⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Gregory C Treece”

Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014-05-29 · Published · cited 39× · 10 N.E.3d 52; 2014 WL 2396051; 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 238
OPINION CRONE, Judge. Case Summary Floyd William Treece was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and possession of an illegal drug lab and admitted to being a habitual offender. He was' sentenced to an aggregate term of fourteen years, which included a term of commitment to the Department of Correction (“DOC”), followed by time in
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994-03-25 · Published · cited 14× · 19 F.3d 1255; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 5443; 25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 729
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge. The Keenihans appeal the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s denial of their motion to dismiss. We reverse and remand with instructions to dismiss the debt- or’s bankruptcy petition. *1257 1. BACKGROUND
District Court, S.D. New York · 2005-01-13 · Published · cited 16× · 383 F. Supp. 2d 488; 55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 776; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 419; 2005 WL 82133
383 F.Supp.2d 488 (2005) AVENTIS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE USA LP, f/k/a Agrevo Environmental Health, Inc., Plaintiff, v. SCOTTS COMPANY, Scotts' Miracle-Gro Products, Inc., OMS Investments, Inc., and Monsanto Company Defendants. No. 99 Civ. 4015(LAP)(THK). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 13, 2005. *489
Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009-05-28 · Published · cited 361× · 224 P.3d 301; 2009 WL 1152148
224 P.3d 301 (2009) Andrew BLOOD and Carrie Blood, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. QWEST SERVICES CORPORATION and Qwest Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, and Public Service Company of Colorado, d/b/a Xcel Energy, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee. No. 08CA0134. Colorado Court of Appeals, Div. IV. April 30, 2009. As Modified on Denial of Rehearings May 28, 2009.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009-03-20 · Published · cited 8× · 605 F. Supp. 2d 870; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24167; 2009 WL 804156
605 F.Supp.2d 870 (2009) CHURCHILL DOWNS INC., et al., Plaintiffs v. THOROUGHBRED HORSEMEN'S GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:08-CV-225-H. United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Louisville. March 20, 2009. *873 K. Gregory Haynes, Wyatt Tarrant & Combs, Louisville, KY, Kevin C. Pecoraro, David M. Sch
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-02-02 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Feb 02 2016, 8:53 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE R. Patrick Magrath Gregory F. Zoeller Alcorn Sage Schwartz & Magrath, L
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987-08-17 · Published · cited 22× · 826 F.2d 1266
826 F.2d 1266 George Rahsaan BROOKSv.Lt. ANDOLINA, Wilson Spencer, Paul Burgard, Capt. Tohey,Lawrence Weyandt, James Wigton, Russell Treece,George Petsock, Glen Jeffres, andRichard Thornburgh.Appeal of Lt. ANDOLINA, Wilson Spencer, Paul Burgard, Capt.Tohey, Lawrence Weyandt, James Wigton, RussellTreece, George Petsock and Glen Jeffres.George Rahsaan BROOKS, Appellant,v.Lt. ANDOLINA, Wilson Spencer, Paul B
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Aug 13 2015, 8:12 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Christopher L. Clerc Gregory F. Zoel
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018-09-06 · Published · cited 49× · 902 F.3d 735
Wood, Chief Judge. *737 This putative class action rests on allegations of a massive antitrust conspiracy within the domestic steel industry. Plaintiffs, indirect purchasers of steel, assert that eight U.S. steel producers colluded to slash output in an effort to drive up the price of stee
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-11-28 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 28 2016, 8:46 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-11-15 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 15 2016, 7:04 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2011-05-23 · Published · cited 694× · 252 P.3d 1071; 2011 Colo. LEXIS 428; 2011 WL 2138162
Justice EID, dissenting. In closing argument, Blood's counsel repeatedly argued that punitive damages were justified in this case because Qwest had failed to adopt a periodic pole inspection program subsequent to Blood's infury-a line of argument that was improper under the district court's pretrial ruling excluding evidence of Qwest's post-injury conduct. In order to gauge the impact of that closing argume
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-02-29 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Feb 29 2016, 9:28 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE David W. Stone, IV Gregory F. Zoeller Anderson, Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-06-15 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Jun 15 2016, 6:31 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), CLERK Indiana Supreme Court this Memorandum Decision shall not be Court of Appeals and Tax Court regarded as precedent or cited b
Marquez v. Jacksonpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-01-29 · Published · cited 13× · 2018 Ohio 346; 105 N.E.3d 517
SCHAFER, Presiding Judge. {¶ 1} Defendant-Appellant James M. Jackson appeals from the judgment entered by the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, which granted Plaintiff-Appellee Lucia T. Marquez's motion for a new trial. We affirm. I. {¶ 2} This matter arises from an automobile accident on April 5, 1997. On January 29, 1999, Ms. Marquez file
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-02-16 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be Feb 16 2016, 9:03 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Steven E. Ripstra Gregory F. Zoeller Ripstra Law Office
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009-06-08 · Published · cited 0× · 634 F. Supp. 2d 881; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47783; 2009 WL 1606020
634 F.Supp.2d 881 (2009) Gerald M. McLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff, v. Richard CASLER, et al., Defendants. No. 07 C 6906. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. June 8, 2009. *885 Arthur R. Ehrlich, Jonathan C. Goldman, Goldman & Ehrlich, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Iain D. Johnston, Andrew Robert Greene,
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994-10-24 · Published · cited 6× · 867 F. Supp. 1338; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15189; 1994 WL 635031
867 F.Supp. 1338 (1994) In re BRAND NAME PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ANTITRUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. No. 94 C 897. No. MDL 997. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 24, 1994. Catherine A. Sazdanoff, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, Frank Cicero, Jr., James Andrew Langan, Jeffrey A. Leon, Anne J. McClain, Jeffrey S.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008-07-31 · Published · cited 15× · 535 F.3d 1166; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16233; 2008 WL 2926226
535 F.3d 1166 (2008) Marla SEWELL; Brooke Sewell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance corporation; Hays Companies, a Colorado corporation; Professional Lines Insurance Brokerage, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 07-1255. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 31, 2008.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-10-31 · Published · cited 42× · 62 N.E.3d 1224; 2016 Ind. App. LEXIS 396; 2016 WL 6434343
BROWN, Judge. [1] Justin S. Johnson appeals the trial court’s order revoking his community corrections placement and ordering him to serve the remainder of his executed sentence in prison. Johnson raises one issue which we revise and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his placement in community corrections. We reverse and remand.