Cases

624 F.Supp.2d 1280 (2009) GRABHORN, INC., an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, v. METROPOLITAN SERVICE DISTRICT, Defendant. Civil Case No. 08-1512-KI. United States District Court, D. Oregon. May 19, 2009. *1282 George W. McKallip, Jr., Jeff D. Brecht, Sussman Shank LLP, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff. Dan Cooper, Michelle A. Be

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS C. ASHLEY ROYAL, SENIOR JUDGE Plaintiffs Flint Riverkeeper, Inc., Jere Michael Cox, Shelby Cox Moore, Granville Cliff Moore, and Sean Draime claim Defendant Southern Mills’s discharge of industrial wastewater violates the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (Clean Water Act, or CWA), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251, et seq,, and Georgia law. Before the Court is Defendant’s Mo

DUNCAN, Justice, dissenting. I respectfully dissent. The summary judgment evidence conclusively establishes Tiffany’s ownership of the necklace. I would therefore affirm the trial court’s summary judgment in Tiffany’s favor. In support of its motion for summary judgment, Tiffany introduced three affidavits: Roger John Coleman, Tiffany’s manager of investigations and the person who investiga

*781FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Tennessee Clean Water Network and Tennessee Scenic Rivers Association (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”) alleging numerous violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) related to TVA’s operation of a

HOTTEL, C. J. The Industrial Board has certified to this court for its decision and determination under §61 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Acts 1915 p. 392) certain questions of law based on the following facts as certified to by said board: On February 17, 1916, Lewis Grabhorn, hereinafter referred to as “G,” was in the service of the CottonWiebke Company, hereinafter referred to as “the co