Cases

*********** In accord with the decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, the Full Commission is entering the following Opinion and Award to comply with the remand instructions of the Supreme Court. The findings of fact and conclusions of law from the January 18, 2005 and May 11, 2007 Opinions and Awards of the Full Commission remain unchanged, except that finding of fact number 31 and conclusions of law numbers nine and 10 are added to th

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-18-00019-CV ___________________________ IN RE: THE COMMITMENT OF GREGORY A. JONES On Appeal from the 89th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. 185,786-C Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Pittman, JJ. Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 8, 2007 Session IN THE MATTER OF B.C.W. JOHN GREGORY WILSON v. NAOMI JONES, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Davidson County No. 9619-30975 (97-06818) Betty Adams Green, Juvenile Judge No. M2007-00168-COA-R3-JV - Filed February 19, 2008 This is an appeal

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED ST. MARKS POND INDUSTRIAL, LLC F/K/A ST. MARKS POND BORROW PIT, LLC, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D22-1201

713 S.E.2d 68 (2011) Andrea GREGORY, Employee/Plaintiff, v. W.A. BROWN & SONS, Employer, PMA Insurance Group, Carrier/Defendants. No. COA10-1521. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. June 7, 2011. *69 DeVore Acton & Stafford, P.A., Charlotte, by William D. Acton, Jr., for plaintiff appellee. Hedrick, Gardner, Ki

Justice HUDSON dissenting. We squarely decided the question presented here in our recent, unanimous decision in Richardson v. Maxim Healthcare/Allegis Group, 362 N.C. 657, 669 S.E.2d 582 (2008). Despite no change to the governing statutory framework, the majority would essentially overrule Richardson just one year later, while claiming not to do so, in order to reach a particular outcome here.

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2023-3762 Lower Tribunal No. 2022-DR-013795-O _____________________________ VERNECE HUTCHINS, Appellant, v. ESTATE OF DERRICK W. HUTCHINS, KATRINA SPINGER HUTCHINS, N

OPINION WILLIAM J. BOYCE, Justice. In cause number 14-12-00963-CV, Michael E. Fitzmaurice appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion to dismiss Harvella Jones’s suit against him. In cause number 14-12-01121-CV, William Fitzmaurice, Dorothy Fitzmaurice, Gregory Brumbaugh, and Karen McClure appeal from the trial court’s order denying th

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge. IjThe issues in this appeal concern the amount of alimony the Washington County Circuit Court ordered appellant Bert R. Jones, Jr., to pay his ex-wife, appellee Sonja Jones. We affirm the circuit court’s decision. Bert and Sonja were divorced by decree entered on July 2, 2013.

KURT S. ODENWALD, Judge Introduction Gregory Bryant Jones ("Jones") appeals from the judgment of the trial court, entered after a jury convicted him on two counts of first-degree statutory sodomy. On appeal, Jones raises three points. First, Jones contends that the trial court erred in admitting Jones's prior convictions as propensity evidence without first balancing whether the probative value of such evide

SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge. Nevida Cypress appeals the district court’s 1 order upholding the denial of supplemental security income (SSI) and disability insurance benefits (DIB). Upon de novo review of the district court’s decision upholding the Administrative Law Judge’s

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-3240 ___________________________ Tracy Milam lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

ORDER PER CURIAM Chad W. Jones appeals from judgment upon his conviction after, a jury trial on one count of robbery in the second degree, in violation of Section 569.030, RSMo 2000. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reci

BEAM, Circuit Judge. Carrie Andrews appeals from the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner”) denial of Andrews’ application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Secur

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Timothy Brown appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. Brown filed his application for benefits in December 2011, alleging disability beginning in November 2011 due to severe hearing loss, diabetes, diabetic neuropathy, chronic obstruc

Blackwell, Justice. Hiram Jones was tried by a Dougherty County jury and convicted of felony murder and armed robbery in connection with the stabbing death of J.M. “Jake” King.1 On appeal, Jones contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his trial lawyer opened a door for the prosecution to elicit otherwise inadmissible evidence of his bad character. Jones also argues

PER CURIAM. Delano Alfonca Jones appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to return property seized by the police at the time of his arrest. The State concedes error except as to the single firearm discharged by Jones resulting in the charges against him. We accept the State's concession and reverse the order denying return of the property seized by the police except as to the shotgun that formed the basis of count III of

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

James Edward Welsh, Presiding Judge Jeffrey L. Jones appeals the circuit court’s judgment modifying his child support obligations for his son. Jones asserts two points on appeal. First, he contends that the circuit court erred in ordering a retroactive increase in his child support for the time periods of January 1, 2015, to August 30, 2015, and September 1, 2015, to beyond October 18, 2015, because the circuit court did not

ORDER Per Curiam: Richard E. Jones appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after he pleaded guilty to one count of the Class D felony of destruction of jail property. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).