Cases

807 A.2d 283 (2002) Edward GATLING, Jr. and Darlene Gatling, h/w, Appellants, v. EATON CORP., Uniroyal, Inc., Green Tweed & Co., A.W. Chesterson, Inc., AC & S Corp., Rite Hose Packing, Inc., Crane Packing, Rapid-America Corp., Cutler Hammer Companies, Clark Controller Companies, Shepard Niles, Appellees. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 23, 2002. Filed Augus

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered on or about July 9, 1998, granting the motion of defendants Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center and Bronx Lebanon Drug and Alcohol Out-Patient Program for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs. “[B]y engaging in a sport or recreational activity, a participant consents to those commonly appreciated risks which are inherent i

Golston-Green v City of New York (2020 NY Slip Op 02768) Golston-Green v City of New York 2020 NY Slip Op 02768 Decided on May 13, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Brathwaite Nelson, J.

PRICE, Judge: This appeal concerns an automobile accident occurring at the intersection of Longshore and Rutland Streets in Philadelphia. Rutland Street is one way northbound and is approximately twenty (20) feet wide. It intersects Long-shore Street at a right angle; Longshore being a thirty-six (36) foot wide street which accommodates east and westbound traffic. The intersection is controlled by a stop sign on Rutland Stre

RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONVENE A THREE JUDGE DISTRICT COURT BLUMENFELD, District Judge. Plaintiff Cynthia Gatling is an indigent juvenile who has been adjudicated a delinquent by the Juvenile Court for the Second District of Connecticut. She sought review of that adjudication by the Superior Court, see Conn.Gen.Stats. § 17-70(b), but was prevented from obtaining review

This action was brought by the plaintiffs in behalf of themselves and all other taxpayers of Raleigh Township and the City of Raleigh who will come in and make themselves plaintiffs, to declare null and void the valuation and assessment of real property in said township and *Page 244 city for taxation as shown by the lists of the assessors made in the year 1903 for the year 1903-04, and further to enjoin the Board of Commissioners of the County of Wake an

Judgment for defendant, appeal by plaintiffs. The defendant, on December 10th 1855, was appointed guardian to the infant children of Eppy Timberlake among whom were the plaintiffs, J. E. Timberlake and R. L. Timberlake, the intestate of the plaintiff, George S. Baker, and entered into bond with sureties for the discharge of his official duties. R. L. Timberlake attained his majority in November, 1868, and having died in 1872, administration on his estate was first committed to W. H. Spencer,

The plaintiffs as heirs at law of Joseph H. Riggan, sued to recover a tract of land, and defendants claim the same land under a deed of plaintiffs' ancestor to James T. Brown and a deed from Brown to them. The plaintiffs' reply to the defence set up that the deed of Joseph H. Riggan to James T. Brown was executed at a time when the grantor was of unsound mind and not of capacity to execute a deed, and to this the defendants rejoin, that they and Brown under whom they claim purchased of Riggan

Perkins J. This was a suit under the new code of practice, by Newell and Beach against Gatling, to obtain the rescission of an executed written contract. An answer was filed, to which there was a reply. Evidence was heard, and judgment of rescission rendered. The evidence was all properly placed upon the record, and an appeal taken to this Court. The case has been most elaborately

Mason v. Miles, 63 N.C. 564, cited and distinguished from this case. This suit was commenced in the late Court of Equity, and was regularly transferred to the Superior Court. It appears from the record, that an interlocutory decree for the sale of the land was made, but there has been no hearing upon further directions, and a final decree made confirming the sale and determining the rights of the parties. As the suit was in this condition whe

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 381 This action was brought by Robert Woodburn to obtain a judgment canceling and declaring void a deed of conveyance of certain mining property made by him to the defendants, upon the ground that it was executed by him by reason of fraudulent representations and undue influence *Page 382

Holcomb, J. The petitioner applied for and was denied a writ of habeas corpus by one of the judges of the district court of the fourth judicial district. By proceeding in error he brings his cáse here for review of the proceedings had and ruling made on his said application. After a preliminary hearing on a complaint for violating the provisions of section 531c of the Code of Civil Procedure, relative to exemptions of sixty da

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Frank James Rish, Sr., Respondent, v. Kathy Cotney Rish, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-000504 Appeal From Newberry County Joseph C. Smithdeal, Family Court Judge Opinion No. 5884 Submitted December 1, 2021 – Filed December 22, 2021

699 S.E.2d 439 (2010) BROWN v. HOST/TACO JOINT VENTURE. No. A10A0121. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 15, 2010. *441 Jack F. Witcher, Daniel B. Greenfield, Bremen, for appellant. Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Lindsay M. Gatling, Atlanta, for appellee. BERNES, Judge. David R. Brown filed suit

439 S.E.2d 169 (1994) 113 N.C. App. 282 Kenneth J. FOREMAN, Jr. and wife, Mary Frances O. Foreman, Trustees under Declaration Of Trust Dated August 6, 1981 v. S.H. SHOLL, M.D., Edward Henry Sholl, Eleanor B. Deex, George A. McElveen, Jr., B.G. North, B.G. Worth, Mrs. Bernard Germann, B.O. Townsend, Mrs. Ike C. Lowe, Mrs. Paul Mooney, W.T. Denman, III, Margaret G. Denman, Janie C. Williamson, El Dora Williamson, Oehlese Wil

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered May 10, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree and five counts *269of possession of burglar’s tools, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 3 to 6 years on the burglary conviction and 1 year each on the misdemeanor convictions, unanimously affirmed

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered September 20, 2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [4]), defendan

OPINION OF THE COURT Richter, J. In the early morning hours of April 21, 2006, Domingo Lopez was walking home from his job as a waiter. A car approached him at a slow speed but Lopez did not pay any attention at first because he thought they were looking for parking. Suddenly, Lopez heard people running behind him. As he turned around, Lopez saw defendants Malik Howard and Hilbert Stanley get out of the c

920 A.2d 887 (2007) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. Brandon WILLIAMS, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted January 9, 2007. Filed March 14, 2007. *888 Gerald Wassil, Wilkes-Barre, for appellant. David W. Lupas and Frank P. Barletta, Asst. Dist. Attys., Wilkes-Barre, for the Com., appellee.

ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: RESPONDENTS APPEARING PRO SE: MARILYN S. MEIGHEN RANDY BALLINGER ATTORNEY AT LAW SARA BALLINGER Carmel, IN Upland, IN BRIAN A. CUSIMANO FILED ATTORNEY AT LAW Sep 30 2020, 4:11 pm Indianapolis, IN