⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gray v. Carr and Carr Law Firm”

Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
-. JOANNA STATON District Clerk BELL COUNTY, TEXAS BELL COUNTY JUSTICE COMPLEX 1201 Huey Road • P. 0. Box 909 • Belton, Texas 76513 (254) 933-5197 • Fax (254) 933-5199 Joanna
State v. Carrpublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 2014-07-25 · Published · cited 125× · 300 Kan. 1; 331 P.3d 544; 2014 WL 3681049; 2014 Kan. LEXIS 432
The opinion of the court was delivered by Per Curiam,: Defendant Reginald Dexter Carr, Jr., and his brother, Jonathan D. Carr, were jointly charged, convicted, and sentenced for crimes committed in a series of three incidents in December 2000 in Wichita. This is R. Carr’s direct appeal from his 50 convictions and 4 death sentences. In the first incident on December 7 and 8, Andrew S
Carr v. Moorepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE JAMES MARCUS CARR and wife, ) MARY GENE CAMPBELL CARR,) FILED ) Petitioners/Appellants, ) Appeal No. July 20, 1999 ) 01A01-9807-CH-00402 Cecil Crowson, Jr. v. ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Sumner County Chanc
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009-03-17 · Published · cited 5× · 416 B.R. 239; 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 979; 2009 WL 903258
416 B.R. 239 (2009) In re CARR & PORTER, LLC, Debtor. Tom C. Smith, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Plaintiff, v. J. Ridgely Porter, III, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 07-70238-SCS. Adversary No. 08-07051-SCS. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. March 17, 2009. *242 Robert V. Roussos, Roussos, Lassiter, G
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001-05-09 · Published · cited 6× · 786 So. 2d 230; 2001 WL 487328
786 So.2d 230 (2001) Michael Ray CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OAKE TREE APARTMENTS and Cross Country Management, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. No. 34,539-CA. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit. May 9, 2001. *232 Osborne, McComiskey & Diaz by Daria B. Diaz, Counsel for Appellant. The Smitherman Law Firm by W.
Carr v. Statepublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 819 S.W.2d 84; 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1723; 1991 WL 237897
CROW, Judge. Rodney Carr (“movant”) appeals from an order denying his pro se motion under Rule 29.15, Missouri Rules of Criminal Procedure (19th ed. 1988), to vacate his conviction of capital murder and sentence to life imprisonment without eligibility for parole for 50 years. The conviction resulted from trial by jury; the sentence was assessed by the judge because the jury was unable to agree on punishment. The judgment wa
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003-02-21 · Published · cited 61× · 866 So. 2d 519; 2003 WL 376080
866 So.2d 519 (2003) Ex parte DILL, DILL, CARR, STONBRAKER & HUTCHINGS, P.C., and Fay Matsukage. (In re Allen Austin et al. v. Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C., et al. Mary Champion et al. v. Dill, Dill, Carr, Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C., et al.). 1011586. Supreme Court of Alabama. February 21, 2003. Rehearing Denied May 30, 2003.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984-10-12 · Published · cited 20× · 483 A.2d 542; 334 Pa. Super. 459; 1984 Pa. Super. LEXIS 6373
WIEAND, Judge, dissenting: I agree with the majority that it is not a good law which permits employees to carry unlicensed firearms at their “fixed place[s] of business.” I disagree, however, that this is adequate reason to rewrite a criminal statute duly enacted by the legislature. Thus, my dissent. Albert Carr was tried on various criminal charges in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia but w
Kelley v. Carrpublic domain
District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1983-06-14 · Published · cited 53× · 567 F. Supp. 831; 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16254
567 F.Supp. 831 (1983) Frank J. KELLEY and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Plaintiffs, v. James A. CARR and Charles P. LeMieux, III, dba Lloyd Carr & Co., a partnership, James A. Carr and Charles P. LeMieux, III, dba Lloyd Carr Financial Co., a partnership, James A. Carr, a/k/a Alan Abrahams, Charles P. LeMieux, III, Defendants. No. G77-550 C.A. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2014-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 14-14-01021-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 14-14-01021-CV 12/29/2014 10:03:31 PM
