Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Jeffrey T. Gilbert, United States Magistrate Judge Plaintiff Karen Hoosier (“Hoosier”) filed this lawsuit against her employer defendant Greenwood Hospitality Management LLC (“Greenwood”) alleging that her supervisor discriminated against her based on her race and her age, subjected her to a hostile work environment and retaliated against her for complaining about the harassm

BRADFORD, Judge. Case Summary [1] After Marion Peeples and his wife Eve passed away, the trust provided for in their wills was established (“The Trust”). The Trust provided for the award of scholarships to Indiana high school graduates, preferably from Franklin High School, who wished to pursue post-secondary education in certain fields. Union Bank & Trust was initially the trustee of the Trust, and,

Thomas B. Russel, Senior Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, Deere & Company ("Deere"), brings this action alleging that Defendant, *848FIMCO, Inc. ("FIMCO"), is acting in violation of federal trademark and common law by producing and distributing trailed agricultural sprayers and applicators bearing green and

Jun 19 2015, 9:31 am ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE INDIANA Daniel J. Paul ATTORNEY GENERAL Williams Barrett & Wilkowski, LLP Gregory F. Zoeller Greenwood, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Frances Barrow

266 F.Supp.2d 909 (2003) Rita Lynn BAKER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN MORRELL & CO., Defendant. No. C01-4003-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. June 11, 2003. *915 Jay Elliot Denne, Munger, Stanley E. Munger, Reinschmidt & Denne, Sioux City, IA, for Plaintiff. Gary P. Thimsen, Melanie L. Carpent

ROSSMAN, J. This is a controversy concerning the validity of the alleged will of Thomas Henry Edwards, executed February 21, 1929, in Portland, Ore*596gon. Edwards died September 16, 1929, in San Diego, California, aged 59 years. The will was presented for probate in common form to the circuit court (probate department) of Multnomah county, and was so admitted September 2

ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL

This is an action for a declaratory judgment. We gather from the petition the following facts: Plaintiff, General Insurance Company of America, is a stock company duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Washington relating to fire insurance companies; that the defendant Arthur J. Ham is the Insurance Commissioner of this state; that plaintiff has been and now is duly authorized to write policies of fire insurance in this state, and has a license to do so; that the articles

Mr. Presiding Justice Matchett delivered the opinion of the court. The subject matter of this litigation is 729 shares of the capital stock of the John M. Smyth Company, a corporation, and certain dividends declared thereon. Harriett Flynn Boyle, appellant, claims this property as sole legatee under the will of her sister, Mary Flynn Smyth. The childre

The certified question calls for a determination of the order of priority as between a duly registered chattel mortgage lien upon a printing press and an engine, constituting portions of a printing office outfit, given to secure purchase money, and a subsequently arising duly fixed and duly sued upon statutory artisan's lien upon said printing press and said engine. The decision of the trial court, that the statutory lien upon the press and engine was superior to the contract lien ther

HAWKINS, J. (dissenting). The certified question calls for a determination -of the order of priority as between a duly registered chattel mortgage lien upon a printing press and an engine, constituting portions of a printing office outfit, given to secure purchase money, and a subsequently arising duly fixed and duly sued upon statutory artisan’s lien upon said printing press and said engine. The decision of

Hart, J., (after stating the facts). In this State no distinction is made between the meaning of the words “bodily heirs” and “heirs of the body,” when used in a conveyance, and it is a principle firmly established in this State that, under section 735 of Kirby’s Digest, a deed of conveyance to the grantee and his bodily heirs creates a life estate in the grantee with the remainder in fee simple in his childre

LEDDY, J. The Tyler Vulcanizing & Battery Company, a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the battery company, was engaged in business in the city of Tyler. It had executed two chattel mortgages, covering various items of personal property, to secure certain notes executed to the People’s State Bank of Tyler, hereinafter referred to as the bank. The battery company was unable to pay this and other indebtedness, and, after

NOYES, Circuit Judge (concurring). The modern tendency of business is toward co-operation, instead of competition. This tendency, while of earlier inception, has developed with phenomenal activity in this country during the past 20 years — especially during the past decade. Concentration of interests and unification of control have taken the place of separate and independent operation. Important industrial corporations, forme

*Ladd, J. The first objection is, that the necessary parties were not before the court in the outset; that John A. Cole and John Davis, 2d, being parties to the indenture, ought to have been made parties to the bill. We think this objection cannot prevail. The case shows that Davis, for a valuable consideration, transferred and assigned to the plaintiff all his right, title, and int

McKENNA, Circuit Judge. This suit is brought against the board of railroad commissioners, to enjoin them from enforcing a certain resolution reducing the rates on grain and other freight on the lines of railroad operated by complainant. The bill is too long to quote in full; hence I shall give only such summary of its important allegations as will assist the understanding of this opinion. It alleges the jurisdi

Sawveh, J., concurring. The discussion in this opinion, though applicable to all the cases tried, will have special reference to the facts in the case of Santa Clara county, No. 3,074. This case is similar, in the main features, to that of San Mateo Co. v. Southern Pac. R. Co., decided by this court last year. 8 Sawy. 281; [S. C. 18 Fed. Rep. 147, 722.]

The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203 2023 CO 63 Supreme Court Case No. 23SA300 Appeal Pursuant to § 1-1-113(3), C.R.S. (2023) District Court, City and County of Denver, Case No. 23CV32577 Honorable Sarah B. Wallace, Judge Petitioners-Appellants/Cross-Appellees: Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, Cla

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER David L. Bunning, United States District Judge This case presents the question of whether a defendant’s unsupported denial of the facts in a search warrant affidavit can trigger a Franks hearing. For the reasons stated below, the answer to that question is no. I. Factual and Procedural Background On August 25, 2016, Northern Kentu

2025 WI 34 STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JOAN L. STETZER, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2023AP874-CR Decided July 3, 2025 REVIEW of a decision of the Court of Appeals Waukesha County Circuit Court (Paul Bugenhagen Jr., J.)