⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Grandy v. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and”

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994-05-02 · Published · cited 26× · 17 F.3d 1463; 305 U.S. App. D.C. 110; 1994 WL 71984
*1464Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge SENTELLE. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge MIKVA. STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge: Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great Oregon and a number of other organizations (collectively referred to
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-03-22 · Published · cited 20× · 919 F.3d 298
GREGG COSTA, Circuit Judge: *301 A district court found that the boundaries for Mississippi State Senate District 22 dilute African-American voting strength and prevent those citizens from having the equal opportunity "to participate in the political process and to elect representatives of
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 8× · 316 F.R.D. 117; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106162; 2016 WL 4257351
MEMORANDUM OPINION James A. Wynn, Jr., United States Circuit Judge Circuit Judge James A. Wynn, Jr., wrote the opinion, in which District Judge Thomas D. Schroeder and District Judge Catherine C. Eagles joined: More than two decades ago, the Supreme Court considered a legal challenge to election districts that assigned voters to districts primarily on the basis of race. Shaw v. Reno (Shaw
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 19-60133 Document: 00514887045 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/25/2019 REVISED March 25, 2019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ___________________ FILED March 22, 2019
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011-07-27 · Published · cited 19× · 653 F.3d 496; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15402; 2011 WL 3132278
653 F.3d 496 (2011) KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. and Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Russell E. KOELLER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-2333. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued September 29, 2010. Decided July 27, 2011. *498 Paul M. Brown (argued), Attorney,
United States Court of International Trade · 1995-12-29 · Published · cited 17× · 913 F. Supp. 559; 19 Ct. Int'l Trade 1461; 19 C.I.T. 1461; 42 ERC (BNA) 1196; 17 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2534; 1995 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 266
913 F.Supp. 559 (1995) EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE, a California Nonprofit Corporation; Todd Steiner; The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, a New York Nonprofit Corporation; and The Humane Society of the United States, a Delaware Nonprofit Corporation, The Sierra Club, a California Nonprofit Corporation; and The Georgia Fishermen's Association, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Warren CHRISTOPHER, Secretary of State;
Cano v. Davispublic domain
District Court, C.D. California · 2002-06-12 · Published · cited 12× · 211 F. Supp. 2d 1208; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12102; 2002 WL 1379937
211 F.Supp.2d 1208 (2002) Maria CANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Gray DAVIS, et al., Defendants. No. CV 01-08477 MMM (RCx). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 12, 2002. *1209 *1210 *1211 Vibiana Andrade, Thomas A. Saenz, Antonia Hernandez, Stev
District Court, D. Nebraska · 2007-01-19 · Published · cited 34× · 240 F.R.D. 456; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4172; 2007 WL 172482
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KOPF, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NECivR 72.3, all parties have filed objections (filings 93 & 96) from the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (filing 90), which recommends, among other things, that I deny Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel (filing 11) and grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (filing 70)
Texas Supreme Court · 1997-10-09 · Published · cited 238× · 952 S.W.2d 454
952 S.W.2d 454 (1997) TEXAS BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION FOUNDATION, INC., Appellant, v. Eddie LEWELLEN, Jack F. Witten, Elliott Hayes, Scott Allison, Chris Lewellen, Randy Falkenberg, Ricky Biggs, Charles Burrus, Kevin Igo, and Mark K. Gunter, Appellees. TEXAS BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION FOUNDATION, INC., Appellant, v. Jack ABBOTT d/b/a Arroyo Farms, et al., Appellees. Nos. 96-0745, 96-0839. Suprem