Cases

Tierney, J. This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The plaintiffs, Melissa Silva (Melissa) and Andrew Pierre (Andrew),2 brought this action seeking both declaratory and injunctive relief to enforce rights they claim they are entitled to under G.L.c. 123B, §3 and the companion regulations, whenever the Department of Mental Ret

Xifaras, J. The plaintiffs, Patrick F. Grady, Melissa Silva and Andrew Pierre, bring this motion, through their guardians, seeking an injunction that would require the Department of Mental Retardation (DMR) to maintain their current residential placement and funding until DMR either obtains consent to a transfer or prevails at a transfer hearing. DMR opposes the motion arguing, primarily, that Grady is not entitled to a transfe

618 So.2d 341 (1993) Isaiah Johnson GRADY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 90-00590, 90-00594. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. May 14, 1993. *342 James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Karen K. Purdy, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., T

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant state of Ohio appeals from an order suppressing evidence. The only issue raised in this appeal is whether defendant-appellee Donald Campbell was the subject of an investigative stop, or whether there was a mere consensual encounter between Campbell and the police officer, who ultimately found what appeared to be Valium, a controlled substance, upon Campbell's person. {¶ 2} Both the arresting police officer and Camp

PER CURIAM. Leon Grady challenges several conditions of his probation imposed upon revocation of his community control. We strike the condition that requires Grady to “visit no bars, restaurants, or any place where alcoholic beverages are served without written permission from Probation Officer” and the condition that he is “not to be within (3) three blocks of known high drug areas as determined by his Probation Officer.”

[Cite as State ex rel. Ritzie v. Reece-Campbell, Inc., 2014-Ohio-2782.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. Fred Ritzie, : Relator, : v. : No. 13AP-669 Reece-Campbell, Inc. and : (REGULAR CALENDA

OPINION OF THE COURT BY POLLACK, J. This case concerns a negligence action against the State of Hawaii and the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (collectively, the “State”) involving a rockfall and related ear accident on a state highway. The Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (the “circuit court”) determined that, although the State breache

[Cite as Fahey Banking Co. v. Grady & Assocs., 2024-Ohio-159.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA THE FAHEY BANKING COMPANY, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 112417 v. : GRADY AND ASSOCIATES, ET AL.,

Appellate Case: 23-6186 Document: 110-1 Date Filed: 09/30/2025 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS September 30, 2025

12/30/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 7, 2019 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. GRADY ALTON VEST Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County Nos. 17043-2, 17064-2 Donald H. Allen, Judge ___________________________________

[Cite as Campbell v. Campbell, 2014-Ohio-5614.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO CHARLENE L. CAMPBELL, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2014-L-015 - vs - : TIMOTHY SEAN CAMPBELL, e

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT GRADY C. LOVE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) C

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 10, 2013 Session KAREN GRADY AND TIMOTHY GRADY v. SUMMIT FOOD CORPORATION D/B/A PITA PIT Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 10C2893 Thomas W. Brothers, Judge No. M2012-02493-COA-R3-CV - Filed August 13, 2013 Customer of a restaurant who was

734 N.W.2d 364 (2007) 2007 WI 81 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Vincent T. GRADY, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2005AP2424-CR. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Argued March 7, 2007. Decided June 29, 2007. *366 For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs and oral

OPINION ROBERT J. JONKER, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This is a habeas corpus action brought by a state prisoner under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Promptly after the filing of a petition for habeas corpus, the Court must undertake a preliminary review of the petition to determine whether “it plainly appears from the face of the petition and any exhibits annexed to it that the petitioner is not entitled to relie

ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Calvin Campbell ("Defendant"), convicted of a felony drug crime in 2007, faces charges that he violated the terms and conditions of supervised release by possessing and trafficking in illegal narcotics. On August 2, 2018, New York State Troopers stopped Defendant driving a black Toyota Venza with illegally tinted wi

Gordon, Robert B., J. The Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in connection with Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction, and considered the arguments of counsel advanced at the hearing held on March 24, 2016. It is the conclusion of the undersigned that plaintiff Elizabeth Grady Face First, Inc. (“Elizabeth Grady” or the “Company”) has demonstrated neither a likelihood of success on the merits of its claims, nor a

PER CURIAM: This appeal by a prisoner of the State of Georgia is from the denial of habeas corpus relief in the district court. The pertinent facts will be found in the decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Georgia in connection with appellant’s state court appeal. Campbell v. State, 226 Ga. 883, 178 S.E.2d 257 (1970), cert. d

METZGER **, J. The People seek review of the trial court’s ruling and jury instructions concerning the elements of the charge of sexual exploitation of a child. We disapprove the ruling. Defendant, James Stephen Grady, was charged with thirty-nine counts of sexual exploitation of a child based on photographs seized in a search of his photography studio and on photographs appearing on his

O’Connor, C.J. {¶ 1} Herman A. Carson, counsel for defendant Roscoe Campbell, has filed an affidavit with the clerk of this court under R.C. 2701.03 seeking to disqualify Judge Brett M. Spencer from the above-captioned case, now pending for resentencing. {¶ 2} Carson claims that in 2005, Judge Spencer recused himself from a case involving defendant Campbell due to a “professional conflict.” Carson states