Cases

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-2619 RANDALL ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADRIAN SANTOS, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern D

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of the possession with intent to sell and deliver cocaine and of the sale of cocaine in *Page 605 violation of G.S. 90-95(a)(1). Judgments were entered sentencing defendant to prison terms of five and ten years to be served consecutively. Defendant appeals. Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. First, he contends the trial court erred by refusing to allow him to a

*16 MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit on behalf of a putative class of African-American and Native-American secretaries and clerical employees currently or formerly employed by the Board of Governors of the Fed

Opinion issued May 9, 2023 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-21-00720-CV ——————————— ARTIS CHARLES HARRELL, Appellant V. JEROME GODINICH, JR., Appellee

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 27 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 18-10246 Plaintiff-Appellant,

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge | ⅛Appellants Artie Green’s Auto Repair and Body Shop, Inc., and Arthur Green, Jr., appeal after the Saline County Circuit Court denied their petition to declare Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-66-221 (Repl. 2005) unconstitutional. Appellants argue on appeal that the circuit court erred because' section 16-66-221 intrudes on the

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered August 16, 2006, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the d

WITHDRAWN 10/11/12 REISSUED 10/11/12 IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-11-00101-CR ARTIS LEE POLLARD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From th

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. DANIEL BREEN, Chief Judge. Introduction Before the Court is Defendant, Finishing Brands Holdings, Inc.’s (“FB”), motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 47.) Plaintiff, Louis Artis (“Artis”), filed a response to which FB replied. (D.E. 56, 84.) Plaint

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL (Memorandum Web Opinion) STATE V. GREEN NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY NEB. CT. R. APP. P. § 2-102(E). STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, V.

[Cite as State v. Green, 2020-Ohio-5206.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY : STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 28614 Plaintiff-Appellee :

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 3918372 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AU

ACCEPTED 03-14-00725-CV 4956355 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

*33ORDER Hennessy, United States Magistrate Judge Currently pending before the court is a motion brought by Camille Cosby (“Mrs. Cosby”), wife of defendant William H. Cosby, Jr. (“defendant”), seeking to quash Mrs. Cosby’s deposition subpoena, or in the alternative, for a protective order (Docket # 127). The motion relates to a subpoena dated December 9,

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Judges Chaney, Callins and White PUBLISHED Argued at Alexandria, Virginia JANE DOE OPINION BY v. Record No. 1450-22-4 JUDGE VERNIDA R. CHANEY AUGUST 6, 2024

884 A.2d 626 (2005) Freddie ARTIS-BEY, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee. No. 03-CV-220. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued December 1, 2004. Decided October 13, 2005. *628 Geoffrey D. Allen, Washington, DC, for appellant. Michael F. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General for the Distr

[Cite as Zirafi v. Green Mile Ents., L.L.C., 2025-Ohio-2862.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA CHRISTINE ZIRAFI, M.D., ET AL., : Plaintiffs-Appellants, : No. 114423 v. : GREEN MILE ENT

Carpinello, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Kane, J.), rendered January 6, 1994, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was convicted of two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree after trial and was sentenced to two concurrent 121/2 to 25

[Cite as Napoleon v. Green, 2014-Ohio-3192.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HENRY COUNTY CITY OF NAPOLEON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 7-13-17 v. MARK R. GREEN, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Napoleon Municipal Court Tri

Spain, J. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered June 17, 2008 in Albany County, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child (three counts). In October 2003, the three child victims moved into a house in the City of Albany shared by defendant, his girlfriend (who had become cust