Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Gordon v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC”
Balon v. Enhanced Recovery Co.public domain
MEMORANDUM William J. Nealon, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Kariann Balón, filed a complaint against Defendant, Enhanced Recovery Company, Inc., alleging that Defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act,15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. (“FDCPA”). (Doc. 1). On March 16, 2016, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and brief in
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA ) PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ) Supreme Court Nos. S-18318/18357 AS
Msp Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 22-cv-1419 (DLF) PFIZER, INC. et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Five limited liability companies—MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC; MSP Recovery Claims PROV,
Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCpublic domain
Rainford G. Bartlett v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, No. 64, September Term 2013, and James Townsend v. Midland Funding, LLC, No. 76, September Term 2013, Opinion by Greene, J. SMALL CLAIM ACTIONS – JUDGMENT ON AFFIDAVIT – ASSIGNED CONSUMER DEBT CASES In pursuing a judgment on affidavit, involving a small or large claim, a debt buyer plaintiff must produce certain documents, as contemplated by Maryland Rule 3-306(d), sufficient to pass muster under the business records exception. Once a
Benihana of Tokyo, LLC v. Angelo, Gordon & Co.public domain
OPINION & ORDER Paul A. Engelmayer, United States District Judge This case is the latest in a series of lawsuits — the fifth in this Court during the past four years — between two “Benihana” entities. Relevant heré, Benihana, Inc. (“BI”) has the right to operate the iconic Benihana restaurants within the United States, save in Hawaii, where Benihana of Tokyo, LLC (“BOT”) has a contractual license from BI to
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE BAND’S VISIT NATIONAL ) TOUR LLC; BANDSTAND TOUR ) LLC; BMGNET TOURING LLC; ) BRONX TOURING LLC; CATS ON ) TOUR LLC; CHOCOLATE ) TOURING LLC; ESCAPE ON ) TOUR LLC; HOSANNA TOUR LLC; ) LMS TOURING LLC; MY FAIR ) LADY ON TOUR; OOTI TOURING ) LLC; SAI TOURING LLC; ) SBSP TOURING LLC; ) TCP TOURING LL
Gordon v. Harman (In re Harman)public domain
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS MARGARET H. MURPHY, Bankruptcy Judge. This proceeding is before the court on Joseph H. Harman’s Motion to Dismiss, filed August 28, 2013 (Doc. No. 27) (“Debtor’s Motion”), and on the Motion to Dismiss of Linda J. Harman (“Mrs. Har-man”), the Linda J. Harman Irrevocable Trust (the “Trust”), J.H.H. Holdings Corporation (“JHH”), First Equities Partners, Inc. (“FE
Gordon v. Harman (In re Harman)public domain
ORDER ON SHADRIX LANE, P.C.’S MOTION TO DISMISS MARGARET H. MURPHY, Bankruptcy Judge. This proceeding is before the court on Defendant Shadrix Lane, P.C.’s Motion to Dismiss, filed September 12, 2013 (Doc. No. 29) (the “Motion”). Debtor filed his Chapter 7 petition June 14, 2011. The Chapter 7 Trustee initiated this proceeding by filing a Complaint June 13, 2013, against Debtor and related persons a
Terracino v. Gordon and Hillerpublic domain
1 A.3d 97 (2010) 121 Conn.App. 795 Jerome G. TERRACINO et al. v. GORDON AND HILLER et al. No. 29837. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued October 27, 2009. Decided June 22, 2010. *98 Michael S. Lynch, Shelton, for the appellants (plaintiffs). Robert W. Cassot, with whom, on the br
Gordon v. Pete's Auto Service of Denbigh, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER F. BRADFORD STILLMAN, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter has been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge on consent of the parties, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment. I. BACKGROUND
Gordon v. Lewistown Hospitalpublic domain
272 F.Supp.2d 393 (2003) Alan D. GORDON, M.D.; Alan D. Gordon, M.D., P.C.; Mifflin County Community Surgical Center, Inc., Plaintiffs v. LEWISTOWN HOSPITAL, Defendant No. CIV.1:CV-99-1100. United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania. July 11, 2003. *394 *395 *
Richard Webber v. Armslist, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3198 RICHARD WEBBER, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Sara J. Schmidt, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARMSLIST LLC and JONATHAN GIBBON, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from
Erin Bauer v. Armslist, LLCpublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3198 RICHARD WEBBER, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Sara J. Schmidt, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARMSLIST LLC and JONATHAN GIBBON, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from
Miltner Insurance Services, LLC v. Robertspublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-0796 Filed May 8, 2024 MILTNER INSURANCE SERVICES, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, vs. CASEY M. ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Adams County, Brad McCall, Judge. Parties appeal and cross-appeal the district court’s rem
Schwartzco Enterprises LLC v. TMH Management, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. On February 19, 2014, the Plaintiffs Schwartzco Enterprises, LLC (“Schwartzco”), a New York limited liability company; the Meat House — Roslyn LLC (“TMH Roslyn”), a New York limited liability company; and Arnold M. Schwartz, an individual resident of New *338York (collectively the “Plaintiffs”
United States of America v. Google LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3010 (APM) ) GOOGLE LLC,
Erickson v. Pharmacia LLCpublic domain
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON OCTOBER 30, 2025 IN CLERK’S OFFICE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON OCTOBER 30, 2025 SARAH R. PENDLETON
Sodexomagic, LLC v. Drexel Univ.public domain
Baylson, District Judge I. Introduction...435 II. Factual Background...436 (A) The Parties...436 (B) The Bid Process...436 (C) Reaching the Terms of the Management Agreement...438 (D) Freshman Enrollment Declines...440 (E) Sodexo Misses Profit Projections...441 (F) Contract Termination...441 III. Mo
Bowlin, Nicole v. Servall, LLCpublic domain
TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD (HEARD JANUARY 10, 2018, AT JACKSON) Nicole Bowlin ) Docket No. 2017-07-0224 ) v. ) State File No. 76010-2016 ) Servall, LLC, et al. ) )