Cases

PER CURIAM: Reginald Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. O’Malley, No. l:06-cv-01039-RDB (D.Md. Mar. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

Paddock, J.: In an action to collect on a past-due note once barred by the statute of limitations, the district court ruled circumstances under which part payment was made revived only the principal obligation of the promissory note, but not the obligation to pay interest. Creditor Phillip H. O’Malley appeals, claiming it was error to only revive the principal term of the note. In addition, the debtors, Ronald L. and Kathryn A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) DEMETRIA C., 1 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-02975 (GMH) ) FRANK BISIGNANO, Acting ) Commissioner o

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TERESA D., 1 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:24-cv-02864 (GMH) FRANK BISIGNANO, 2 Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Teresa D. brought this action seek

742 A.2d 845 (1999) Patrick J. O'MALLEY and Leatha S. O'Malley, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. James R. BORIS, Stephen McConahey, Daniel D. Williams, Stanley Fallis, David Greene, Arthur McGivern, John Sullivan, Janet Reali, Thomas Reedy, Homer J. Livingston, Jr., William Daley, William Springer, William Esrey, C. Michael Viviano, Craig M. Black, Aldo Bonfiglio, Florence Z. Enders, R. G

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Ware v. O’Malley, Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-1855.] NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any

[Cite as O'Malley v. O'Malley, 2013-Ohio-5238.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98708 VICKI M. O’MALLEY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT vs.

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 177 Ohio St.3d 249.] THE STATE EX REL . WARE v. O’MALLEY, PROS. ATTY., ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Ware v. O’Malley, 2024-Ohio-5242.] Mandamus—Public Records Act—R.C. 149.43(B)(8)—Personnel file of assistant prosecuting attorney improperly withheld from inmate by prosecutor’s office under R.C. 149.43(B)(8) because personnel file did not concern a criminal investigation or prosecutio

DEHOOG, J. In this wage-claim case, defendant appeals the trial court’s award of attorney fees under ORS 652.200(2) and ORS 652.615. Plaintiff was a commercial truck driver who sued defendant, his former employer, for failing to pay wages that it owed plaintiff, and for withholding a small sum from his paycheck, albeit with his consent. The trial court transferred plaintiffs case to court-annexed arbitration, and the arbitrato

03/27/2018 DA 17-0035 Case Number: DA 17-0035 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2018 MT 65N STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MYKEL THOMAS O’MALLEY,

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS ********************* K.O., parent of * No. 13-472V A.F., a minor, * Special Master Christian J. Moran Petitioner, * * Filed: July 7, 2016 v. * Reissued: January 3, 2017 * SECRETARY OF HEALT

533 F.Supp.2d 548 (2007) Reginald L. LEE, Plaintiff pro se, v. Martin O'MALLEY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. RDB 06-1039. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 16, 2007. *549 Reginald Lee, Baltimore, MD, Pro se. William R. Phelan, Jr., Baltimore City Law Department, Patrick Sheridan, Baltimore Police Dep

GRIFFIN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLLIER, Chief D.J., joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 672-78), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge. Defendant Police Chief Gary Hagler appeals an order of the district court denying his motion for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity regarding plaintiff Sean O’Mall

901 A.2d 279 (2006) 169 Md. App. 408 Kevin P. CLARK v. Martin O'MALLEY et al. No. 276, September Term, 2005. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. June 30, 2006. *281 Neal M. Janey (Stuart O. Simms, A. Dwight Petit, on the brief), Baltimore, MD, for appellant. Ralph S. Tyler, City Solicitor (Joshua

Per Curiam. *1355 Appellee Green Shades Software, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by Appellant Aatrix Software, Inc. The petition and response were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal, and thereafte

28 A.3d 936 (2011) Susan (Nawn) GREEN, Petitioner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (U.S. Airways), Respondent. No. 2539 C.D. 2010. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted on Briefs May 13, 2011. Decided August 22, 2011. Reargument Denied October 10, 2011. *937 Kevin R. O'Malley, Pittsb

OPINION GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge: This is a removed diversity case, tried under Pennsylvania law. Plaintiff, an experienced skier, was injured in a fall on a Pennsylvania ski slope. She sued the owner of the ski area alleging various acts of negligence with respect to design, inspection, equipment and maintenance of the ski

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff attempted to exercise an option to renew his lease with defendant after it had expired. After his attempt was rejected by defendant, plaintiff commenced this action seeking judgment declaring that he duly exercised the option to renew the lease and an injunction prohibiting defendant from commencing a proceeding t

211 Wis.2d 622 (1997) 566 N.W.2d 494 Gianni BOZZACCHI and Kelley Bozzacchi, Husband and Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Thomas S. O'MALLEY and Ruth O'Malley, Husband and Wife, Defendants-Respondents. No. 97-0086-FT. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs April 1, 1997. Decided May 6, 1997.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Matthew Gilmore, et al., appeal from a decision of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, which partially granted defendants-appellees, Village Green Management Co., Village Green of Beachwood LP, and Village Green Residential Properties LTD's (collectively referred to as "the Village"), motion to exclude plaintiffs' expert witness's opinion that negligent construction in the Village Green apartments caused an electrical fault in the floo