⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gray v. Evans Law Associates, P.C.”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014-05-21 · Published · cited 20× · 158 So. 3d 633; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7815; 2014 WL 2109130
ORFINGER, J. G.P., the adoptive mother, appeals an order vacating a final judgment of adop*636tion, effectively terminating the parent-child relationship with her five-year-old child, D.P.P. The trial court set aside the final judgment concluding that it was rendered without subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse, holding the circuit court had subject matter jurisdic
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023-08-28 · Published · cited 53× · 78 F.4th 532
21-3127-cv (L) Kyros Law P.C. v. World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 Nos. 21-3127-cv (L), 21-3136-cv (XAP) KYROS LAW P.C., KONSTANTINE W. KYROS, Appellants-Cross-Appellees, MICHELLE JAMES, as mother and next friend of M.O., a minor child, and T.O, a minor child,
Wyoming Supreme Court · 2020-01-08 · Published · cited 38× · 455 P.3d 1201; 2020 WY 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2020 WY 3 OCTOBER TERM, A.D. 2019 January 8, 2020 GERALD E. GOWDY, beneficiary of the Marian Louise Jackson Living Trust, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. S-19-0005 DENNIS C. COOK, CRAIG C. COOK and COOK AND ASSOCIATES, P.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013-06-28 · Published · cited 6× · 955 F. Supp. 2d 528; 28 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 695; 2013 WL 3288309; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91131
ORDER W. EARL BRITT, Senior District Judge. This matter is before the court on the 23 January 2013 motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Law Enforcement Associates Corporation (“LEA”), Anthony Rand (“Rand”), James J. Lindsay (“Lindsay”), Joseph A. Jordan (“Jordan”) and Paul Briggs (“Briggs”).1 (DE # 92.) Also before the court is the 11 February 2013 motion
Arizona Supreme Court · 2006-07-18 · Published · cited 22× · 138 P.3d 723; 213 Ariz. 24; 482 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3; 2006 Ariz. LEXIS 97
OPINION HURWITZ, Justice. ¶ 1 Ethical Rule (“ER”) 5.6(a) of the Arizona Rules of Professional Conduct prohibits an “agreement that restricts the right of a lawyer to practice [law] after termination of [a law firm] relationship.” Ariz. R. Sup.Ct. 42 (2006). This case involves the application of ER 5.6(a) to & shareholder agreement requiring a departing lawyer to tender his stock to a profession
District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1998-01-26 · Published · cited 16× · 984 F. Supp. 1404; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 737; 1998 WL 31781
984 F.Supp. 1404 (1998) SUMMIT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Fob JAMES, Jr., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 97-T-1149-N. United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division. January 26, 1998. *1405 *1406 *1407
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-08-20 · Published · cited 0×
08/20/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 16, 2018 Session KRISTIN MCKENZIE ET AL. v. WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICES ‒ CHATTANOOGA, P.C. ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 14C539 L. Marie Williams, Judge
People v. Graypublic domain
California Supreme Court · 2023-08-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DONTRAE RENAY GRAY, Defendant and Appellant. S269237 Second Appellate District, Division Two B302236 Los Angeles County Superior Court MA065662 August 14, 2023
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011-10-07 · Published · cited 36× · 2011 OK 81; 264 P.3d 1190; 2011 WL 4552459
264 P.3d 1190 (2011) 2011 OK 81 EVANS & ASSOCIATES UTILITY SERVICES, and Zurich American Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. Ruben ESPINOSA and The Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents. No. 108,017. Supreme Court of Oklahoma. October 4, 2011. As Corrected October 7, 2011. *1192 Timo
Webster v. Graypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022-07-08 · Published · cited 9× · 39 F.4th 27
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1002 STEVEN WEBSTER, Petitioner, Appellant, v. DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Respondent, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. F. Dennis Saylor, IV, U.S. District Judge]
