Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Green Box NA Green Bay, LLC”
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN GREAT BAY CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ) ASSOCIATION, INC ) ) Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. ST-18-CV-768
In re Aurora Memory Care, LLCpublic domain
A. Benjamin Goldgar, United States Bankruptcy Judge Before the court for ruling is the motion of creditor West Suburban Bank (the "Bank") to convert or dismiss the chapter 11 case of debtor Aurora Memory Care, LLC ("AMC") under section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 1112(b). For the reasons discussed
Illaraza v. Hovensa LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM BARTLE, District Judge. In these consolidated civil actions, plaintiffs Jose Illaraza (“Jose”) and Luis Illara-za (“Luis”),1 who are brothers, bring claims against defendant HOVENSA, LLC (“HOVENSA”) for wrongful discharge, slander and defamation per se, tortious interference with contractual relationship, abuse of process, malicious prosecution; and
Yellowfin Yachts, Inc. v. Barker Boatworks, LLCpublic domain
ORDER STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Not anchored by a non-competition or a non-solicitation contract, former Yellowfin Yachts executive Kevin Barker left Yellow-fin and founded a competitor, Barker Boatworks. With the aid of nautical architect Michael Peters, Barker designed a twenty-six-foot, center-console bay boat with a “sweeping” or “s” sheer line. Typically co-extensive with a boa
Wachovia Securities, LLC v. Jahelkapublic domain
586 F.Supp.2d 972 (2008) WACHOVIA SECURITIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Andrew A. JAHELKA, Richard O. Nichols, Leon A. Greenblatt III, Banco Panamericano, Inc., Loop Corp., Loop Properties, Inc., and Scattered Corp., Defendants. No. 04 C 3082. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 22, 2008. *977 Adam Bre
Pamela Dunlap v. Community Bank of Lousianapublic domain
Judgment rendered June 5, 2024. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 55,695-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** PAMELA DUNLAP
Timilsina v. West Valley Citypublic domain
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID NUFFER, District Judge. The Report and Recommendation1 issued by United States Magistrate Judge Furse on July 1, 2015 recommends that West Valley City’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment2 be GRANTED and Mr. *1208Timil
Juneau County v. Associated Bank, N.A.public domain
KLOPPENBURG, J. ¶ 1. Associated Bank appeals from an order denying the Bank's motion to vacate a default judgment in favor of Juneau County in its tax lien foreclosure action on two parcels of real property. The Bank argues that the judgment is void, due to the County's failure to strictly comply with the notice re*267quirements of Wis. Stat. § 75.521(3) (2011-12).
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/11/2025 3:55 PM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
ACCEPTED 15-25-00016-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 2/13/2025 11:51 AM No. 15-25-00016-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CL
US ex rel. Mike Ahumada v. NISHpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DIAZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior Judge HAMILTON joined. DIAZ, Circuit Judge: Mike Ahumada, as relator, filed this qui tarn action on behalf of the United States under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. In his first amended complaint, Ahumada alleges that
ACCEPTED 13-15-00327-CV THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 8/31/2015 8:04:46 AM
Kenneth Pucillo v. National Credit Systems, Incopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21‐3131 KENNETH CODY PUCILLO, formerly known as KENNETH CODY LOCK, II, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United Sta
Kenneth Pucillo v. National Credit Systems, Incopublic domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21‐3131 KENNETH CODY PUCILLO, formerly known as KENNETH CODY LOCK, II, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. NATIONAL CREDIT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant‐Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United Sta
DREW, J. |]Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, Inc., Louisiana Health Service and *863Indemnity Company, Inc., HMO Louisiana, Inc., and RxBlue (collectively referred to as “Blue Cross”), appeal a judgment and supplemental judgment awarding damages and attorney fees for unfair trade practices in violation of the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protec
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Popapublic domain
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Popa, 2015 IL App (1st) 142053 Appellate Court BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, f/k/a Countrywide Home Caption Loans Servicing, LP, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL E. POPA, LIGIA CARMEN POPA 134-60 GLENCOE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, UNKNOWN OWNERS AND NONRECORD
Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Developmentpublic domain
BACHARACH, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join the majority’s .excellent opinion in Parts 11(A) and (C). But in connection with Part 11(B), I respectfully dissent. In my view, HUD enjoyed statutory authority to recoup overpayments under the block grants. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion in Part 11(B) that HUD lacked this auth
Modoc Lassen Indian Housing Authority v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Developmentpublic domain
BACHARACH, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join the majority’s excellent opinion in Parts 11(A) and (C). But in connection with Part 11(B), I respectfully dissent. In my view, HUD enjoyed statutory authority to recoup overpayments under the block grants. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conc
ACCEPTED 03-14-00518-CV 6061835 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 05-15-00161-CV 05-15-00161-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:21:23 PM NO.