⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Gowan v. Stapleton”

District Court, E.D. New York · 2014-03-03 · Published · cited 2× · 2 F. Supp. 3d 391; 2014 WL 824291
*394MEMORANDUM & ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, District Judge. I. BACKGROUND A. Charged Criminal Conduct Defendant is charged by a twenty-three count indictment with leading a racketeering enterprise between approximately January 1998 and October 2010, responsible for the commission of murder, attempted murder,
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-07-15 · Published · cited 593× · 533 F.3d 183; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 14984; 2008 WL 2736293
533 F.3d 183 (2008) Susan STARTZELL; Nancy Major; James Cruse; Gerald Fennell; Randall Beckman; Linda Beckman; Michael Marcavage; Mark Diener; Dennis Green; Arlene Elshinnawy; Lauren Murch, a minor, by and through her parent and next friend, Beverly Murch, Appellants v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA; Lynne Abraham, In Her Official Capacity as District Attorney for the City and County of Philadelphia; William V. Fisher, In His Official and In
District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2008-09-09 · Published · cited 0× · 575 F. Supp. 2d 940; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82578; 2008 WL 4148731
575 F.Supp.2d 940 (2008) Thomas CANNON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent. Case No. 07-CV-2044. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Urbana Division. September 9, 2008. *944 Lawrence S. Beaumont, Law Office of Lawrence S. Beaumont, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Timothy A. Bass, Office of U.S. Attor
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895-09-07 · Published · cited 69× · 41 P. 729; 3 Okla. 404; 1895 OK 83; 1895 Okla. LEXIS 45
OPINION OF THE COURT. The opinion of the court was delivered by Various motions were filed by the defendant company in this court in this case, after the filing of the petition in error and transcript of record here, upon June 6, 1895. Under the direction of the court, these motions were argued orally, and upon printed briefs in connection with the argument upon *Page 450 the merits of the case as presented in the tr