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007-07-02 · Published · cited 0×
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 05-4397 JOSHUA BRENT GRAY, Defendant-Appellant.  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  No. 05-4398 TERRENCE A. ASKEW
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014-09-08 · Published · cited 59× · 766 F.3d 98; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17345; 2014 WL 4402213
SELYA, Circuit Judge. This is one of the relatively rare occasions on which we have been asked, in a non-class-action setting, to visit the precincts patrolled by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p. Specifically, we are tasked with determining whether a particular collection letter satisfies section 1692g(b) of the FDCPA, which requires that a debt collector’s collection activities and comm
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956-09-24 · Published · cited 5× · 386 Pa. 196; 125 A.2d 607; 1956 Pa. LEXIS 391
Opinion by Mr. Justice Bell, The plaintiff, a minority stockholder of Carr O’Brien Company, stock brokers, filed a complaint to prevent the majority stockholders and the officers and directors from fraudulently converting the business to their own use and to the use of a new corporation known as Joseph L. O’Brien Company. He prayed for (1) an injunction restraining defendants from transacting business under the
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2022-11-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00055-CV ___________________________ SETH BOOKOUT, LESLYE ROMERO, AND RYAN GALLAGHER, Appellants V. JONATHAN SHELLEY AND STEDFAST BAPTIST CHURCH, Appellees On Appeal from the 141st District Court
United States Customs Court · 1971-04-29 · Published · cited 1× · 66 Cust. Ct. 316; 326 F. Supp. 973; 1971 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2359
Bao, Chief Judge: The substantive issue in this case involves the classification of hub castings, imported from Canada. However, a preliminary issue is raised by the following state of facts: It appears from the official papers, which are in evidence, that this merchandise was appraised as entered on March 28, 1968 and was liquidated as entered on April 12, 1968. The protest was filed on April 30, 1968, claim
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2021-05-03 · Published · cited 2× · 858 S.E.2d 52; 311 Ga. 407
311 Ga. 407 FINAL COPY S21A0324, S21Z0325. THE STATE v. THOMAS; and vice versa. NAHMIAS, Presiding Justice. Tyler Thomas was convicted of malice murder and a firearm crime in connection with the fatal shooting of Ashley Brown during a planned drug deal. The trial court granted Thomas’s motion for new trial, however, ruling that the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (83 SCt 1194, 10 LE2d 215) (1963), by failing to disclose a deal between the State and its witnes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006-10-12 · Published · cited 4× · 36 A.D.3d 34; 822 N.Y.S.2d 871
OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident *35and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration state
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2018-10-09 · Published · cited 0× · 304 Ga. 524
304 Ga. 524 FINAL COPY S18A0851, S18X0852. THE STATE v. HOLMES; and vice versa. BENHAM, Justice. In June 2015, cross-appellant Quantravious Antwan Holmes was convicted of malice murder and other offenses arising out of the shooting death of his friend Todd Burkes.1 The trial court granted Holmes’ motion for new trial on two grounds: on the ground that the court had erred by denying Holmes 1 The crimes occurred on October 22, 2013. On March 11, 2014
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2024-06-28 · Published · cited 0×
AFFIRM in part; REVERSE in part; and REMAND and Opinion Filed June 28, 2024 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00454-CV SHACKELFORD, BOWEN, MCKINLEY & NORTON, LLP, CARSON EPES STEINBAUER, WHITLEY PENN, LLP, AND ROBERT METZ, Appellants V. IRINA PETERS AND NICK PETERS, Appe
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-09-23 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: August 29, 2022 ************************* HOANG-HOA NGUYEN, as Special * PUBLISHED Administrator for the Estate of * TUYET MAI, * * Petitioner, * No. 17-2051V * v.