Butterfield v. Graypublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021-10-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-523 No. COA20-218 Filed 5 October 2021 Wilson County, No. 17 CVS 1579 CONNIE BUTTERFIELD and TRACIE CAVENESS as Co-Administrators of the ESTATE OF TODD L. CAVENESS, Plaintiffs, v. HAYLEE GRAY, RN, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., VICKIE SHAW, R.T. ADCOCK, SHERIFF CALVI
Butterfield v. Graypublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021-10-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA 2021-NCCOA-523 No. COA20-218 Filed 5 October 2021 Wilson County, No. 17 CVS 1579 CONNIE BUTTERFIELD and TRACIE CAVENESS as Co-Administrators of the ESTATE OF TODD L. CAVENESS, Plaintiffs, v. HAYLEE GRAY, RN, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC., VICKIE SHAW, R.T. ADCOCK, SHERIFF CALVI
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 1064
THOMAS, Judge. Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C. ("the firm"), appeals a judgment of the Etowah Circuit Court ("the trial court") denying its request for an award of attorney fees for its representation of Jason DuBois. We affirm. Background In August 2011, DuBois was working on a railroad crew that was traveling from Virginia to Maryland and was forced to jump from a
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017-07-14 · Published · cited 0× · 266 So. 3d 1064
THOMAS, Judge. Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick, Morrison & Norwood, P.C. ("the firm"), appeals a judgment of the Etowah Circuit Court ("the trial court") denying its request for an award of attorney fees for its representation of Jason DuBois. We affirm. Background In August 2011, DuBois was working on a railroad crew that was traveling from Virginia to Maryland and was forced to jump from a
Gray v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Georgia · 2020-10-19 · Published · cited 19× · 850 S.E.2d 36; 310 Ga. 259
310 Ga. 259 FINAL COPY S20G0192. GRAY v. THE STATE. MCMILLIAN, Justice. We granted a petition for writ of certiorari to determine whether a trial court has jurisdiction to modify a sentence outside the one-year period after a sentence is imposed, as authorized under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), when the motion to modify is filed within the one-year period. The Court of Appeals held in Gray v. State, 351 Ga. App. 703 (832 SE2d 857) (2019) that trial courts lack jurisdic
Gray v. Binderpublic domain
Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 805 S.E.2d 768
OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE DONALD W. LEMONS In this appeal, we consider whether a potential beneficiary under a will may collaterally attack the distribution of the decedent's estate by challenging the subject matter jurisdiction of the commissioner of accounts who, without a referral from the circuit court, gave aid and guidance in the interpretation of the decedent's will and the determination of his heirs. Additionally
Evans v. Evanspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011-04-26 · Published · cited 52× · 75 So. 3d 1083; 2011 WL 1566017
MAXWELL, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. The Washington County Chancery Court granted Robert Evans a downward modification of his child-support payments but ordered him to pay an amount greater than required by the child-support guidelines. While the chancellor’s deviation from these presumptively correct guidelines may be reasonable, his findings of fact are inadequate to support the reduction. Further, because R
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016-08-11 · Published · cited 0× · 144 A.3d 1141; 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 304
THOMPSON, Associate Judge: On October 8, 2013, Tyrone Jones and Gordon Carpenter were arrested in connection with a narcotics buy/bust operation. Mr. Jones filed (and Mr. Carpenter joined) a motion to suppress tangible evidence, which was denied. A jury thereafter convicted each of them of one count of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance (heroin), having heard an u
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
District Court, S.D. New York · 2007-09-14 · Published · cited 1× · 508 F. Supp. 2d 278; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68408
OPINION CHIN, District Judge. Since 1896, x-ray technology has enabled doctors to “see” inside patients’ bodies without the risks of surgery. More recently, physicians have employed other imaging technologies, including Magnetic Resonance Imaging (“MRI”), to examine patients’ brains, muscles, and organs without a scalpel or the risks of anesthesia and infection. X-ray and MRI