⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

6 opinions for “Gordon v. Cimon”

Lynn v. Kroenungpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-07-25 · Published · cited 12× · 97 A.D.3d 822; 949 N.Y.2d 144
Pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (b) (5) (i), a court must begin its child support calculation with the parent’s gross income “as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return” (see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [i]). However, the court may also consider income for the tax year not yet completed (see Eberhardt-Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 1487, 1488 [2010]; Matter of Azrak v Azrak,
Lynn v. Kroenungpublic domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 97 A.D.3d 822; 949 N.Y.2d 144
Pursuant to Family Court Act § 413 (1) (b) (5) (i), a court must begin its child support calculation with the parent’s gross income “as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return” (see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [b] [5] [i]). However, the court may also consider income for the tax year not yet completed (see Eberhardt-Davis v Davis, 71 AD3d 1487, 1488 [2010]; Matter of Azrak v Azrak,
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-11-09 · Published · cited 31× · 2016 NY Slip Op 7287; 144 A.D.3d 723; 41 N.Y.S.3d 250
*724 Appeal by the defendant from stated portions of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Gerald E. Loehr, J.), dated September 11, 2013. The judgment of divorce, upon an amended decision of that court dated August 5, 2013, made after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (a) imputed annual income to the defendant in the am
DeLoach v. Airdpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007-09-07 · Published · cited 8× · 989 So. 2d 652; 2007 WL 2552071
989 So.2d 652 (2007) Dennis R. DeLOACH, Jr., and Peter T. Hofstra, Petitioners, v. Hugh AIRD, Bob (G.W.R.) Anderson, Ian Anderson, Anne Marie Anderson, Armand Archambault, Beverly Armitage, Earnest Armitage, Elias Attar, Jossee Attar, Barbara Bell, Bernice Belliveau, Gail Beron, Kenneth Blanchette, Lucille Blakenship, Harry Blinkhorn, Elizabeth Blinkhorn, John Boitos, Robert Bowman, Terri Brothers, Franklin Wannemacher, Lise Brunet, James Burgess
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014-03-07 · Published · cited 52× · 744 F.3d 773; 109 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2009; 2014 WL 888909; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4306
HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Over a century ago, Mark Twain lamented that “[ojnly one thing is impossible for God: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet.” Mark Twain, The Complete Works of Mark Twain: Mark Twain’s Notebook 381 (Albert Bigelow Paine ed., 1935). We fear that Twain’s deity would fare little better with the tangled skein of copyright and
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri