THE COURT (October 24, 2014) HODGE, Chief Justice. Appellant Adelbert Bryan appeals from the Superior Court’s October 10, 2014 order, which denied his motion to enforce its August 29, 2014 order implementing this Court’s August 28, 2014 opinion disqualifying Alicia “Chucky” Hansen from the general election ballot for membership in the 31st Legislature, and to hold the S

DANIEL KELLY, J. ¶ 1. The question before the court is whether the State compelled Petitioner, Brian Harris, to be a witness against himself in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution.1 I. BACKGROUND f 2. In the early morning hours of August 13, 2011, a Kenosha resident awoke to loud

OPINION Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice This appeal arises out of a dispute between an insurer and its insureds as to the insurer’s duty to defend. We must determine whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and declaring as a matter of law that (1) the insurer must defend its insureds in the underlying suit and (2) the insureds have the right to select their defense counsel and require

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 18, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D23-1860 Lower Tribunal No. 22-602 ________________ Catalina West Homeowners Association, Inc., Appellant,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

Filed 6/8/22 ; Certified for Publication 6/29/22 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE KELLY ILCZYSZYN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A158352 v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO., (Alameda County

Opinion KITCHING, J. Plaintiff John Maxton alleges he sustained personal injuries as a result of working with metal products manufactured by defendants1 and supplied to Maxton’s employer. The metal products were essentially raw materials because they could be used in innumerable ways. The issue on appeal is whether Maxton can maintain his negligence and strict liability causes of ac

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION........................................................1007 A. Factual Background................................................1007 B. Procedural Background..............................

2017 WI 31 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP1767-CR COMPLETE TITLE: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Brian I. Harris, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS