Cases

Appellate Case: 22-3286 Document: 105-1 Date Filed: 11/12/2024 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 12, 2024

USCA11 Case: 20-14341 Date Filed: 11/22/2021 Page: 1 of 39 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 20-14341 ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CLARE THERESE GRADY, CARMEN

Blackburne-Rigsby, Chief Judge: Following a jury trial, appellant Sean Grady was convicted of carrying a pistol without a license ("CPWL") and unlawful possession of a controlled substance (marijuana). 1 These charges stem from a police stop in Northwest Washington, D.C., where appellant had dropped a gun in t

[Cite as State v. Grady, 2025-Ohio-2734.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-L-089 Plaintiff-Appellee Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas DARRAL LOVELL GRADY,

Petition granted by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge ERVIN and Judge MURNAGHAN joined. OPINION WILKINSON, Circuit Judge: This case involves the statutory obligations of the United States to deal fairly with the recipients of funds under federal grant programs. Specifically, the question is whether the United States Department of Education can wit

Justice NEWBY dissenting. The Supreme Court of the United States held that the North Carolina statutory scheme for satellite-based monitoring (SBM) of a limited class of sex offenders effected a Fourth Amendment search and remanded this case for consideration of whether the search was reasonable. As the Supreme Court stated, "The reasonableness of a search depends on the totality of the circumstances, including the nature and pur

CALABRIA, Judge. *664Torrey Grady ("defendant") appeals from the trial court's order determining that satellite-based monitoring ("SBM") of defendant is a *665reasonable search under the Fourth Amendment. After careful review, we conclude that the State fa

[J-82-2016] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT; : No. 46 MAP 2015 PANTHER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT; : THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF : Appeal from the Order of the LANCASTER; GREATER JOHNSTOWN : Commonwealth Court entered on April SCHOOL DISTRICT; WILKES-BARRE : 21

OPINION OF THE COURT BY POLLACK, J. This case concerns a negligence action against the State of Hawaii and the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation (collectively, the “State”) involving a rockfall and related ear accident on a state highway. The Circuit Court of the Third Circuit (the “circuit court”) determined that, although the State breache

***FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER*** Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAP-14-0001363 27-SEP-2017 08:21 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE

,~uise Pearson Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals § Ex.Parte Shane T. O'Grady P.O. Box 12.:308 § RE: Cause No. 58863 capitol Station § 412th Judicial Court Austin, Texas 78711 § § Dear Clerk, at this time I find it necessary to request your assistance to the following. ·Now comes Shane T. O'Grady in Cause No. 58863

ORDER MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 21). Plaintiff has filed a memorandum in opposition (Doc. 24), and Defendants have filed their reply (Doc. 25). This matter is now ripe for review. I. BACKGROUND On May 19, 2011, Plaintiff Karen Smith (“Plaintiff’) filed a Complaint agains

393 F.3d 1158 ZUNI PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 89; Gallup-Mckinley County Public School District No. 1, Petitioners,v.UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Respondent.New Mexico State Department of Education, Intervenor. No. 01-9541. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. December 30, 2004. Ronald J. V

Case: 17-14525 Date Filed: 10/21/2019 Page: 1 of 48 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-14525 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:15-cv-00840-MSS-TBM ROSEANN MICHELLE GIL

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Harry D. Leinenweber, Judge, United States District Court For several years, Plaintiff Donald Grady (“Grady”) served as Chief of Police and Public Safety at Northern Illinois University (hereinafter, “NIU” or the “University”). In 2013, Grady was fired in the wake of a scandal arising out of the NIU Police Department’s alleged mishandling of a criminal sexual assault

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0586 Filed April 22, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MATTHEW JAMES GRADY JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Douglas F. Staskal, Judge. Matthew Grady Jr. appeals his judgment and sentence for first-degree murder. AFFIRMED.

325 S.W.3d 333 (2010) Cedric GRADY, Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Appellee. No. 2009-SC-000205-MR. Supreme Court of Kentucky. November 18, 2010. *338 Samuel N. Potter, Department of Public Advocacy, Assistant Public Advocate, Frankfort, KY, Counsel for Appellant. Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky, Christi

KENNEY, J. Appellant, Grady Management, Inc. (“Grady Management”), appeals an order of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Jesse Epps (“Mr. Epps”). It presents one question 1 for our review which we rephrase as follows: </

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: Contender Farms, L.L.P. and Mike McGartland appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”). McGartland owns Contender Farms,- and each actively participates in the Tennessee walking horse industry by buying, selling, and exhibiting horses. They challenge a USDA regulation (the “Regulation”) promulgated under the Horse P

Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Linda Ortega was a tenured teacher in the Chicago Public School (“CPS”) system. She taught fifth grade at Hedges Elementary until the principal of that school terminated her after determining she no longer met the requirements for her position. Ortega brought this lawsuit alleging intentional