⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gregory Brent Byers”

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
DATE: 08/05/2014 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 14:36:36 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE REPORT: ctrk_crt SORT BY : COUNTY CODE, LAWYER LAST NAME CRITERIA: COMPLIANCE YEAR END DATE = 12312013 GROUP 3, REINST FEE ASSESSED ______________________________________________________
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 25 N.E.3d 807; 2015 Ind. App. LEXIS 79; 2015 WL 520799
KIRSCH, Judge. Shane L. Keller was convicted following a jury trial of two counts of Class B felony burglary, 1 one count of Class C felony burglary, 2 three counts of Class D felony theft, 3 and two counts of
Indiana Supreme Court · 2018-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 99 N.E.3d 240
All Justices concur. Attachment Adams County 30678-01 CLE Jill Nicole Holtzclaw *2416061 W US Hwy 224 Decatur, Indiana 46733 Allen County 2658-02 CLE <
Oregon Tax Court · 1995-10-17 · Published · cited 3× · 13 Or. Tax 372; 1995 Ore. Tax LEXIS 38
Delta Air Lines, Inc., (Delta) appeals the assessed value of its property for the 1992-93 tax year. The primary issue concerns the correct method of calculating the value of leased property. Delta is a major national and international airline that carries passengers and freight. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, it serves 163 U.S. cities and 56 cities in 33 foreign countries. Delta has six domestic hub airports (Atlanta, Dallas/Fort Worth, Cincinnati, Salt Lake City, Los Angeles and O
Misskelley v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996-04-01 · Published · cited 80× · 915 S.W.2d 702; 323 Ark. 449; 1996 Ark. LEXIS 208
915 S.W.2d 702 (1996) 323 Ark. 449 Jessie Lloyd MISSKELLEY, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee. No. CR 94-848. Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 19, 1996. Opinion on Denial of Rehearing April 1, 1996. *706 Daniel T. Stidham, Gregory L. Crow, Paragould, for Appellant. J
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-11-22 · Published · cited 73× · 81 A.3d 851; 623 Pa. 60
Justice SAYLOR, dissenting. I respectfully dissent, as I would find that the diseases in question were meant to be covered by the terms of the Workers’ Compensation Act, but that compensation is unavailable due to the expiration of the 300-week statutory period. Thus, I would find that the constitutional claims raised by Plaintiffs have become salient and that the Attorney General should be given an opportunit
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2021-03-26 · Published · cited 0×
03/26/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 4, 2020 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JADARIUS SANKEVIOUS FOSTER Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 19-788 Roy B. Morgan, Jr., Judge ___________________________________
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2023-01-31 · Published · cited 5× · 225 N.E.3d 728; 2023 IL App (5th) 230035
2023 IL App (5th) 230035 NOTICE Decision filed 01/31/23. The text of this decision may be NO. 5-23-0035 changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Peti ion for Rehearing or the disposition of IN THE the same. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT _______________________________________________________________
United States Court of Claims · 1991-04-05 · Published · cited 0× · 22 Cl. Ct. 716; 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 476; 1991 U.S. Claims LEXIS 110; 1991 WL 47003
OPINION BRUGGINK, Judge. This action involves overtime pay claims brought pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1988). Plaintiffs are past or present GS-1811 special agents with the Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”). On January 18, 1991, this court considered its jurisdiction to entertain the plaintiffs' claims in light of the holding in Carter v. Gibbs, </
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995-01-11 · Published · cited 18× · 892 P.2d 604; 119 N.M. 471
892 P.2d 604 (1995) 119 N.M. 471 Isidro SENA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NEW MEXICO STATE POLICE, Defendant-Appellant, Dale M. Scott, and Viking Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Defendants. No. 14444. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 11, 1995. *605 Martin J. Chavez and Lorenzo A. Chavez, Chavez Law Offic
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-05-28 · Published · cited 329× · 527 F.3d 299; 13 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1089; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11311; 2008 WL 2190843
527 F.3d 299 (2008) Richard LAWRENCE; Kevin Jackson; John Cole; Scott D. McGarrigle; Richard Marks; Ivan T. Damjanovic; Morgan Miller; Alan Sigal; W. Russel Bryant; Mervin K. Ghani; Alleyne Arturo; Joni H. Kuonen; Domenic Rosati; John W. Getty; Joseph C. Mancini; William Brent; Michael Brooks; Duane J. Boyes; Michael A. Flak; J. Todd Vreeland; Adam Wojnicki; Timothy S. O'Toole; Carl F. Pfefferle; Beth Ann Glynn; William Murphy; Matthew Konieczka; Cory Bu
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008-05-28 · Published · cited 0×
Opinions of the United 2008 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-28-2008 Lawrence v. Philadelphia Precedential or Non-P
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2009-04-01 · Published · cited 3× · 608 F. Supp. 2d 724; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28806; 2009 WL 886226
608 F.Supp.2d 724 (2009) Robert & Donna JOWERS, Plaintiffs, v. BOC GROUP, INC., Esab Group, Inc., and Lincoln Electric Co., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-CV-0036. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division. April 1, 2009. *728 Scott O. Nelson, Maples & Lomax, PA, Pascagoula, MS, Christopher T. Robertson
John B. v. Goetzpublic domain
District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010-01-28 · Published · cited 4× · 879 F. Supp. 2d 787; 2010 WL 8754110; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8821
MEMORANDUM WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I.History of this Litigation....................................................796 A. Consent Decree and Earlier Proceedings..................................797 B. The Court’s 2001 Findings of the Defendants’ Noncompliance................801 C. T