Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Great American Insur v. Ticor”
Chultem v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.public domain
Illinois Official Reports Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of
Lennar Corp. v. Great American Insurance Co.public domain
200 S.W.3d 651 (2006) LENNAR CORPORATION, Lennar Homes of Texas Land and Construction, Limited, and Lennar Homes of Texas Sales and Marketing, Limited d/b/a Village Builders, Appellants, v. GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, American Dynasty Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Markel American Insurance Company, Gerling America Insurance Company, RLI Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania and Westchester Fire Insurance Compa
Worth v. TAMARACK AMERICAN, DIV. OF GREAT AMERICANpublic domain
47 F.Supp.2d 1087 (1999) John O. WORTH, d/b/a Worth Law Offices, Plaintiff, v. TAMARACK AMERICAN, a Division of Great American Insurance Co., and American National Fire Insurance Co., a subsidiary of Great American Insurance Co., Defendant. No. IP 97-1757 CB/S. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. March 31, 1999.
Star Operations, Inc. and Great American Insurance Company of New York v. Dig Tech, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 03-15-00423-CV 7966631 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUST
Executive Management, Ltd. v. Ticor Title Insurancepublic domain
963 P.2d 465 (1998) EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT, LTD., a California Corporation, Appellant, v. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation; Barbara Marks, an Individual; The Manley Marks and Barbara Marks 1988 Trust, Barbara Marks, Trustee; Marks Plaza, a Nevada Corporation; Palmall Properties, a Nevada Corporation; and Arthur Shipkey, an Individual, Respondents. No. 27991. Supreme Court of Nevada.</
Allison v. Ticor Title Insurancepublic domain
HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr., Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal arises from lawsuits filed by three different groups of plaintiffs against Ticor Title Insurance Company (“Ticor”). Jurisdiction in the district court was based on diversity. Defendant Ticor is a California corporation, and the plaintiffs are all residents of states other than California. Jurisdiction in this court exists as an appeal from final judgment as to all cla
Ticor Title Insurance v. Brownpublic domain
511 U.S. 117 (1994) TICOR TITLE INSURANCE CO. et al. v. BROWN et al. No. 92-1988. United States Supreme Court. Argued March 1, 1994. Decided April 4, 1994. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Richard G. Taranto argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Joel I. Klein, Frank D. Tatum, Jr
Ticor Title Insurance v. Federal Trade Commissionpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge. This case concerning petitioners’ assertions of immunity from the antitrust laws is again before this Court on cross-petitions for review and enforcement of a Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) order after remand by the United States Supreme Court. See FTC v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 2169, 119 L.Ed.2d 410 (1992). The FTC exercised
735 F.Supp. 581 (1990) GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HOUSTON GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 89 Civ. 4422 (PKL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 24, 1990. *582 Orenstein & Brown, New York City (Christopher B. Hitchcock, Eric B. Morrison, of counsel), for plaintiff. Costell
998 F.2d 1129 62 USLW 2050, 1993-2 Trade Cases P 70,296 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Chicago Title InsuranceCompany, Safeco Title Insurance Company (now known asSecurity Union Title Insurance Company), Lawyers TitleInsurance Corporation and Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Petitioners,v.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 89-3787. United Stat
Bushman v. American Title Co.public domain
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 74) GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge. Residential home sellers brought this proposed class action alleging defendants defrauded them and violated the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 445.901 et seq., when they listed real estate transfer taxes on HUD-1 settlement statements that allegedly were not d
Ticor Title Insurance v. Federal Trade Commissionpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT HUTCHINSON, Circuit Judge. Five of the nation’s largest title insurance companies, Ticor Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title Insurance Company, SAFECO Title Insurance Company (now operating under the name Security Union Title Insurance Company), Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation and Stewart Title Guaranty Company (collectively Ticor), petition for review of a final order of th
902 S.W.2d 488 (1993) GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. NORTH AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, Appellee. No. 3-92-182-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin. March 31, 1993. Publication Ordered June 15, 1995. *493 Arthur F. Selander, Quilling, Selander, Cummiskey, Clutts & Lownds, P.C., D
922 F.2d 1122 59 USLW 2433, 1991-1 Trade Cases 69,293 TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Chicago Title InsuranceCompany, SAFECO Title Insurance Company (now known asSecurity Union Title Insurance Company), Lawyers TitleInsurance Corporation and Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Petitioners,v.FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 89-3787. United State
Ross v. American Express Co.public domain
OPINION & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The Plaintiffs’ class actions allege that credit card issuers collusively adopted class-action-barring arbitration clauses in violation of the Sherman Act to prevent cardholders from redressing their injuries collectively through the courts. They seek injunctive relief prohibiting such clauses in cardholder agreements. Following the deni
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: *1243 This appeal involves a complicated property insurance coverage dispute between an insurer and a landlord claiming through its prior tenant, the named insured under the relevant policy. The insurer, Ace American Insurance Company ("Ace"), appeals the judgmen
Burkons v. Ticor Title Ins. Co. of Cal.public domain
168 Ariz. 345 (1991) 813 P.2d 710 Earl M. BURKONS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, Defendant/Appellee. No. CV-90-0292-PR. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. June 18, 1991. Reconsideration Denied August 16, 1991. *346 Jennings,
Great American v. MUD IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, AT AUSTIN NO. 3-92-182-CV GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
979 F.2d 1187 37 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 37 John D. ALLISON, Bayfield Electric Cooperative, Robert E.Cadwell, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.John D. ALLISON, Paul R. Phillips, Mary B. Phillips, et al.,Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.TICOR TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-1893, 91-2025.
Zurich American Insurance v. Public Storagepublic domain
743 F.Supp.2d 525 (2010) ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. PUBLIC STORAGE f/k/a Shurgard Storage Centers Inc., et al., Defendants. No. 1:09cv1394. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. September 16, 2010. *530 William J. Carter, Kelly Marie Lippincott, Carr Maloney PC, Washington, DC, fo