Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gonzalez v. Prunty”
Gonzalez v. Pruntypublic domain
JUDGMENT TAKASUGI, District Judge. Pursuant to the Order of the Court adopting the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and the action is dismissed with prejudice. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE J
People v. Pruntypublic domain
—Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), rendered June 16, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the Supreme Court, New York County (Adlerberg, J.), upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
Gonzalez v. Schriropublic domain
MEMORANDUM** Arizona state prisoner Narcisco Pax Gonzalez appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the dismissal of a § 2254 petition, *127Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm.
Gonzalez v. Careypublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Jesus Alonso Gonzalez appeals pro se the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his conviction for attempted murder and kidnaping. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo, see Miles v. Prunty, 187 F.3d 1104, 1105 (9th Cir.1999), and we affirm. Gonzalez first contends that the prosecution permitte
Frederico Gonzalez v. Cheryl Pliler, Wardenpublic domain
THOMAS, Circuit Judge. California prisoner Frederieo Gonzalez appeals the dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, arguing that forcing him to wear a stun belt during his trial violated his right of due process. We conclude that an evidentiary hearing is required to resolve this claim and remand the case to the district court. I
Prunty v. Allredpublic domain
73 Cal.App.2d 67 (1946) MARY GLADYS PRUNTY, Respondent, v. JOHN CLEET ALLRED et al., Appellants. Civ. No. 3185. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Dist. Feb. 14, 1946. Borton, Petrini, Conron & Borton, Cooley, Crowley & Supple, Cooley, Crowley, Gainther & Dana and Paul Dana for Appellants. Rae B. Carter, John D. Chinello and Dorsey & Cam
Guernsey Community Federal Credit Union v. Gonzalezpublic domain
OPINION OSBORN, Justice. This is a malicious prosecution case in which the trial Court awarded damages based upon jury findings. We affirm. Ramon J. Gonzalez, Appellee, while a resident of Wyoming, purchased a 1966 Chevrolet automobile, which he financed through Guernsey Community Federal Credit Union, Appellant. The loan papers were signed on September 5, 1969. On February 21, 1970, A
108 F.3d 251 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1679, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 3149Herman J. BLUEFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.K.W. PRUNTY, Warden; K. Daniels; B.H. Moses; C. Basilio;M.E. Bourland, Correctional Officer II atCalipatria State Prison; ArnoldTrujillo, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-56725. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued an
388 F.3d 1199 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Frank FERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Roy Gavaldon, aka Spider, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.David Gonzales-Contreras, aka David Contreras-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Dominick Shewmaker Gonzales, aka Solo, aka Domi
United States v. Jermaine Hardimanpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 16-50422 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:10-cr-00923-SJO-5 JERMAINE HARDIMAN, AKA J- Killa, Defendant-Appellant. JERMAINE HARDIMAN, AKA J- No. 18-56633 Killa, Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 2:1
People v. Valenciapublic domain
Filed 5/24/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT THE PEOPLE, F078964 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CRF30714) v. DAVID J. VALENCIA, OPINION
Helvetica Servicing Inc v. Michael S Pasquanpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA H ELVETICA SERVICING, INC., Plaintiff/Appellant, v. MICHAEL S. PASQUAN, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-19-0242-PR Filed August 25, 2020 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County The Hono
People v. Samuelspublic domain
TANGEMAN, J. *964In 2011, the Legislature enacted the Criminal Justice Realignment Act (Realignment Act or Act) to address public safety issues. ( People v. Scott (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1415, 1418,
People v. Multanipublic domain
Filed 11/26/24 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, B332945 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GA093728) v. FAHIM ANTHONY MULTANI, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior C
Ramirez v. Superior Court of Imperial Cnty.public domain
HALLER, Acting P. J. *647Guadalupe Fabian Ramirez petitions this court for a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order extraditing him to Arizona. Ramirez contends he is mentally incompetent and the court's order extraditing him violates his due process rights. Ramirez seeks placement in an appropriate mental health faci
People v. Samuelspublic domain
Filed 3/28/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B280619 (Super. Ct. No. 1450951) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Santa Barbara County) v. KODY LEE SAMUELS, Defendant and Appellant. In 2011, the Legislature enacted the Criminal Justice Rea
Johnson v. Hamletpublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner-Appellant Claudius Johnson appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus as time-barred. Johnson contends that the statute of limitations should be statutorily and/or equitably tolled to render his petition timely filed under the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
Brian McMonagle v. Don Meyerpublic domain
OPINION NGUYEN, Circuit Judge: Brian McMonagle seeks federal habeas review of a California misdemeanor conviction for driving while under the influence of alcohol. The district court dismissed McMonagle’s petition as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”), and he appealed. In order to determine the timeliness of McMona
People v. Costellapublic domain
Opinion RAMIREZ, P. .1. I. INTRODUCTION Defendant and appellant, Keith Julian Costella, shot his victim, dumped his body in an undeveloped area next to a highway, and set fire to it. A jury convicted him of second degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)) 1 and arson of fores
People v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Filed 12/7/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, B303099 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA071098) v. DAVID DANIEL RODRIGUEZ, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, M