Cases

Rosenberry, J. The only contention made by the defendant upon this appeal is that the plaintiff in accepting from the Pabst Brewing Company the order for 36,000 gross of bottles, after Knox, the defendant’s general sales agent for Wisconsin, had been notified that the defendant’s factory output was practically sold, and Knox had been directed to discontinue soliciting orders, was such gross negligence and gross misconduct as to

682 S.W.2d 96 (1984) Selma KOENIG, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joseph J. BABKA, M.D., Defendant-Appellant. No. 47508. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One. October 30, 1984. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied December 5, 1984. Application to Transfer Denied January 15, 1985. *

687 N.W.2d 652 (2004) Sara THORSON, Appellant, v. BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION, Respondent. No. A04-404. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. October 19, 2004. *654 Anne M. Radolinski, Wade S. Davis, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondent. Considered and decided by PETERSON, Presiding Judge; STONE

750 P.2d 1105 (1988) 106 N.M. 779 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Brenda GRAHAM, Individually and as Next Friend of Patches R. Graham, a minor, Defendant-Appellee. No. 16943. Supreme Court of New Mexico. March 2, 1988. Farlow, Simone, Roberts & Weiss, LeRoi Farlow, Norman Weiss, Albuquerque, for plaintiff-appellant.

410 Pa. Superior Ct. 267 (1991) 599 A.2d 984 Richard Lewis GRAHAM and Paulette Graham, H/W, Appellants, v. MACHINERY DISTRIBUTION, INC. t/a and d/b/a Mitsubishi and Nippon Yusoki Co., Ltd. t/a and d/b/a Mitsubishi and Omni Lift, Inc., Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 18, 1991. Filed October 28, 1991. Reargument Deni

SPAETH, Judge: These are consolidated appeals from orders sustaining appellee Boilermakers Local Lodge No. 5’s preliminary objections and dismissing appellants’ complaints for lack of jurisdiction, and also, in the alternative, on the ground of forum non conveniens. Accepting as true, for the purposes of this inquiry, all well-pleaded facts, Frisch v. Alexson Equip. Corp., 423 Pa. 247, 224 A

ORDER LOZANO, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Class Certification filed by the plaintiffs, Paul Graham and Estelle Sanders (hereafter Graham and Sanders) on May 25, 1988, a Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants, Western Loan Marketing Association (hereafter WLMA holder) and California Student Loan Finance Corporation (hereafter CSLFC holder), on March 1,1988 and May 24, 198

PER CURIAM: Paul Samuel Perveler, serving a life sentence in California state prison, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Perveler argues the California Board of Prison Terms’ decision to rescind his parole date violated due process. We affirm. I In 1969, Perveler was convict

Nash, J. The important question to be decided in this case arises under the homestead act of April 9, 1869 (66 Ohio Laws, 48). The debt upon which Wildermuth obtained his judgment was contracted after the enactment of this law. The judgment became a lien upon a certain parcel of real estate belonging to the defendant in error' upon the first day of the October (1877) term of the common pleas court. The real estate was' not used a

562 F.Supp. 449 (1983) OMNI EXPLORATION, INC. v. GRAHAM ENGINEERING CORPORATION, a/k/a Graham Production Company, Inc. and Blocker Drilling Company, Inc. Civ. A. No. 82-5002. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 27, 1983. *450 Francis P. Devine, III, Thomas J. Rueter, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff. Fra

YOUNG, District Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION WITH ORDER ATTACHED Petitioner Wayne Graham moves pro se for a reduction of sentence, citing 5 V.I.C. § 3711 (Suspension of sentence and probation) as the statute governing his request. He seeks a reduction for the reason, in essence, that he has fulfilled the hope of the Judge that the time now spent in prison has helped him to sort out his morals. He is ei

Action for personal injuries resulting from collision of an automobile, driven by plaintiff, with the train of defendant at a public street crossing in the town of Irondale. The case was here on former appeal. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Graham, 218 Ala. 624, 119 So. 654. The second trial, like the first, was had on count B of the complaint, charging wantonness. That the evidence made a case for the j

This case was tried on count B, charging wantonness. Appellant complains that it was due the affirmative charge. The evidence tended to show that the accident occurred about 12:15 p. m., Sunday, at a public crossing in Irondale, a populous location; that at this point several tracks extend through the town, dividing the business and residential sections; that the engineer and firemen in charge of the train were familiar with the conditions; that at this time of day on Sunday much traffic cros

It is unquestionably settled by the decisions of this court, that, notwithstanding the wife must sue for personal injuries to herself, the husband may maintain an action for compensatory damages, not for the injury, but resulting therefrom, such as the loss of her services or society, the cost of nursing and caring for her, etc. People's Home Tel. Co. v. Cockrum,182 Ala. 549, 62 So. 86; Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. Lintner

Action to recover damages for injuries suffered by plaintiff, a window cleaner, by reason of a ladder furnished by the defendant slipping and falling while plaintiff was on it, engaged in cleaning windows inside of a school auditorium. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s proof on liability reversed on the law-and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Under the proof a jury question was presented as to whether or n

192 Kan. 558 (1964) 389 P.2d 750 BETTY ANN GRAHAM, As Widow of James Mathew Graham, Now Deceased, Appellee, v. LOPER ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., A Corporation, Appellant, and I.D. BARBER, a/k/a PETE BARBER, Defendant. No. 43,484 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed March 7, 1964. Robert L. Howard, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Geo

Ethridge, J., specially concurring: I concur with the basis assigned in the controlling opinion for reversing the action of the circuit court. However, I think that an equally important and substantial reason why the order below was erroneous is that, under the ownership-in-place theory long ago adopted by Mississippi, an oil, gas and mineral lessee owns a present possessory estate in the surface as well as

In Division Two. SHEEWOOD, P. J. — 1. This case had its origin in these circumstances: Section 34, article 6 of the Constitution of 1875, declares that: “The General Assembly shall establish in every county a probate court, which shall be a court of record, and consist of one judge, who shall be elected,” etc.: which section concludes with this proviso: “That until the

The conviction was under article 359 of the Penal Code for the giving of a false certificate by a county clerk. The punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years. The record shows two orders in reference to change of venue, first from Uvalde county to Kendall county, and from Kendall county to Medina county. It is alleged in the indictment that the appellant was clerk of the county court of Uvalde county and did unlawfully and wilfully give to Mrs. H. C. K

Sherwood, C. J. The words “ grant,” “ bargain,” “ sell,” when employed in a conveyance, are only to be construed as a statutory covenant of warranty against “incumbrances done or suffered by the grantor, or any person claiming under him,” and do not extend to outstanding incumbrances over which the grantor in the given conveyance has no control. Armstrong v. Darby, 26 Mo. 517; Clore v. Graham, 64 Mo. 249. For th