Cases

639 F.Supp.2d 818 (2009) Barry WHITTAKER, Petitioner, v. Blaine LAFLER, Respondent. No. 06-15679. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 25, 2009. *821 Barry Whittaker, Grayling, MI, pro se. Heather S. Meingast, Department of Attorney General, Lansing, MI, for Respondent. OR

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0249p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT SHEILA ARMSTRONG, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellant, │ │

If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GAVRILIDES MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC, FOR PUBLICATION GAVRILIDES PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, February 1, 2022 and GAVRILIDES MANAGEMENT

This is a bill filed in aid of execution. Most of the facts and circumstances out of which the suit arises are reported inComstock v. Horton, 235 Mich. 282. Subsequent to taking the decree in that case, which fixed Mr. Comstock's liability in the *Page 157 amount of $5,540.17, the plaintiff herein caused successive executions to be issued by means of which partial satisfaction of the decree was obtained

195 Ga. App. 422 (1990) 394 S.E.2d 112 WILLIAMS v. THE STATE. A90A0758. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided April 19, 1990. Hugh J. McCullough, for appellant. Dupont K. Cheney, District Attorney, J. Stephen Archer, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. DEEN, Presiding Judge. Grayling C. Williams was co

41 F.Supp.2d 736 (1998) NORTH AMERICAN NATURAL RESOURCES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMM'N, et al., Defendants. Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership, Plaintiffs, v. Michigan Public Service Comm'n, et al., Defendants. Michigan Power Limited Partnership and ADA Cogeneration Limited Partnership, Plaintiff, v. Michigan Public Service Comm'n, et al., Defendants. Central Wayne Energy Re

OAKES, Chief Judge: Joseph Candito was convicted by a jury in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut on January 26, 1989, for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846 (1982), and for possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine within one thousand feet of a public elementa

OPINION HILLMAN, District Judge. This matter involves an alleged breach of a Red Roof Inn franchise agreement. Before the Court are three motions: plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment, defendants’ motion to amend or correct their opposition to summary judgment, and defendants’ motion to strike plaintiffs affidavit. For the reasons explained below, the motion for partial summary judgment will be

OPINION MATTHEWS, Senior Justice. I. INTRODUCTION Challenged in this case are land and water use permits allowing intensive mineral exploration on State land. The main question we address is whether the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) had to give public notice before issuing the permits. Because the Alaska Constitution requires public notice when interests in land are transferred, the answer

852 F.Supp. 1150 (1994) UNITED STATES of America, v. Robert J. GEHL, George Jackson, Tempotech Industries, Inc., and Gehl Productions, Inc., Defendants. No. 93-CR-300. United States District Court, N.D. New York. May 13, 1994. *1151 Gary L. Sharpe, U.S. Atty., Syracuse, NY, for the U.S. Bond Schoeneck & King, George H.

474 F.Supp. 622 (1979) Bernice PIATCHEK, Plaintiff, v. FAIRVIEW RELIABLE LOAN, INC., Defendant. Civ. Nos. 77-4377, 78-4059. United States District Court, S. D. Illinois. June 20, 1979. *623 Jack VerSteegh, Land of Lincoln Legal Assistance Foundation, Inc., East St. Louis, Ill., for plaintiff. Frank Susman and J. Leonard Sc

TINDER, Circuit Judge. This consolidated case comes to us on appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgments in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, John W. Costello, Litigation Trustee under the Comdisco Litigation Trust, and against defendants-appellants in an action to enforce certain promissory notes. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and vacate in part the grants of summary judgment in favor of the

625 F.3d 342 (2010) John W. COSTELLO, not individually, but as Litigation Trustee Under the Comdisco Litigation Trust, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven R. GRUNDON, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 08-3961, 08-3966, 08-3967, 08-3981, 08-3988, 08-3989, 08-3990, 10-1043, 10-1045, 10-1046, 10-1049, 10-1056, 10-1058, 10-1059. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued A

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 275 Plaintiffs, William and Halleck Warren, filed a small claims action against defendants, James and Margaret Darnell, in the circuit court of Clinton County to recover monies allegedly owed by defendants under a contract for the sale of a membership in Hickory Shores Resort. Defendant Margaret Darnell denied t

CONTIE, Circuit Judge. Selden Apartment Associates (Selden) appeals the dismissal of its claims brought under section 16 of the Civil Rights Act of 1870 (42 U.S.C. § 1981) and section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (42 U.S.C. § 1982). Selden also appeals the jury verdict in favor of the United States Department of Urban Development (HUD) in the remain

738 F.Supp. 1098 (1990) John HUSS, Personal Representative of the Estate of Norma J. Davey, Deceased and John Huss, Personal Representative of the Estate of Clarence Davey, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, and the State of Michigan, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. No. K86-81 CA4. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D. April 24, 1990. <

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 369–479 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

257 F.Supp.2d 357 (2003) State of MAINE, Maine Chamber of Commerce, Atlantic Salmon of Maine, LLC, Stolt Sea Farm, Inc., Maine Aquaculture Association, Maine Pulp and Paper Association, Wild Blueberry Commission of Maine, Jasper Wyman & Sons, Cherryfield Foods, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Gale A. NORTON, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior, Steven A. Williams, in his Official Capacity as Director of t

69 F.Supp.2d 1202 (1999) SIERRA CLUB, a non-profit corporation; and Merg (Mariposans for Environmentally Responsible Growth), a non-profit corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Bruce BABBITT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior; Department of the Interior; National Park Service; John Reynolds, in his official capacity as Western Regional Director of the National Park Service; and Stanley Albright, in his official capacity as Superintenden