Cases

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49666 CARLA ANN GRAY, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Boise, August 2022 Term v. ) ) Opinion filed: October 18, 2022 BRYAN DAVID GRAY,

Affirmed.

DONALDSON, Judge. Jeshua David Gray (“the husband”) appeals from an order denying a motion filed pursuant to Rule 55(c), Ala. R. Civ. P., to set aside a default judgment entered by the Dale Circuit Court (“the trial court”) divorcing him from Brandy Ann Gray (“the wife”), granting sole legal and physical custody of the parties’ two children to the wife, ordering the husband to pay alimony and child support, and dividing the

Affirmed.

Affirmed

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 49666 CARLA ANN GRAY, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) Boise, August 2022 Term v. ) ) Opinion filed: October 18, 2022 BRYAN DAVID GRAY,

In re Nelson Sr., Otha Curtis; — Other; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Helena, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 19121; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2013 CA 1953. Denied.

In re Gray, James; — Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Helena, 21st Judicial District Court Div. B, No. 19121; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2011 CA 2360. Denied.

[Cite as Gray v. Gray, 2012-Ohio-5180.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98257 ZACHARY T. GRAY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.

THOMAS, Judge. Kenneth Eugene Gray (“the father”) and Jenifer Lee Gray (“the mother”) were married in Florida in January 2009. They moved to Alabama in January 2010. On July 25, 2010, the mother left the marital residence and relocated to Michigan; she was pregnant with the parties’ child. The father filed an action in the Tallapoosa Circuit Court (“the Alabama trial court”) seeking a divorce from the mother on September 3, 20

PER CURIAM. The appellant, former husband, challenges a final judgment and supplemental final judgment of dissolution of marriage awarding the former wife permanent periodic alimony in the amount of $30,000 per month. The former husband asserts that the trial court erred by failing to make adequate findings to support the former wife’s need for or the former husband’s ability to pay that amount, and that the trial court er

ORDER PER CURIAM. Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a court-tried case. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. H

In re Gray, Christy Lynn Winnon; Defendant; Applying For Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Morehouse, 4th Judicial District Court Div. C, No. 2005-*1239370; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 45,826-CA. Granted. CLARK, J., recused.

27 A.3d 1102 (2011) 131 Conn.App. 404 Sabele GRAY v. Richard E. GRAY. Nos. 30512, 31700. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued May 25, 2011. Decided September 13, 2011. *1103 Richard E. Gray, Sr., pro se, the appellant (defendant). Bourke G. Spellacy, with whom, on the brief, was D

953 N.E.2d 680 (2011) GRAY v. GRAY. No. 33A05-1102-DR-89. Court of Appeals of Indiana. September 8, 2011. VAIDIK, J. Disposition of Case by Unpublished Memorandum Decision Affirmed in part and Reversed in part. KIRSCH, J., concurs. MATHIAS, J., concurs.

GUIDRY, Justice.* bin this relocation and custody modification matter, we are called upon to determine whether the trial court or the court of appeal on rehearing correctly applied the criteria governing relocations, La.Rev. Stat. 9:355.1 et seq., to the domiciliary parent’s request to relocate from Alabama to Kansas, and also correctly applied Bergeron v. Bergeron, 492 So.2d

[Cite as Gray v. Gray, 2011-Ohio-4091.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95532 MARCY L. GRAY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents. hi respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in the original opinion, in addition to the following remarks in response to the creative legal reasoning displayed in the majority opinion. Despite the asserted strict adherence to Bergeron, the majority ignores the second part of the heavy burden standard, which provides for a change in custody after a consid

694 S.E.2d 523 (2010) GRAY v. GRAY. No. COA09-1687. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed May 18, 2010. Certification Date June 7, 2010. Case Reported Without Published Opinion Dismissed.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, J.), entered January 5, 2007 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order, among other things, denied respondent’s objections to an order of the Support Magistrate dated November 15, 2006 dismissing respondent’s petition. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Mem